- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT02499770
Trilaciclib (G1T28), a CDK 4/6 Inhibitor, in Combination With Etoposide and Carboplatin in Extensive Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer (SCLC)
Phase 1b/2a Safety and Pharmacokinetic Study of G1T28 in Patients With Extensive Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer (SCLC) Receiving Etoposide and Carboplatin
This is a study to investigate the potential clinical benefit of trilaciclib (G1T28) in preserving the bone marrow and the immune system, and enhancing chemotherapy antitumor efficacy when administered prior to carboplatin and etoposide in first line treatment for patients with newly diagnosed extensive-stage SCLC.
The study consists of 2 parts: a limited open-label, dose-finding portion (Part 1), and a randomized double-blind portion (Part 2). Both parts include 3 study phases: Screening Phase, Treatment Phase, and Survival Follow-up Phase. The Treatment Phase begins on the day of first dose with study treatment and completes at the Post-Treatment Visit. Approximately, 90 patients will be enrolled in the study; 20 patients in the Part 1 and 70 patients in the Part 2 portion.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Phase 2
- Phase 1
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Rennes, France, 35033
- CHU de Rennes Hopital Pontchaillou
-
-
-
-
-
Tbilisi, Georgia, 0112
- Arensia Exploratory Medicine Llc
-
-
-
-
-
Budapest, Hungary, 1121
- Orszagos Koranyi Tbc es Pulmonologiai Intezet, XI. Tudobelosztaly
-
Szolnok, Hungary, 5000
- Hetényi Géza Kórház
-
-
Veszprem
-
Farkasgyepu, Veszprem, Hungary, 8582
- Veszprem Megyei Tudogyogyintezet
-
-
-
-
-
Chisinau, Moldova, Republic of, 2025
- ARENSIA Exploratory Medicine Phase I Unit, The Institute of Oncology
-
-
-
-
-
Olsztyn, Poland, 10-357
- Samodzielny Publiczny ZespAA GruAicy i ChorAb PA¿uc
-
Torun, Poland, 87-100
- Wojewódzki Szpital Zespolony im. L. Rydygiera
-
Warszawa, Poland, 02-781
- Centrum Onkologii-Instytut im. Marii Sklodowskiej-Curie
-
-
-
-
-
Barcelona, Spain, 08041
- Hospital de La Santa Creu I Sant Pau
-
Castillón, Spain, 12002
- Consorcio Hospitalario Provincial
-
Madrid, Spain, 28040
- Fundacion Jimenez Diaz
-
Madrid, Spain, 28009
- Hgu Gregorio Maranon
-
-
Andalucia
-
Malaga, Andalucia, Spain, 29010
- Hospital Regional Universitario HRU Carlos Haya Malaga
-
-
-
-
Arkansas
-
Hot Springs, Arkansas, United States, 71913
- Genesis Cancer Center
-
Rogers, Arkansas, United States, 72758
- Highlands Oncology Group
-
-
California
-
Whittier, California, United States, 90603
- The Oncology Institute of Hope and Innovation
-
-
Colorado
-
Colorado Springs, Colorado, United States, 80909
- Memorial Hospital - Univ. of Colorado Health
-
Fort Collins, Colorado, United States, 80528
- University of Colorado Health, Oncology Clinical Research Northern Region
-
-
Florida
-
Boca Raton, Florida, United States, 33486
- Boca Raton Regional Hospital - Lynn Cancer Institute
-
Fort Myers, Florida, United States, 33916
- Florida Cancer Specialists - South
-
Tavares, Florida, United States, 32778
- Florida Cancer Specialists - North
-
West Palm Beach, Florida, United States, 33401
- Florida Cancer Specialists - East
-
-
Georgia
-
Athens, Georgia, United States, 30607
- University Cancer and Blood Center, LLC
-
Atlanta, Georgia, United States, 30322
- Emory University
-
-
Kentucky
-
Louisville, Kentucky, United States, 40202
- Norton Cancer Institute
-
-
Maryland
-
Bethesda, Maryland, United States, 20817
- Center for Cancer and Blood Disorders
-
-
New Hampshire
-
Lebanon, New Hampshire, United States, 03756
- Norris Cotton Cancer Center
-
-
New Mexico
-
Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States, 87106
- University of New Mexico Comprehensive Cancer Center
-
-
New York
-
Buffalo, New York, United States, 14263
- Roswell Park
-
-
North Carolina
-
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States, 27514
- UNC - Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center
-
-
Oklahoma
-
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States, 73117
- Oklahoma University - Peggy and Charles Stephenson Cancer Center
-
-
Pennsylvania
-
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19107
- Thomas Jefferson University
-
Sayre, Pennsylvania, United States, 18840
- Guthrie Medical Group, PC
-
-
South Carolina
-
Greenville, South Carolina, United States, 29605
- Greenville Health System
-
Spartanburg, South Carolina, United States, 29203
- Gibbs Cancer Center
-
-
Tennessee
-
Knoxville, Tennessee, United States, 37909
- Tennessee Cancer Specialists
-
Knoxville, Tennessee, United States, 37920
- Hanna Cancer Associates - University of Tennessee
-
-
Texas
-
Tyler, Texas, United States, 75702
- Texas Oncology
-
-
Washington
-
Vancouver, Washington, United States, 98684
- Northwest Cancer Specialists, P.C.
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Male or female subjects aged ≥18 years
- Unequivocally confirmed diagnosis of SCLC by histology or cytology, preferably including the presence of neuroendocrine features by immunohistochemistry
- At least 1 target lesion that is unirradiated and measurable by RECIST, Version 1.1
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 - 2
- Adequate organ function
Exclusion Criteria:
- Prior chemotherapy for extensive-stage SCLC
- Presence of symptomatic brain metastases requiring immediate treatment with radiation therapy or steroids.
- Uncontrolled ischemic heart disease or uncontrolled symptomatic congestive heart failure
- Known history of stroke or cerebrovascular accident within 6 months prior to enrollment
- Other uncontrolled serious chronic disease or conditions that in the investigator's opinion could affect compliance or follow-up in the protocol
- Concurrent radiotherapy to any site or radiotherapy within 2 weeks prior to enrollment or previous radiotherapy to the target lesion sites (the sites that are to be followed for determination of a response)
- Receipt of any investigational medication within 4 weeks prior to enrollment
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
- Allocation: RANDOMIZED
- Interventional Model: PARALLEL
- Masking: DOUBLE
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
EXPERIMENTAL: trilaciclib + carboplatin/etoposide
All patients in part 1 will receive trilaciclib (G1T28) prior to standard chemotherapy- carboplatin and etoposide.
