SkinPen Efficacy on Acne Scars on the Face and/or Back

June 30, 2021 updated by: Bellus Medical, LLC

A Single-Center Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Tolerability of SkinPen on Male and Female Subjects' Acne Scars on the Face and/or Back

This single-center, clinical trial will take place over a 90 day course followed by 1-month and 6-month post treatment visits to assess the efficacy and tolerability of the SkinPen device when used on both men and women on the face and/or back.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

At least 20 subjects of varying Fitzpatrick skin types will be admitted to the trial for treatment on their moderate to severe acne scars on the face and/or back. Implementation of needle depths ranging from 0.25 mm to 2.0 mm will depend on severity of scars and their location. Each subject will undergo 3 treatments in 30 day increments and will take pre-treatment images as well as 1-month and 6-months post treatment images. Assessment will be based on the Goodman and Baron's grading system, the Clinician's Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale, as well as a self-assessment.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

41

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Texas
      • Richardson, Texas, United States, 45081
        • Stephens & Associates

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 60 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Men and women 18 to 60 years of age.
  • Subjects in good health.
  • Approximately 5 to 10 atrophic acne scars of mixed types (boxcar and/or rolling scars with some icepick scars allowed) on face and/or back that are moderate to severe.
  • Desire correction of his/her acne scarring.
  • Subjects of child bearing potential must take a urine pregnancy test and must test negative.
  • Subjects willing to sign a photography release.
  • Willingness to cooperate and participate by following study requirements.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Allergies to facial or general skin care products
  • Presence of an active systemic or local skin disease.
  • Severe solar elastosis.
  • Sensitivity to topical lidocaine.
  • Recent history of significant trauma to the face (< 6 months).
  • Significant scarring other than acne scars in treated area(s).
  • Severe of cystic active and clinically significant acne on the area(s) to be treated.
  • History of systemic granulomatous diseases.
  • History of hypertrophic or keloid scars.
  • Current cancerous or pre-cancerous lesions in area(s) to be treated.
  • Had microdermabrasion or glycolic acid treatment to treatment area(s) within 1 month prior to study participation.
  • History of chronic drug or alcohol abuse.
  • Current smokers or have smoked in the last 5 years.
  • History of cosmetic treatments: Skin tightening within last year, injectable filler of any type within the last year, neurotoxins within the last 3 months, ablative resurfacing laser treatments, non-ablative, rejuvanative laser treatments in last 6 months, chemical peel, dermabrasion, non-ablative laser or fractional laser resurfacing of face and neck within the last 4 weeks.
  • History of certain prescription medications (accutane or other retinoids, topical retinoids, prescription strength skin lightening devices, anti-wrinkle, skin lightening devices, antiplatelet agents/Anticoagulants, and/or psychiatric drugs).
  • Nursing, pregnant, or planning to become pregnant during study.
  • Current or pre-existing dermatologic diseases on the face or body (psoriasis, rosacea, eczema, etc.)
  • History of immunosupression/immune deficiency disorders.
  • Current or history of uncontrolled disease such as asthma, diabetes, hyperthyroidism, etc.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: SkinPen II
Three treatments using SkinPen II aesthetic microneedling device to each patient, with each treatment spaced one month apart.
Treatment of acne scars on the face and/or back at needle depth settings ranging between 0.25 mm to 2.0 mm, depending on severity and location of scarring.
Active Comparator: SkinPen Precision
Three treatments using SkinPen Precision aesthetic microneedling device to each patient, with each treatment spaced one month apart.
Treatment of acne scars on the face and/or back at needle depth settings ranging between 0.25 mm to 2.0 mm, depending on severity and location of scarring.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Severity of Acne Scars
Time Frame: Baseline, 1 month post treatment, and 6 months post treatment
Goodman and Baron's Qualitative grading system. Possible scores range from 1 = mild to 4 = severe.
Baseline, 1 month post treatment, and 6 months post treatment
Clinician's Global Aesthetic Improvement Assessment (CGAIS)
Time Frame: 1 month post treatment, and 6 months post treatment

Clinician's Global Aesthetic Improvement Assessment:

minimal score is 1- Very much improved and, maximum score is 5 -Worse: The appearance is worse than the original condition

1 month post treatment, and 6 months post treatment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Photo Grading of Acne Scar Assessment
Time Frame: Day 1 (Baseline), Day 30, Day 60, 1-Month post treatment and 6 Month post treatment

Photo grading of acne scars assessment was done using the following scale [Karnik J. et al, JAAD 2014, 71 (1)]:

Grade- Term- Description

0 - Clear-- No depression is seen in the treatment area. Macular discoloration may be seen.

  1. - Very mild- - A single depression is easily noticeable with direct lighting (deep). Most or all of the depressions seen are only readily apparent with tangential lighting (shallow).
  2. - Mild-- A few to several, but less than half of all the depressions are easily noticeable with direct lighting(deep). Most of the depressions see are only readily apparent with tangential lighting (Shallow)

3- Moderate-- More than half of the depressions are apparent with direct lighting (deep)

4- Severe-- All or almost all the lesions can be seen with direct lighting (deep)

Day 1 (Baseline), Day 30, Day 60, 1-Month post treatment and 6 Month post treatment
Subject Self-Assessment Using SASIS
Time Frame: One Month Post Treatment, 6 Month Post Treatment

Subject self-assessment was completed in 2 steps for self-assessed scar improvement scale (SASIS) and subject global aesthetic improvement scale (SGAIS):

  1. Based on a live assessment (subjects were provided with a hand mirror for assessment) of the subject while referring to pre-treatment images.
  2. Based on a comparison of pre-treatment images to current post-treatment images. Rating of Acne Scars

    • 1-Exacerbation of acne scars 0 No change in the appearance of acne scars

      1. 1% - 25% improvement in the appearance of acne scars
      2. 25% - 50% improvement in the appearance of acne scars 3-50% - 75% improvement in the appearance of acne scars 4-75% - 99% improvement in the appearance of acne scars
One Month Post Treatment, 6 Month Post Treatment
Subject Self-Assessment Using Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (SGAIS)
Time Frame: 1-Month Post Treatment and 6- Month Post Treatment

The following rating scale was used for SGAIS:

Rating and Description

  1. - Very much improved: Optimal cosmetic result
  2. - Much improved: Marked improvement in appearance from the initial condition, but not completely optimal
  3. - Improved: Obvious improvement in appearance from initial condition
  4. -No change: The appearance is essentially the same as the original condition
  5. - Worse: The appearance is worse than the original condition
1-Month Post Treatment and 6- Month Post Treatment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Thomas J Stephens, Ph.D, Thomas J. Stephens & Associates, Inc.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

December 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

July 25, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 21, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 4, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

January 6, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 21, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 30, 2021

Last Verified

June 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Atrophic Acne Scar

Clinical Trials on Aesthetic Microneedling Treatment

3
Subscribe