Efficacy of an Active Geriatric Evaluation for Geriatric Syndromes to Prevent Functional Decline in Family Medicine (AGE3)

February 18, 2021 updated by: Nicolas Senn, University of Lausanne

Efficacy of a an Active Geriatric Evaluation (AGE Tool) for Geriatric Syndromes to Prevent Functional Decline in Elderly Patients in Family Medicine: a Pragmatic Cluster Randomized Trial

This study aims to test the efficacy of a comprehensive assessment and management tool (AGE: Active Geriatric Evaluation) for geriatric syndromes to prevent functional decline in elderly patients followed in family medicine. Family practitioners will be randomised either to the intervention, consisting of a yearly screening for eight geriatric syndromes accompanied by a management plan in case of positive screening, or to usual care. Level of functioning and quality of life of patients in both arms will be assessed over two years.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The ageing of the population is associated to a rapid increase of chronic conditions and more specifically geriatric syndromes for which the health care system is largely unprepared. Being in frontline of this huge arising burden, family practitioners (FP) will need adapted tools to identify and manage elderly patients with complex needs and prevent functional decline while improving quality of life. It is however well recognized that effective and efficient evidence-based interventions adapted to the primary care setting are lacking. The AGE program (Active Geriatric Evaluation) was launched in 2011 and aimed at developing a comprehensive assessment and management tool for FP's to better identify and manage geriatric syndromes. The AGE tool consists of a 20-minute clinical screening instrument (Brief Assessment Tool, BAT), which performances for identifying geriatric syndromes was already assessed in general practice along the AGE program, and a comprehensive approach that encompasses: complementary diagnostic evaluations and propositions of management & treatment for each syndrome. The efficacy and efficiency of the AGE tool for preventing functional decline was never assessed in real life settings of general practice.

The aim of the study is to determine whether a comprehensive tool combining a brief assessment tool (BAT) for the early diagnosis of geriatric syndromes with a structured diagnostic and management strategy impacts on the functional decline and quality of life of elderly patients.

Design: Two-arm open label cluster randomized trial in FP practices, randomization unit: FP

Participants and setting: FP's and their patients aged ≥ 75 years in the French part of Switzerland. In total: 40 FP's (2x20) and 400 patients (2 x 200)

Intervention: Active Geriatric Evaluation. Controls: Usual care provided by FP's. Duration of study: 3 years (2 years of follow-up). Expected outcomes:functional ability of patients in the intervention arm ,measured through the activities of daily living, will be conserved compared to patients in the usual care arm.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

429

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Vaud
      • Lausanne, Vaud, Switzerland, 1011
        • Department of Ambulatory Care and Community Medicine

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

75 years and older (Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Aged 75 years or more
  • Consider the enrolling physician as his/her reference FP
  • Able to understand French
  • Living at home (not in institutions)
  • Visited his/her FP at least twice during the past year
  • Giving signed informed consent (or, in the absence of discerning capacity, giving assent in the presence of a surrogate signing the consent form)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Having had a geriatric or specialized memory consultation in the past 3 months (including assessment during rehabilitation)
  • Planning to leave the study area or to change of FP in the next 2 years

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Active Geriatric Evaluation (AGE tool)
The Active Geriatric Evaluation is a comprehensive assessment and management tool consisting of a 20-minute clinical screening instrument (Brief Assessment Tool, BAT) to identify 8 geriatric syndromes, and complementary diagnostic evaluations and propositions of management & treatment for each syndrome.
Yearly administration of the brief assessment tool (BAT). Once the presence of one or more geriatric syndromes is suspected using the brief assessment tool, a management strategy is proposed. It is divided in two distinct steps: 1) perform additional tests to confirm or exclude the diagnosis and 2) to propose specific management attitudes. All proposed attitudes are based on literature review and geriatrician expertise. The FP remains free to follow the proposed attitudes.
Other Names:
  • Active geriatric evaluation
Active Comparator: Usual care
No specific intervention will be provided to the patients, except what family practitioners (FPs) usually do. In this regard, it is possible that some FPs might use structured interventions similar to the AGE tool. This will be neither encouraged nor discouraged. FPs in the "usual care" arm will be asked to perform one BAT after 2 years of follow-up, at the final patient visit.
No specific intervention will be provided to the patients, except what family practitioners (FPs) usually do. In this regard, it is possible that some FPs might use structured interventions similar to the AGE tool. This will be neither encouraged nor discouraged. FPs in the "usual care" arm will be asked to perform one BAT after 2 years of follow-up, at the final patient visit.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL)
Time Frame: 2 years
Proportion of patients losing at least 1 instrumental IADL (8 items developed to assess functional status)
2 years
Basic Activities of Daily Living (ADL)
Time Frame: 2 years
Proportion of patients losing at least 1 basic ADL (6 items developed to assess functional status)
2 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Incidence of hospital admissions
Time Frame: During 2 years
Number of hospital admissions per patient per year
During 2 years
Incidence of institutionalization
Time Frame: During 2 years
Number of institutionalization per patient per year
During 2 years
Incidence of emergency visits
Time Frame: During 2 years
Number of emergency visits per patient per year
During 2 years
Incidence of outpatient visits
Time Frame: During 2 years
Number of outpatient visits to GP per patient per year
During 2 years
Health related quality of life (WHOQOL-OLD) score
Time Frame: 2 years
questionnaire composed of 24 items. This broadly validated instrument is composed of six facets: 1) Sensory abilities, 2) Autonomy, 3) Past, present and future activities, 4) Social participation, 5) Death and dying and 6) Intimacy
2 years

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Adhesion to Active Geriatric Evaluation Tool
Time Frame: 2 years
Proportion of GPs completing the difference sections of the Active Geriatric Evaluation Tool
2 years
Total cost
Time Frame: 2 years
Comparison, by arm, of total cost, corresponding to the sum of costs billed by FPs, drug prescriptions, hospital and institutional admission costs
2 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Nicolas Senn, MD PhD, Department of community medicine and ambulatory care, University of Lausanne

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 31, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

January 31, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 24, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 27, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

December 1, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 21, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 18, 2021

Last Verified

February 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 32003B_159863/1

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Geriatric Syndrome

Clinical Trials on Active Geriatric Evaluation (AGE tool)

3
Subscribe