Patients will have PK assessments completed on days 1 and 3 in cycle 1 only.
All patents will be monitored for safety and tumor response based on RECIST version 1.1.
Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and concomitant medications commences at the time that informed consent is obtained and continues through the Post Treatment Visit.
|
Other Names:
Other Names:
Other Names:
|
EXPERIMENTAL: trilaciclib/placebo + carboplatin/etoposide
All patients enrolled in part 2 will be randomized to receive either trilaciclib (G1T28) or placebo administered prior to standard chemotherapy- carboplatin and etoposide.
All patents will be monitored for safety and tumor response based on RECIST version 1.1.
Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and concomitant medications commences at the time that informed consent is obtained and continues through the Post Treatment Visit.
|
Other Names:
Other Names:
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Number of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicities by Cohort in Cycle 1, Part 1
Time Frame: Days 1-21 of Cycle 1
|
Dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were drug-related toxicities defined as follows:
Toxicities not clearly related to etoposide/carboplatin therapy were also considered for the purposes of determining DLTs. |
Days 1-21 of Cycle 1
|
Incidence of Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Related AEs, Related SAEs, and AEs Leading to Study Drug Discontinuation in Part 1
Time Frame: TEAEs were any AE that started on or after the first dose of study drug and up to the last dose +30 days (a minimum of 51 days up to a maximum of 374 days)
|
An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a medicinal product that did not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment.
TEAEs were defined as any AE that started on or after the first dose of study drug and up to the last dose +30 days.
SAEs were defined as any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose resulted in death, was life threatening, required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity or was a congenital anomaly/birth defect.
Relatedness to study drug was assessed by the investigator.
Related refers to those events that were Possibly, Probably, or Definitely Related.
AEs with an unknown/not reported onset date were also included.
|
TEAEs were any AE that started on or after the first dose of study drug and up to the last dose +30 days (a minimum of 51 days up to a maximum of 374 days)
|
Duration of Severe (Grade 4) Neutropenia in Part 2
Time Frame: From randomization to the end of the treatment period (a minimum of 51 days up to a maximum of 379 days)
|
Severe (Grade 4) neutropenia was defined as at least 1 ANC value <0.5 × 10^9/L during the treatment period.
Within each cycle, the duration (days) of severe neutropenia was defined as the number of days from the date of the first ANC value of <0.5 × 10^9/L observed between start of cycle and end of cycle to the date of the first ANC value ≥0.5 × 10^9/L that met the following criteria: 1) occurred after the ANC value of <0.5 × 10^9/L and 2) no other ANC values <0.5 × 10^9/L occurred between this day and end of cycle.
The duration of severe neutropenia only included participants who had at least 1 severe neutropenia event in the cycle, and censoring rules were applied for unresolved severe neutropenia in a cycle.
For the treatment period, the overall duration of severe neutropenia was the median value among the durations from all cycles.
|
From randomization to the end of the treatment period (a minimum of 51 days up to a maximum of 379 days)
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Trilaciclib in Cycle 1, Part 1
Time Frame: Days 1 and 3 of Cycle 1 for a 21-day cycle
|
Cmax of trilaciclib in plasma was determined from individual concentration-time data by non-compartmental analysis methods.
The actual sampling times in relation to dosing were used.
For estimation of Cmax, a concentration that was below the limit of quantification (BLQ) was assigned a value of zero if it occurred in a profile before the first measurable concentration.
If a BLQ value occurred after a measurable concentration in a profile, and was followed by a value above the lower limit of quantification, then the BLQ was treated as missing data.
If a BLQ value occurred at the end of the collection interval (after the last quantifiable concentration) it was treated as missing data.
If two BLQ values occurred in succession after Cmax, the profile was deemed to have terminated at the first BLQ value and any subsequent concentrations were omitted.
|
Days 1 and 3 of Cycle 1 for a 21-day cycle
|
Area Under the Plasma Concentration Versus Time Curve From Time Zero Extrapolated to Infinity (AUC0-inf) for Trilaciclib in Cycle 1, Part 1
Time Frame: Days 1 and 3 of Cycle 1 for a 21-day cycle
|
AUC0-inf of trilaciclib in plasma was determined from individual concentration-time data by non-compartmental analysis methods.
The actual sampling times in relation to dosing were used.
|
Days 1 and 3 of Cycle 1 for a 21-day cycle
|
Time of Maximum Observed Concentration (Tmax) of Trilaciclib in Cycle 1, Part 1
Time Frame: Days 1 and 3 of Cycle 1 for a 21-day cycle
|
Tmax of trilaciclib in plasma was determined from individual concentration-time data by non-compartmental analysis methods.
The actual sampling times in relation to dosing were used.
|
Days 1 and 3 of Cycle 1 for a 21-day cycle
|
Cmax of Etoposide and Free and Total Carboplatin in Cycle 1, Part 1
Time Frame: Days 1 and 3 of Cycle 1 for a 21-day cycle (carboplatin was only dosed on Day 1 so there are no Day 3 Cmax values)
|
Cmax of etoposide and free and total carboplatin in plasma were determined from individual concentration-time data by non-compartmental analysis methods.
The actual sampling times in relation to dosing were used.
For estimation of Cmax, a concentration that was BLQ was assigned a value of zero if it occurred in a profile before the first measurable concentration.
If a BLQ value occurred after a measurable concentration in a profile, and was followed by a value above the lower limit of quantification, then the BLQ was treated as missing data.
If a BLQ value occurred at the end of the collection interval (after the last quantifiable concentration) it was treated as missing data.
If two BLQ values occurred in succession after Cmax, the profile was deemed to have terminated at the first BLQ value and any subsequent concentrations were omitted.
|
Days 1 and 3 of Cycle 1 for a 21-day cycle (carboplatin was only dosed on Day 1 so there are no Day 3 Cmax values)
|
AUC0-inf of Etoposide and Free and Total Carboplatin in Cycle 1, Part 1
Time Frame: Days 1 and 3 of Cycle 1 for a 21-day cycle (carboplatin was only dosed on Day 1 so there are no Day 3 AUC0-inf values)
|
AUC0-inf of etoposide and free and total carboplatin in plasma were determined from individual concentration-time data by non-compartmental analysis methods.
