EMG at Performing ULTN 1 in Breast Cancer Patients

November 5, 2015 updated by: IRENE DE LA ROSA DÍAZ, University of Alcala

Evoked EMG Muscle Activity at Performing ULTN 1 in Breast Cancer Patients

Upper limb neural mechanosensitivity is a painful disturbance that breast cancer patients often undergo following axillary surgery. It is assessed by the upper limb neurodynamic test for the median nerve, called upper limb neurodynamic test 1 (ULNT1). Design: A matched case-control observational study. Objective: to check the increased upper limb mechanosensitivity by shoulder range of motion (ROM) during ULNT1 and to determine, for the first time, the evoked electromyographic (EMG) muscle activity. Participants: 62 cases who underwent breast cancer surgery and 64 matched control women. Setting: Torrejon Hospital, Physical Therapy Department, Madrid (Spain). Intervention: To record EMG muscle activity during ULNT1 performance and to measure shoulder ROM. Key outcomes: mechanosensitivity, breast cancer, pain, EMG, shoulder ROM, median nerve.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Upper limb neural mechanosensitivity is a painful disturbance that breast cancer patients often undergo following axillary surgery. It is assessed by the upper limb neurodynamic test for the median nerve, called upper limb neurodynamic test 1 (ULNT1).A neural provocation test is a sequence of movements designed to assess the mechanics and physiology of part of the nervous system by elongating the length of the nerve bedding and by increasing the pressure in and around the peripheral nerve .The most reliable test to assess the upper limb neural mechanosensitivity is the neural provocation test for the median nerve, called upper limb neurodynamic test 1 (ULNT1). This test consists of depressing shoulder girdle in a neutral position, shoulder abduction and lateral rotation, elbow extension, forearm supination and wrist extension. Cervical contralateral lateral flexion may be included to further increase the loading of the brachial plexus and, as a sensitizing maneuver, to differentiate structurally between neural and non-neural involvement. The ULNT1 is considered as positive when symptoms are reproduced on affected upper limb, or side-to-side differences in ROM, or symptoms modified by lateral neck side-bending. Likewise, It is also necessary to assess the EMG activity of the involved muscles to verify the early and increased protective muscle response suggested throughout the neural strain performance.

It is also necessary to assess the EMG activity of the involved muscles to verify the early and increased protective muscle response suggested throughout the neural strain performance. Design: A matched case-control observational study. Objective: to check the increased upper limb mechanosensitivity by shoulder ROM during ULNT1 and to determine, for the first time, the evoked EMG muscle activity. Participants: 62 cases who underwent breast cancer surgery and 64 matched control women. Setting: Torrejon Hospital, Physical Therapy Department, Madrid (Spain). Intervention: To record EMG muscle activity during ULNT1 performance and to measure shoulder ROM. Key outcomes: mechanosensitivity, breast cancer, pain, EMG, shoulder ROM, median nerve.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

124

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

40 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • No undergo breast cancer.
  • To be the age and the sema dominant arm than one of the cases.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Current painful conditions involving their neck or dominant upper-extremity.
  • Chronic pain conditions (i.e. Fibromyalgia).
  • Current use of pain relievers.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: case group 1: ALND

Inclusion criteria: unilateral breast cancer surgery with Axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) during the last year and a half. Exclusion criteria: bilateral breast cancer, ipsilateral shoulder pathology, neuropathy.

Procedure: ULNT 1 and EMG recording.

While the ULNT 1 was performing, EMG muscle activity form biceps brachii and triceps brachii were recorded. The maneuver was stopped to measure abduction, external rotation and elbow flexion range of motion (ROM) with a goniometer. Three measurements were performed: measure 1) when the first sense of tightness perceived by the subject appeared; measure 2) when evoked muscle activity increased on EMG record; measure 3) when sense of final resistance perceived by the investigator appeared. Considering the increase of symptoms with contralateral or decrease of symptoms with ipsilateral cervical side bending as mandatory positivity criterion.
Experimental: case group 2: SLNB

Inclusion criteria: unilateral breast cancer surgery with Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy (SLNB) during the last year and a half. Exclusion criteria: bilateral breast cancer, ipsilateral shoulder pathology, neuropathy.

Procedure: ULNT 1 and EMG recording

While the ULNT 1 was performing, EMG muscle activity form biceps brachii and triceps brachii were recorded. The maneuver was stopped to measure abduction, external rotation and elbow flexion range of motion (ROM) with a goniometer. Three measurements were performed: measure 1) when the first sense of tightness perceived by the subject appeared; measure 2) when evoked muscle activity increased on EMG record; measure 3) when sense of final resistance perceived by the investigator appeared. Considering the increase of symptoms with contralateral or decrease of symptoms with ipsilateral cervical side bending as mandatory positivity criterion.
Active Comparator: control group

Matched by age and dominant arm to each case. Exclusion criteria: current painful conditions involving their neck or dominant upper-extremity, and chronic pain conditions or use of pain relievers.

Procedure: ULNT 1 and EMG recording.

While the ULNT 1 was performing, EMG muscle activity form biceps brachii and triceps brachii were recorded. The maneuver was stopped to measure abduction, external rotation and elbow flexion range of motion (ROM) with a goniometer. Three measurements were performed: measure 1) when the first sense of tightness perceived by the subject appeared; measure 2) when evoked muscle activity increased on EMG record; measure 3) when sense of final resistance perceived by the investigator appeared. Considering the increase of symptoms with contralateral or decrease of symptoms with ipsilateral cervical side bending as mandatory positivity criterion.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Increased evoked EMG muscle activity
Time Frame: 5 min
Intensity of the evoked muscle activity from biceps brachii and triceps brachii muscles by EMG recording
5 min

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Upper limb range of motion restrictions
Time Frame: 15 min
degrees of range of motion of three movements: shoulder abduction, shoulder external rotation and elbow flexion.
15 min

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: María Torres-Lacomba, Doctor, Universidad Alcala

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 15, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 5, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

November 6, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

November 6, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 5, 2015

Last Verified

November 1, 2015

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • IDLR1985

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Physiotherapy

Clinical Trials on ULNT 1 and EMG recording

3
Subscribe