Eosinophilic Esophagitis Intervention Trial-1 Food vs. 4 Food Elimination Diet Followed by Swallowed Glucocorticoids

Eosinophilic Esophagitis (EoE) Intervention Trial-Randomized 1 Food Elimination vs. 4 Food Elimination Diet Followed by Swallowed Glucocorticoids

The purpose of this interventional study is to test and compare the effectiveness of two elimination diets-the 1-food elimination diet (1FED, milk only) and the 4-food elimination diet (4FED, milk, egg, wheat, and soy) for eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). The study will also test the effectiveness of swallowed glucocorticoid therapy in some of the study participants for whom diet therapy was not effective.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This study will consist of two phases, plus a screening period. During the screening period, subject eligibility for the study will be determined. During Phase 1, qualified participants will be randomly assigned to one of two elimination diet therapies--the 1FED or the 4FED. Participants will remain on the assigned dietary therapy for 12 weeks. At the end of 12 weeks of therapy, esophageal biopsies from participant's standard of care (i.e. normal, routine care) endoscopy will be evaluated to determine disease status. Participants whose EoE is in remission (i.e. <15 eos/hpf) will be done with the study.

Participants whose EoE is still active (i.e. ≥15 eos/hpf) will continue into Phase 2 of the study. During Phase 2, participants who were on 1FED in Phase 1 will receive 4FED therapy for 12 weeks, and participants who were on 4FED during Phase 1 will receive swallowed glucocorticoid therapy for 12 weeks. At the end of 12 weeks of therapy, esophageal biopsies from participant's standard of care (i.e. normal, routine care) endoscopy will be evaluated to determine disease status.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

67

Phase

  • Phase 2
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ohio
      • Cincinnati, Ohio, United States, 45229
        • Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

6 years to 17 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Have diagnosis of EoE (based on consensus criteria)
  • Are aged 6 to 17 years
  • Have histologically confirmed active disease >15 eosinophils/hpf in either distal or proximal esophagus within 12 weeks of screening visit
  • Proton Pump Inhibitor (PPI) confirmation
  • Symptomatic (have experienced symptoms within the last month prior to enrollment)
  • Has a negative urine pregnancy test at screening if of childbearing potential. Females of childbearing potential must have a negative urine pregnancy test (β-hCG) prior to enrollment into the study (i.e., at screening). Subsequently, these participants must agree to use adequate birth control measures (e.g., condom, oral/injectable/subcutaneous contraceptives, intrauterine device, or sexual abstinence) during the study and for at least one month after the last dose of study drug which will be documented in the source documents.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Have been treated with topical swallowed steroids within the last 2 months or systemic steroids within the past 3 months
  • Have eosinophilia in segments of the GI tract other than the esophagus
  • Have been diagnosed with a GI malabsorption disorder (i.e., Inflammatory bowel disease, Crohn's disease) or Celiac disease
  • Are currently on dietary therapy avoiding milk
  • Have concurrent H pylori gastritis or parasitic infection
  • Are unable to obtain esophagogastroduodenoscopy with esophageal biopsies at Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center (CCHMC) or other participating institution within 4 weeks of study completion
  • Have previously failed (in a clinical trial setting) dietary therapy with one of these regimens or topical steroid treatment with fluticasone at a total dose of 1760 mcg per day.
  • Have definitely responded (in a clinical trial setting) to either dietary therapy avoiding these antigens or to swallowed fluticasone at a total dose of 1760 mcg per day
  • Are concurrently receiving any of the prohibited medications listed in Table 2
  • On immunotherapy for pollen (if not on maintenance therapy) or immunoglobulin E (IgE)-mediated food allergy.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: 1FED
1-food elimination diet: Participants eliminate milk from the diet in Phase 1
Participants eliminate milk from the diet for 12 weeks
Other Names:
  • 1FED
Active Comparator: 4FED
4-food elimination diet: Participants eliminate milk, egg, wheat, soy from the diet in Phase 1
Participants eliminate milk, egg, wheat, soy from the diet for 12 weeks
Other Names:
  • 4FED
Other: 1FED Non-Responders (4FED)
Participants that fail to respond to 1FED in Phase 1 eliminate milk, egg, wheat, soy from the diet in Phase 2
Participants that fail to respond to 1FED in phase 1 eliminate milk, egg, wheat, soy from the diet for 12 weeks in Phase 2
Other: 4FED Non-Responders (SGC)
Participants that fail to respond to 4FED in Phase 1 administer swallowed glucocorticosteroids (Flovent HFA) 800 mcg twice daily in Phase 2
Participants that fail to respond to 4FED in phase 1 administer swallowed glucocorticosteroids (Flovent HFA) 800 mcg twice daily for 12 weeks in Phase 2