The actual sampling times in relation to dosing were used.
|
Days 1 and 3 of Cycle 1 for a 21-day cycle (carboplatin was only dosed on Day 1 so there are no Day 3 AUC0-inf values)
|
Tmax of Etoposide and Free and Total Carboplatin in Cycle 1, Part 1
Time Frame: Days 1 and 3 of Cycle 1 for a 21-day cycle (carboplatin was only dosed on Day 1 so there are no Day 3 Tmax values)
|
Tmax of etoposide and free and total carboplatin in plasma was determined from individual concentration-time data by non-compartmental analysis methods.
The actual sampling times in relation to dosing were used.
|
Days 1 and 3 of Cycle 1 for a 21-day cycle (carboplatin was only dosed on Day 1 so there are no Day 3 Tmax values)
|
Duration of Severe (Grade 4) Neutropenia in Part 1
Time Frame: From randomization to the end of the treatment period (a minimum of 51 days up to a maximum of 379 days)
|
Severe (Grade 4) neutropenia was defined as at least 1 ANC value <0.5 × 10^9/L during the treatment period.
Within each cycle, the duration (days) of severe neutropenia was defined as the number of days from the date of the first ANC value of <0.5 × 10^9/L observed between start of cycle and end of cycle to the date of the first ANC value ≥0.5 × 10^9/L that met the following criteria: 1) occurred after the ANC value of <0.5 × 10^9/L and 2) no other ANC values <0.5 × 10^9/L occurred between this day and end of cycle.
The duration of severe neutropenia only included participants who had at least 1 severe neutropenia event in the cycle, and censoring rules were applied for unresolved severe neutropenia in a cycle.
For the treatment period, the overall duration of severe neutropenia was the median value among the durations from all cycles.
|
From randomization to the end of the treatment period (a minimum of 51 days up to a maximum of 379 days)
|
Occurrence of Severe (Grade 4) Neutropenia in Part 1
Time Frame: From randomization to the end of the treatment period (a minimum of 51 days up to a maximum of 379 days)
|
Severe (Grade 4) neutropenia was defined as at least 1 ANC value <0.5 × 10^9/L during the treatment period.
|
From randomization to the end of the treatment period (a minimum of 51 days up to a maximum of 379 days)
|
Occurrence of Febrile Neutropenia in Part 1
Time Frame: From randomization to the end of the treatment period (a minimum of 51 days up to a maximum of 379 days)
|
Each febrile neutropenia event (as defined by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events [CTCAE]) was captured as an AE.
The occurrence of febrile neutropenia was defined as at least 1 febrile neutropenia event during the treatment period.
For the treatment period, the total number of febrile neutropenia events was the number of febrile neutropenia events with a unique start date.
|
From randomization to the end of the treatment period (a minimum of 51 days up to a maximum of 379 days)
|
Duration of Grade 3/4 Neutropenia in Part 1
Time Frame: From randomization to the end of the treatment period (a minimum of 51 days up to a maximum of 379 days)
|
Grade 3/4 neutropenia was defined as at least 1 ANC value <1.0 × 10^9/L during the treatment period.
Within each cycle, duration (days) of Grade 3/4 neutropenia was defined as the number of days from the date of the first ANC value of <1.0 × 10^9/L observed between start of cycle and end of cycle to the date of the first ANC value ≥1.0 × 10^9/L that met the following criteria: 1) occurred after the ANC value of <1.0 × 10^9/L and 2) no other ANC values <1.0 × 10^9/L occurred between this day and end of cycle.
The duration of Grade 3/4 neutropenia only included participants who had at least 1 Grade 3/4 neutropenia event in the cycle, and censoring rules were applied for unresolved Grade 3/4 neutropenia in a cycle.
For the treatment period, the overall duration of Grade 3/4 neutropenia was the median value among the durations of Grade 3/4 neutropenia from all cycles.
|
From randomization to the end of the treatment period (a minimum of 51 days up to a maximum of 379 days)
|
Occurrence of Grade 3/4 Neutropenia in Part 1
Time Frame: From randomization to the end of the treatment period (a minimum of 51 days up to a maximum of 379 days)
|
Grade 3/4 neutropenia was defined as at least 1 ANC value <1.0 × 10^9/L during the treatment period.
|
From randomization to the end of the treatment period (a minimum of 51 days up to a maximum of 379 days)
|
Nadir of Absolute Neutrophil Count in Cycle 1, Part 1
Time Frame: From baseline to the end of Cycle 1
|
Cycle nadir was the lowest value for ANC that occurred between start of cycle and end of cycle and was less than the cycle baseline.
|
From baseline to the end of Cycle 1
|
Occurrence of Granulocyte-Colony Stimulating Factor (G-CSF) Administration in Part 1
Time Frame: From randomization to the end of the treatment period (a minimum of 51 days up to a maximum of 379 days)
|
Administration of G-CSF was collected with concomitant medications, which were coded using World Health Organization Drug Dictionary (WHO-DD) Version September 2017.
A cycle where G-CSF was administered concurrently was identified by comparing the start and stop dates of each administration of G-CSF to the start of cycle and end of cycle.
The occurrence of G-CSF administrations was defined as at least 1 cycle with G-CSF administrations during the treatment period.
For the treatment period, the total number of G-CSF administrations was the number of cycles with G-CSF administrations.
|
From randomization to the end of the treatment period (a minimum of 51 days up to a maximum of 379 days)
|
Occurrence of Red Blood Cell (RBC) Transfusion in Part 1
Time Frame: From randomization to the end of the treatment period (a minimum of 51 days up to a maximum of 379 days)
|
Within a cycle, a RBC transfusion event was defined as either 1) an actual RBC transfusion, or 2) eligible for RBC transfusion (defined as hemoglobin <8.0 g/dL).
The occurrence of RBC transfusions was defined as at least 1 cycle with RBC transfusion during the treatment period.
