Efficacy Analysis of Complete Laparoscopic Resection of Recurrent Hepatocellular Carcinoma

January 2, 2016 updated by: Zhongguo Zhou, Sun Yat-sen University
This study is aiming to evaluate the clinical efficacy of complete laparoscopic resection of recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The investigators conducted a prospective study of 64 patients who were diagnosed with recurrent HCC and underwent surgical resection at the Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center from June 2014 to November 2014; 31 patients were enrolled in the laparoscopic group and underwent complete laparoscopic resection of HCC, and 33 patients were enrolled in the control group and underwent open surgical resection. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, shortest distance between the tumor edge and normal liver tissue, postoperative pain scores, postoperative time until the patient could walk, postoperative time until the patient could pass gas, hospital stay, and inpatient costs were compared between the two groups. The patients were followed up for one year after surgery, and the relapse-free survival was compared between the two groups.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

25

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

patients who were diagnosed with recurrent HCC and underwent surgical resection at the Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center from June 2014 to November 2014

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. recurrent HCC after open surgery
  2. recurrent HCC located in any part of the left lateral lobe or the diaphragm side of the right lobe and near the surface of the liver, which resulted in an easier operation
  3. no significant surgical contraindications
  4. no major vessel or bile duct tumor invasion and metastasis
  5. grade A or B liver function or grade C liver function that recovered to grade A after liver-protective treatment;
  6. the patient and his/her family was willing to undergo laparoscopic resection.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. major vessel or bile duct tumor invasion
  2. recurrent HCC located in the right liver parenchyma and near secondary vessels and bile ducts, resulting in a difficult operation
  3. grade C liver function
  4. significant surgical contraindications
  5. the patient and his/her family declined laparoscopic hepatectomy.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
laparoscopic group
patients in the laparoscopic group underwent laparoscopic resection of recurrent HCC
The surgical instruments used for the laparoscopic group included conventional laparoscopic instruments (three 5 mm trocars, two 10 mm trocars, and two damage-free laparoscopic clamps), the STORZ high-resolution laparoscopic operating system (Germany), the GEN300 ultrasonic scalpel system (Johnson & Johnson, USA), a laparoscopic linear cutter stapler (Johnson & Johnson, USA), a laparoscopic ultrasound device, LigaSure, bipolar coagulation, titanium laparoscopic clips, and absorbable hemostatic gauze.
control group
patients in the control group underwent conventional open surgery

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Perioperative complications
Time Frame: within the first 30 days
The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, shortest distance between the tumor edge and normal liver tissue, postoperative pain scores, postoperative time until the patient could walk, postoperative time until the patient could pass gas, hospital stay, and inpatient costs were compared between the two groups.
within the first 30 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
relapse-free survival
Time Frame: 1 year after surgery
The patients were followed up for one year after surgery, and the relapse-free survival was compared between the two groups.
1 year after surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Li Xu, Sun Yat-sen University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

June 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 20, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 23, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

November 24, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

January 5, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 2, 2016

Last Verified

January 1, 2016

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Recurrent Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Clinical Trials on laparoscopic resection

3
Subscribe