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline in Pediatric EoE Symptom Score Version 2.0 (PEESS V2.0) at 12 Weeks
Time Frame: Baseline and 12 weeks
The PEESS V2.0 questionnaire captures EoE-specific symptoms (dysphagia, gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD), nausea/vomiting, and pain) as reported by children with EoE (8-18 years of age) and their parents (for children 2-18 years of age). The range for PEESS v2.0 scores is 0 to 100, with a higher score being indicative of more frequent and/or severe symptoms. Scores were obtained at baseline and 12 weeks. Change in score is defined as total score at 12 weeks minus total score at baseline. The parent-proxy PEESS total score change from pre-treatment to post-treatment is the primary efficacy endpoint. 1FED vs 4FED changes are compared. A reduction in score (negative change) is indicative of a reduction in symptoms.
Baseline and 12 weeks
Within-group Comparisons (Baseline v. Week 12) of PEESS V2.0 Scores
Time Frame: Baseline and 12 weeks
The PEESS V2.0 questionnaire captures EoE-specific symptoms. The range for PEESS v2.0 scores is 0 to 100, with a higher score being indicative of more frequent and/or severe symptoms. Baseline vs Week 12 scores are compared within each treatment group (1FED and 4FED).
Baseline and 12 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percent of Participants in Histologic Remission (<15 Eosinophils Per High Power Field) at 12 Weeks
Time Frame: 12 weeks
Percent of participants in remission in 1FED and 4FED groups. Remission is defined as clinical esophageal peak eosinophil count < 15 eosinophils per high power field (eos/hpf). Complete remission is defined as ≤ 1 peak eos/hpf and partial remission as 2 - 14 peak eos/hpf.
12 weeks
Percent of Participants on Swallowed Glucocorticoids (SGC) in Histologic Remission (<15 Eos/Hpf) at 12 Weeks in Phase 2
Time Frame: 12 weeks
Percent of 4FED non-responders on SGC in Phase 2 in histologic remission. Remission is defined as esophageal peak eosinophil count < 15 eosinophils per high power field (eos/hpf). Complete remission is defined as ≤ 1 peak eos/hpf and partial remission as 2 - 14 peak eos/hpf.
12 weeks
Percent of 1FED Non-responders on 4FED in Histologic Remission (<15 Eos/Hpf) at 12 Weeks in Phase 2
Time Frame: 12 weeks
Percent of 1FED non-responders on 4FED in histologic remission in phase 2. Remission is defined as esophageal peak eosinophil count < 15 eosinophils per high powered field. Complete remission is defined as ≤ 1 peak eos/hpf and partial remission as 2 - 14 peak eos/hpf.
12 weeks
Change From Baseline in Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory Version 3.0 EoE Module (PedsQL 3.0 EoE) at 12 Weeks
Time Frame: Baseline and 12 weeks
The PedsQL 3.0 EoE measures symptoms and problems related to treatment, worry, communication, food/eating, and feelings. The range for PedsQL 3.0 EoE scores is 0 to 100, with a higher score indicating better quality of life. Scores were obtained at baseline and 12 weeks. Change in score is defined as the PedsQL 3.0 EoE total score at 12 weeks minus total score at baseline. 1FED vs 4FED changes are compared. An increase in score (positive change) is indicative of improved quality of life.
Baseline and 12 weeks
Change From Baseline in Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory Version 4.0 (PedsQL 4.0) Generic Core Scales at 12 Weeks
Time Frame: Baseline and 12 weeks
The PedsQL 4.0 measures physical and psychosocial function. The range for PedsQL 4.0 scores is 0 to 100, with a higher score indicating better quality of life. Scores were obtained at baseline and 12 weeks. Change in score is defined as the PedsQL 4.0 total score at 12 weeks minus total score at baseline. 1FED vs 4FED changes are compared. An increase in score (positive change) is indicative of improved quality of life.
Baseline and 12 weeks
Change From Baseline in Endoscopic Reference Score at 12 Weeks
Time Frame: Baseline and 12 weeks
The EoE Endoscopic Reference Score (EREFS) measures features of EoE including esophageal edema, rings, exudate, furrows, and strictures. The instrument grades edema and furrows as absent (0) or present (1); rings as absent (0), mild (1, subtle circumferential ridges), moderate (2, distinct rings) and severe (3, rings that impair passage of a standard adult diagnostic endoscope); exudates as absent (0), mild (1, less than 10% of the esophageal surface area) or severe (2, greater or equal to 10% of the esophageal surface area); and strictures as absent (0) or present (1) with an estimation of the minimal luminal diameter. Higher scores indicate more severe disease (range 0 - 9). Scores were obtained at baseline and 12 weeks. Change in score is defined as the EREFS total score at 12 weeks minus total score at baseline. 1FED vs 4FED changes are compared. A reduction in score (negative change) is indicative of a reduction in esophageal abnormalities.
Baseline and 12 weeks
Percent of Participants With Positive and Negative Milk Skin Prick Tests Responding to 1FED
Time Frame: Baseline and 12 weeks
Reactions to skin prick test (SPT) to milk is positive if the wheal size of the milk test is at least 3 mm larger than the wheal size of the negative control. Treatment response is defined as clinical histologic remission (<15 eos/hpf).
Baseline and 12 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Marc E Rothenberg, MD, PhD, Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 21, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 16, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

May 16, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 12, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 18, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

November 20, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 27, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 27, 2018

Last Verified

July 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Yes

IPD Plan Description

The raw anonymized data tables, data dictionaries, and study documentation will be provided to outside investigators upon request, with the proviso that it may not be linked with external datasets so as to minimize the risk of re-identification. When the resources and the associated research findings have been published, data will be made available for research purposes to qualified individuals within the scientific community. Consortium participants will retain rights to any subject inventions generated.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

After the associated research findings have been published, data will be made available for research purposes

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Data will be provided in a form suitable for a variety of databases. Data will be provided to qualified individuals within the scientific community, according to federal guidelines.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • Study Protocol
  • Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Eosinophilic Esophagitis

Clinical Trials on 1 Food Elimination Diet

3
Subscribe