For the treatment period, the total number of RBC transfusions was the number of cycles with RBC transfusions.
|
From randomization to the end of the treatment period (a minimum of 51 days up to a maximum of 379 days)
|
Change From Baseline of Hemoglobin at the End of Cycle 6, Part 1
Time Frame: Baseline, Day 1, Day 3, Day 8, Day 10, and Day 15 of a 21-day cycle x 6
|
Blood samples were collected for local clinical laboratory assessment of hemoglobin levels.
|
Baseline, Day 1, Day 3, Day 8, Day 10, and Day 15 of a 21-day cycle x 6
|
Occurrence of Erythropoietin Stimulating Agent (ESA) Administration in Part 1
Time Frame: From randomization to the end of the treatment period (a minimum of 51 days up to a maximum of 379 days)
|
Administration of ESAs was collected with concomitant medications, which were coded using WHO-DD Version September 2017.
A cycle where an ESA was administered concurrently was identified by comparing the start and stop dates of each administration of an ESA to the start of cycle and end of cycle.
The occurrence of ESA administration was at least 1 cycle with an ESA administration during the treatment period.
For the treatment period, the total number of ESA administrations was the number of cycles with ESA administrations.
|
From randomization to the end of the treatment period (a minimum of 51 days up to a maximum of 379 days)
|
Occurrence of Platelet Transfusion in Part 1
Time Frame: From randomization to the end of the treatment period (a minimum of 51 days up to a maximum of 379 days)
|
Within a cycle, a platelet transfusion event was defined as either 1) an actual platelet transfusion, or 2) eligible for platelet transfusion (defined as a platelet count ≤10 × 10^9/L).
The occurrence of platelet transfusions was defined as at least 1 cycle with platelet transfusion during the treatment period.
For the treatment period, the total number of platelet transfusions was the number of cycles with platelet transfusions.
|
From randomization to the end of the treatment period (a minimum of 51 days up to a maximum of 379 days)
|
Change From Baseline of Platelet Count at the End of Cycle 6, Part 1
Time Frame: Baseline, Day 1, Day 3, Day 8, Day 10, and Day 15 of a 21-day cycle x 6
|
Blood samples were collected for local clinical laboratory assessment of platelet count.
|
Baseline, Day 1, Day 3, Day 8, Day 10, and Day 15 of a 21-day cycle x 6
|
Change From Baseline of Lymphocyte Count at the End of Cycle 6, Part 1
Time Frame: Baseline, Day 1, Day 3, Day 8, Day 10, and Day 15 of a 21-day cycle x 6
|
Blood samples were collected for local clinical laboratory assessment of lymphocyte count.
|
Baseline, Day 1, Day 3, Day 8, Day 10, and Day 15 of a 21-day cycle x 6
|
Occurrence of Dose Reduction in Part 1
Time Frame: From randomization to the end of the treatment period (a minimum of 51 days up to a maximum of 379 days)
|
Dose reductions were not permitted for trilaciclib, per study protocol.
Dose reductions for E/P were derived from changes in the protocol-specified dose on the dosing page and corresponded to the reductions for toxicity specified in the protocol.
No more than 2 dose reductions of E/P in total were allowed for any participant.
Simultaneous reductions in the doses of E/P were counted as 1 dose reduction.
For the treatment period, the total number of dose reductions was the number of cycles where there was at least 1 dose reduction.
|
From randomization to the end of the treatment period (a minimum of 51 days up to a maximum of 379 days)
|
Occurrence of Infectious SAEs in Part 1
Time Frame: From randomization to the end of the treatment period (a minimum of 51 days up to a maximum of 379 days)
|
SAEs were defined as any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose resulted in death, was life threatening, required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity or was a congenital anomaly/birth defect.
An infectious SAE was a serious event in the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) system organ class "infections and infestations" and a preferred term of anal abscess, bacteraemia, bronchitis, candida infection, chronic sinusitis, conjunctivitis, infection, influenza, nasopharyngitis, oral candidiasis, oral herpes, pharyngitis streptococcal, pneumonia, pneumonia bacterial, respiratory tract infection, sepsis, skin infection, upper respiratory tract infection, urinary tract infection, urosepsis or viral upper respiratory tract infection.
|
From randomization to the end of the treatment period (a minimum of 51 days up to a maximum of 379 days)
|
Occurrence of Pulmonary Infection SAE in Part 1
Time Frame: From randomization to the end of the treatment period (a minimum of 51 days up to a maximum of 379 days)
|
SAEs were defined as any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose resulted in death, was life threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity or was a congenital anomaly/birth defect.
A pulmonary infection SAE was a serious event in the MedDRA system organ class "infections and infestations" and a preferred term of bronchitis, influenza, pneumonia, pneumonia bacterial, respiratory tract infection, upper respiratory tract infection or viral upper respiratory tract infection.
|
From randomization to the end of the treatment period (a minimum of 51 days up to a maximum of 379 days)
|
Occurrence of IV Antibiotic Administration in Part 1
Time Frame: From randomization to the end of the treatment period (a minimum of 51 days up to a maximum of 379 days)
|
Intravenous antibiotic administration was collected with concomitant medications, which were coded using WHO-DD Version September 2017.
A cycle where IV antibiotic was administered concurrently was identified by comparing the start and stop dates of each administration of IV antibiotic to the start of cycle and end of cycle.
The occurrence of IV antibiotic administration was defined as at least 1 cycle with IV antibiotic administration during the treatment period.
For the treatment period, the total number of IV antibiotic administrations was the number of cycles with IV antibiotic administrations.
|
From randomization to the end of the treatment period (a minimum of 51 days up to a maximum of 379 days)
|
Time to First Major Adverse Hematologic Event (MAHE) in Part 1
Time Frame: From randomization to the end of the treatment period (a minimum of 51 days up to a maximum of 379 days)
|
MAHE was a composite endpoint incorporating the measurement of several clinically meaningful aspects of myelopreservation into a single endpoint.
The individual components for MAHE were hospitalization for a hematologic event, febrile neutropenia, death related to treatment, dose delay/reduction due to ANC or platelet counts, prolonged severe neutropenia (duration >5 days), RBC transfusion (actual or eligible) and platelet transfusion (actual or eligible).
Time to first occurrence of a MAHE event was defined as the first time to observe an interested event among all the components, starting from the first dose date of study drug administration.
|
From randomization to the end of the treatment period (a minimum of 51 days up to a maximum of 379 days)
|
Best Overall Tumor Response Based on Assessments in Part 1
Time Frame: Baseline, end of every two 21-day cycles, up until disease progression to a maximum of the time at least 70% overall survival (OS) events observed (a maximum of 4 years)
|
Tumor response was assessed by computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).
Overall visit response by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1 was derived programmatically using data from target lesions (TLs), non-target lesions (NTLs), & new lesions.
Tumor response data were used to determine each participant's time point response & best overall response (BOR).
Complete response (CR) was disappearance of all TLs, any pathological lymph nodes selected as TLs must have reduced in short axis to <10 mm.
Partial response (PR) was at least a 30% decrease from baseline in the sum of diameters of TLs, as long as criteria for progressive disease (PD) were not met.
PD was a ≥20% increase in the smallest sum of diameters of TLs since treatment started (including baseline) and an absolute increase of ≥5 mm.
Stable disease (SD) was neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD.
|
Baseline, end of every two 21-day cycles, up until disease progression to a maximum of the time at least 70% overall survival (OS) events observed (a maximum of 4 years)
|
Best Overall Tumor Response Based on Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR) Assessments in Part 1
Time Frame: Baseline, end of every two 21-day cycles, up until disease progression to a maximum of the time at least 70% OS events observed (a maximum of 4 years)
|
Tumor response was assessed by CT or MRI.
Overall visit response by RECIST v1.1 was determined by BICR.
Tumor response data were used to determine each participant's time point response & BOR.
CR was disappearance of all TLs, any pathological lymph nodes selected as TLs must have reduced in short axis to <10 mm.
PR was at least a 30% decrease from baseline in the sum of diameters of TLs, as long as criteria for PD were not met.
PD was a ≥20% increase in the smallest sum of diameters of TLs since treatment started (including baseline) and an absolute increase of ≥5 mm.
SD was neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD.
|
Baseline, end of every two 21-day cycles, up until disease progression to a maximum of the time at least 70% OS events observed (a maximum of 4 years)
|
Progression Free Survival (PFS) Based on Assessments in Part 1
Time Frame: Baseline, end of every two 21-day cycles, up until disease progression to a maximum of the time at least 70% OS events observed (a maximum of 4 years)
|
Tumor response was assessed by CT or MRI.
PFS was defined as the time (months) from date of first dose date of study drug for participants in Part 1 until date of documented disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first.
More specifically, PFS was determined using all the assessment data up until the last evaluable visit prior to or on the date of i) disease progression as defined by RECIST 1.1 or by clinical criteria as determined by the investigator; or ii) withdrawal of consent; or iii) receiving subsequent anticancer therapy, whichever was earlier.
For PFS determined using response data derived programmatically, either clinical progression or progression by RECIST (whichever came first) was considered.
Median and inter-quartile range of PFS were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method.
|
Baseline, end of every two 21-day cycles, up until disease progression to a maximum of the time at least 70% OS events observed (a maximum of 4 years)
|
OS in Part 1
Time Frame: Baseline up until death or a maximum of the time at least 70% OS events observed (a maximum of 4 years)
|
OS was calculated as the time (months) from date of first dose of study drug for participants in Part 1 to the date of death due to any cause.
Participants who did not die during the study were censored at the date last known to be alive.
Participants lacking data beyond the day of first dose of study drug had their survival time censored at day of first dose of study drug.
OS was not censored if a participant received other anti-tumor treatments after the study drugs.
Median and inter-quartile range of OS were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method.
|
Baseline up until death or a maximum of the time at least 70% OS events observed (a maximum of 4 years)
|
Occurrence of Severe (Grade 4) Neutropenia in Part 2
Time Frame: From randomization to the end of the treatment period (a minimum of 51 days up to a maximum of 379 days)
|
Severe (Grade 4) neutropenia was defined as at least 1 ANC value <0.5 × 10^9/L during the treatment period.
|
From randomization to the end of the treatment period (a minimum of 51 days up to a maximum of 379 days)
|
Occurrence of Febrile Neutropenia in Part 2
Time Frame: From randomization to the end of the treatment period (a minimum of 51 days up to a maximum of 379 days)
|
Each febrile neutropenia event (as defined by CTCAE) was captured as an AE.
The occurrence of febrile neutropenia was defined as at least 1 febrile neutropenia event during the treatment period.
For the treatment period, the total number of febrile neutropenia events was the number of febrile neutropenia events with a unique start date.
|
From randomization to the end of the treatment period (a minimum of 51 days up to a maximum of 379 days)
|
Duration of Grade 3/4 Neutropenia in Part 2
Time Frame: From randomization to the end of the treatment period (a minimum of 51 days up to a maximum of 379 days)
|
Grade 3/4 neutropenia was defined as at least 1 ANC value <1.0 × 10^9/L during the treatment period.
Within each cycle, duration (days) of Grade 3/4 neutropenia was defined as the number of days from the date of the first ANC value of <1.0 × 10^9/L observed between start of cycle and end of cycle to the date of the first ANC value ≥1.0 × 10^9/L that met the following criteria: 1) occurred after the ANC value of <1.0 × 10^9/L and 2) no other ANC values <1.0 × 10^9/L occurred between this day and end of cycle.
The duration of Grade 3/4 neutropenia only included participants who had at least 1 Grade 3/4 neutropenia event in the cycle, and censoring rules were applied for unresolved Grade 3/4 neutropenia in a cycle.
For the treatment period, the overall duration of Grade 3/4 neutropenia was the median value among the durations of Grade 3/4 neutropenia from all cycles.
|
From randomization to the end of the treatment period (a minimum of 51 days up to a maximum of 379 days)
|
Occurrence of Grade 3/4 Neutropenia in Part 2
Time Frame: From randomization to the end of the treatment period (a minimum of 51 days up to a maximum of 379 days)
|
Grade 3/4 neutropenia was defined as at least 1 ANC value <1.0 × 10^9/L during the treatment period.
|
From randomization to the end of the treatment period (a minimum of 51 days up to a maximum of 379 days)
|
Nadir of Absolute Neutrophil Count in Cycle 1, Part 2
Time Frame: From baseline to the end of Cycle 1
|
Cycle nadir was the lowest value for ANC that occurred between start of cycle and end of cycle and was less than the cycle baseline.
|
From baseline to the end of Cycle 1
|
Occurrence of G-CSF Administration in Part 2
Time Frame: From randomization to the end of the treatment period (a minimum of 51 days up to a maximum of 379 days)
|
Administration of G-CSF was collected with concomitant medications, which were coded using WHO-DD Version September 2017.
A cycle where G-CSF was administered concurrently was identified bycomparing the start and stop dates of each administration of G-CSF to the start of cycle and end of cycle.
The occurrence of G-CSF administrations was defined as at least 1 cycle with G-CSF administrations during the treatment period.
For the treatment period, the total number of G-CSF administrations was the number of cycles with G-CSF administrations.
|
From randomization to the end of the treatment period (a minimum of 51 days up to a maximum of 379 days)
|
Occurrence of RBC Transfusion in Part 2
Time Frame: From randomization to the end of the treatment period (a minimum of 51 days up to a maximum of 379 days)
|
Within a cycle, a RBC transfusion event was defined as either 1) an actual RBC transfusion, or 2) eligible for RBC transfusion (defined as hemoglobin <8.0 g/dL).
The occurrence of RBC transfusions was defined as at least 1 cycle with RBC transfusion during the treatment period.
For the treatment period, the total number of RBC transfusions was the number of cycles with RBC transfusions.
If a participant did not have any RBC transfusions, they were assigned a value of 0.
|
From randomization to the end of the treatment period (a minimum of 51 days up to a maximum of 379 days)
|
Change From Baseline of Hemoglobin at the End of Cycle 6, Part 2
Time Frame: Baseline, Day 1, Day 3, Day 8, Day 10, and Day 15 of a 21-day cycle x 6
|
Blood samples were collected for local clinical laboratory assessment of hemoglobin levels.
|
Baseline, Day 1, Day 3, Day 8, Day 10, and Day 15 of a 21-day cycle x 6
|
Occurrence of ESA Administration in Part 2
Time Frame: From randomization to the end of the treatment period (a minimum of 51 days up to a maximum of 379 days)
|
Administration of ESAs was collected with concomitant medications, which were coded using WHO-DD Version September 2017.
A cycle where an ESA was administered concurrently was identified by comparing the start and stop dates of each administration of an ESA to the start of cycle and end of cycle.
The occurrence of ESA administration was at least 1 cycle with an ESA administration during the treatment period.
For the treatment period, the total number of ESA administrations was the number of cycles with ESA administrations.
|
From randomization to the end of the treatment period (a minimum of 51 days up to a maximum of 379 days)
|
Occurrence of Platelet Transfusion in Part 2
Time Frame: From randomization to the end of the treatment period (a minimum of 51 days up to a maximum of 379 days)
|
Within a cycle, a platelet transfusion event was defined as either 1) an actual platelet transfusion, or 2) eligible for platelet transfusion (defined as a platelet count ≤10 × 10^9/L).
The occurrence of platelet transfusions was defined as at least 1 cycle with platelet transfusion during the treatment period.
For the treatment period, the total number of platelet transfusions was the number of cycles with platelet transfusions.
|
From randomization to the end of the treatment period (a minimum of 51 days up to a maximum of 379 days)
|
Change From Baseline of Platelet Count at the End of Cycle 6, Part 2
Time Frame: Baseline, Day 1, Day 3, Day 8, Day 10, and Day 15 of a 21-day cycle x 6
|
Blood samples were collected for local clinical laboratory assessment of platelet count.
|
Baseline, Day 1, Day 3, Day 8, Day 10, and Day 15 of a 21-day cycle x 6
|
Change From Baseline of Lymphocyte Count at the End of Cycle 6, Part 2
Time Frame: Baseline, Day 1, Day 3, Day 8, Day 10, and Day 15 of a 21-day cycle x 6
|
Blood samples were collected for local clinical laboratory assessment of lymphocyte count.
|
Baseline, Day 1, Day 3, Day 8, Day 10, and Day 15 of a 21-day cycle x 6
|
Occurrence of Dose Reduction in Part 2
Time Frame: From randomization to the end of the treatment period (a minimum of 51 days up to a maximum of 379 days)
|
Dose reductions were not permitted for trilaciclib, per study protocol.
Dose reductions for E/P were derived from changes in the protocol-specified dose on the dosing page and corresponded to the reductions for toxicity specified in the protocol.
No more than 2 dose reductions of E/P in total were allowed for any participant.
Simultaneous reductions in the doses of E/P were counted as 1 dose reduction.
For the treatment period, the total number of dose reductions was the number of cycles where there was at least 1 dose reduction.
|
From randomization to the end of the treatment period (a minimum of 51 days up to a maximum of 379 days)
|
Occurrence of Infectious SAEs in Part 2
Time Frame: From randomization to the end of the treatment period (a minimum of 51 days up to a maximum of 379 days)
|
SAEs were defined as any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose resulted in death, was life threatening, required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity or was a congenital anomaly/birth defect.
An infectious SAE was a serious event in the MedDRA system organ class "infections and infestations" and a preferred term of anal abscess, bacteraemia, bronchitis, candida infection, chronic sinusitis, conjunctivitis, infection, influenza, nasopharyngitis, oral candidiasis, oral herpes, pharyngitis streptococcal, pneumonia, pneumonia bacterial, respiratory tract infection, sepsis, skin infection, upper respiratory tract infection, urinary tract infection, urosepsis or viral upper respiratory tract infection.
|
From randomization to the end of the treatment period (a minimum of 51 days up to a maximum of 379 days)
|
Occurrence of Pulmonary Infection SAE in Part 2
Time Frame: From randomization to the end of the treatment period (a minimum of 51 days up to a maximum of 379 days)
|
SAEs were defined as any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose resulted in death, was life threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity or was a congenital anomaly/birth defect.
A pulmonary infection SAE was a serious event in the MedDRA system organ class "infections and infestations" and a preferred term of bronchitis, influenza, pneumonia, pneumonia bacterial, respiratory tract infection, upper respiratory tract infection or viral upper respiratory tract infection.
|
From randomization to the end of the treatment period (a minimum of 51 days up to a maximum of 379 days)
|
Occurrence of IV Antibiotic Administration in Part 2
Time Frame: From randomization to the end of the treatment period (a minimum of 51 days up to a maximum of 379 days)
|
Intravenous antibiotic administration was collected with concomitant medications, which were coded using WHO-DD Version September 2017.
A cycle where IV antibiotic was administered concurrently was identified by comparing the start and stop dates of each administration of IV antibiotic to the start of cycle and end of cycle.
The occurrence of IV antibiotic administration was defined as at least 1 cycle with IV antibiotic administration during the treatment period.
For the treatment period, the total number of IV antibiotic administrations was the number of cycles with IV antibiotic administrations.
|
From randomization to the end of the treatment period (a minimum of 51 days up to a maximum of 379 days)
|
Time to First MAHE in Part 2
Time Frame: From randomization to the end of the treatment period (a minimum of 51 days up to a maximum of 379 days)
|
MAHE was a composite endpoint incorporating the measurement of several clinically meaningful aspects of myelopreservation into a single endpoint.
The individual components for MAHE were hospitalization for a hematologic event, febrile neutropenia, death related to treatment, dose delay/reduction due to ANC or platelet counts, prolonged severe neutropenia (duration >5 days), RBC transfusion (actual or eligible) and platelet transfusion (actual or eligible).
Time to first occurrence of a MAHE event was defined as the first time to observe an interested event among all the components, starting from the first dose date of study drug administration.
|
From randomization to the end of the treatment period (a minimum of 51 days up to a maximum of 379 days)
|
Best Overall Tumor Response Based on Assessments in Part 2
Time Frame: Baseline, end of every two 21-day cycles, up until disease progression to a maximum of the time at least 70% OS events observed (a maximum of 4 years)
|
Tumor response was assessed by CT or MRI.
Overall visit response by RECIST v1.1 was derived programmatically using data from TLs, NTLs, & new lesions.
Tumor response data were used to determine each participant's time point response & BOR.
CR was disappearance of all TLs, any pathological lymph nodes selected as TLs must have reduced in short axis to <10 mm.
PR was at least a 30% decrease from baseline in the sum of diameters of TLs, as long as criteria for PD were not met.
PD was a ≥20% increase in the smallest sum of diameters of TLs since treatment started (including baseline) and an absolute increase of ≥5 mm.
SD was neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD.
|
Baseline, end of every two 21-day cycles, up until disease progression to a maximum of the time at least 70% OS events observed (a maximum of 4 years)
|
Best Overall Tumor Response Based on BICR Assessments in Part 2
Time Frame: Baseline, end of every two 21-day cycles, up until disease progression to a maximum of the time at least 70% OS events observed (a maximum of 4 years)
|
Tumor response was assessed by CT or MRI.
Overall visit response by RECIST v1.1 was determined by BICR.
Tumor response data were used to determine each participant's time point response & BOR.
CR was disappearance of all TLs, any pathological lymph nodes selected as TLs must have reduced in short axis to <10 mm.
PR was at least a 30% decrease from baseline in the sum of diameters of TLs, as long as criteria for PD were not met.
PD was a ≥20% increase in the smallest sum of diameters of TLs since treatment started (including baseline) and an absolute increase of ≥5 mm.
SD was neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD.
|
Baseline, end of every two 21-day cycles, up until disease progression to a maximum of the time at least 70% OS events observed (a maximum of 4 years)
|
PFS Based on Assessments in Part 2
Time Frame: Baseline, end of every two 21-day cycles, up until disease progression to a maximum of the time at least 70% OS events observed (a maximum of 4 years)
|
Tumor response was assessed by CT or MRI.
PFS was defined as the time (months) from date of first dose date of study drug for participants in Part 1 until date of documented disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first.
More specifically, PFS was determined using all the assessment data up until the last evaluable visit prior to or on the date of i) disease progression as defined by RECIST 1.1 or by clinical criteria as determined by the investigator; or ii) withdrawal of consent; or iii) receiving subsequent anticancer therapy, whichever was earlier.
For PFS determined using response data derived programmatically, either clinical progression or progression by RECIST (whichever came first) was considered.
Median and inter-quartile range of PFS were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method.
|
Baseline, end of every two 21-day cycles, up until disease progression to a maximum of the time at least 70% OS events observed (a maximum of 4 years)
|
OS in Part 2
Time Frame: Baseline up until death or a maximum of the time at least 70% OS events observed (a maximum of 4 years)
|
OS was calculated as the time (months) from date of first dose of study drug for participants in Part 2 to the date of death due to any cause.
Participants who did not die during the study were censored at the date last known to be alive.
Participants lacking data beyond the day of first dose of study drug had their survival time censored at day of first dose of study drug.
OS was not censored if a participant received other anti-tumor treatments after the study drugs.
Median and inter-quartile range of OS were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method.
|
Baseline up until death or a maximum of the time at least 70% OS events observed (a maximum of 4 years)
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Hussein M, Maglakelidze M, Richards DA, Sabatini M, Gersten TA, Lerro K, Sinielnikov I, Spira A, Pritchett Y, Antal JM, Malik R, Beck JT. Myeloprotective Effects of Trilaciclib Among Patients with Small Cell Lung Cancer at Increased Risk of Chemotherapy-Induced Myelosuppression: Pooled Results from Three Phase 2, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Studies. Cancer Manag Res. 2021 Aug 9;13:6207-6218. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S313045. eCollection 2021.
- Ferrarotto R, Anderson I, Medgyasszay B, Garcia-Campelo MR, Edenfield W, Feinstein TM, Johnson JM, Kalmadi S, Lammers PE, Sanchez-Hernandez A, Pritchett Y, Morris SR, Malik RK, Csoszi T. Trilaciclib prior to chemotherapy reduces the usage of supportive care interventions for chemotherapy-induced myelosuppression in patients with small cell lung cancer: Pooled analysis of three randomized phase 2 trials. Cancer Med. 2021 Sep;10(17):5748-5756. doi: 10.1002/cam4.4089. Epub 2021 Aug 18.
- Li C, Hart L, Owonikoko TK, Aljumaily R, Rocha Lima CM, Conkling PR, Webb RT, Jotte RM, Schuster S, Edenfield WJ, Smith DA, Sale M, Roberts PJ, Malik RK, Sorrentino JA. Trilaciclib dose selection: an integrated pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic analysis of preclinical data and Phase Ib/IIa studies in patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2021 May;87(5):689-700. doi: 10.1007/s00280-021-04239-9. Epub 2021 Feb 17.
- Lai AY, Sorrentino JA, Dragnev KH, Weiss JM, Owonikoko TK, Rytlewski JA, Hood J, Yang Z, Malik RK, Strum JC, Roberts PJ. CDK4/6 inhibition enhances antitumor efficacy of chemotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitor combinations in preclinical models and enhances T-cell activation in patients with SCLC receiving chemotherapy. J Immunother Cancer. 2020 Oct;8(2):e000847. doi: 10.1136/jitc-2020-000847.
- Weiss JM, Csoszi T, Maglakelidze M, Hoyer RJ, Beck JT, Domine Gomez M, Lowczak A, Aljumaily R, Rocha Lima CM, Boccia RV, Hanna W, Nikolinakos P, Chiu VK, Owonikoko TK, Schuster SR, Hussein MA, Richards DA, Sawrycki P, Bulat I, Hamm JT, Hart LL, Adler S, Antal JM, Lai AY, Sorrentino JA, Yang Z, Malik RK, Morris SR, Roberts PJ, Dragnev KH; G1T28-02 Study Group. Myelopreservation with the CDK4/6 inhibitor trilaciclib in patients with small-cell lung cancer receiving first-line chemotherapy: a phase Ib/randomized phase II trial. Ann Oncol. 2019 Oct 1;30(10):1613-1621. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdz278.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (ACTUAL)
Primary Completion (ACTUAL)
Study Completion (ACTUAL)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (ESTIMATE)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Respiratory Tract Diseases
- Neoplasms
- Lung Diseases
- Neoplasms by Site
- Respiratory Tract Neoplasms
- Thoracic Neoplasms
- Carcinoma, Bronchogenic
- Bronchial Neoplasms
- Lung Neoplasms
- Small Cell Lung Carcinoma
- Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action
- Enzyme Inhibitors
- Antineoplastic Agents
- Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic
- Topoisomerase II Inhibitors
- Topoisomerase Inhibitors
- Carboplatin
- Etoposide
Other Study ID Numbers
- G1T28-02
- 2016-001583-11 (EUDRACT_NUMBER)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Small Cell Lung Cancer
-
University of Wisconsin, MadisonNational Cancer Institute (NCI)CompletedStage IIIA Non-small Cell Lung Cancer | Stage IIIB Non-small Cell Lung Cancer | Extensive Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer | Recurrent Small Cell Lung Cancer | Recurrent Non-small Cell Lung Cancer | Stage IV Non-small Cell Lung Cancer | Healthy, no Evidence of Disease | Limited Stage Small Cell Lung... and other conditionsUnited States
-
AIO-Studien-gGmbHBristol-Myers Squibb; Eli Lilly and Company; Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC; Pfizer; Gilead... and other collaboratorsRecruitingSmall-cell Lung Cancer | Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Metastatic | Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Stage I | Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) | Non Small Cell Lung Cancer Stage III | Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Stage IIGermany
-
WindMIL TherapeuticsBristol-Myers SquibbTerminatedNSCLC | Lung Cancer | Lung Cancer Metastatic | Lung Cancer, Non-small Cell | Non Small Cell Lung Cancer | Non-small Cell Lung Cancer | Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Metastatic | Non Small Cell Lung Cancer MetastaticUnited States
-
National Cancer Institute (NCI)CompletedStage IIIA Non-small Cell Lung Cancer | Stage IIIB Non-small Cell Lung Cancer | Extensive Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer | Recurrent Small Cell Lung Cancer | Recurrent Non-small Cell Lung Cancer | Stage IV Non-small Cell Lung CancerUnited States
-
University of California, San FranciscoAstraZenecaActive, not recruitingStage IIIA Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer | Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer | Stage IA Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer | Stage IB Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer | Stage II Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer | Stage IIA Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer | Stage IIB Non-Small Cell Lung CancerUnited States
-
Washington University School of MedicineMerck Sharp & Dohme LLCWithdrawnNSCLC | Non Small Cell Lung Cancer | Non-small Cell Lung Cancer | Small Cell Lung Extensive Stage
-
Wake Forest University Health SciencesNational Cancer Institute (NCI)CompletedTobacco Use Disorder | Stage IIIA Non-small Cell Lung Cancer | Stage IIIB Non-small Cell Lung Cancer | Recurrent Small Cell Lung Cancer | Limited Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer | Stage IA Non-small Cell Lung Cancer | Stage IB Non-small Cell Lung Cancer | Stage IIA Non-small Cell Lung Cancer | Stage IIB...United States
-
National Cancer Institute (NCI)TerminatedStage IIIA Non-small Cell Lung Cancer | Stage IA Non-small Cell Lung Cancer | Stage IB Non-small Cell Lung Cancer | Stage IIA Non-small Cell Lung Cancer | Stage IIB Non-small Cell Lung CancerUnited States
-
Peking Union Medical College HospitalRecruitingNon Small Cell Lung Cancer Stage III | Small-Cell Lung CancerChina
-
University of Maryland, BaltimoreUniversity of Maryland, College ParkTerminatedNon-Small Cell Lung Cancer, Small Cell Lung Cancer | Platinum Responsive MalignanciesUnited States
Clinical Trials on Placebo
-
SamA Pharmaceutical Co., LtdUnknownAcute Bronchitis | Acute Upper Respiratory Tract InfectionKorea, Republic of
-
National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)CompletedCannabis UseUnited States
-
AstraZenecaParexel; Spandauer Damm 130; 14050; Berlin, GermanyCompletedMale Subjects With Type II Diabetes (T2DM)Germany
-
Heptares Therapeutics LimitedCompletedPharmacokinetics | Safety IssuesUnited Kingdom
-
GlaxoSmithKlineCompletedPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveUnited Kingdom, Netherlands
-
ItalfarmacoCompletedBecker Muscular DystrophyNetherlands, Italy
-
Shijiazhuang Yiling Pharmaceutical Co. LtdXuanwu Hospital, BeijingCompleted
-
GlaxoSmithKlineCompletedInfections, BacterialUnited States
-
West Penn Allegheny Health SystemCompletedAsthma | Allergic RhinitisUnited States