Autologous Atrial Appendage Derived Cells in the Treatment of Heart Failure

March 3, 2020 updated by: Ari Harjula, Helsinki University Central Hospital

Epicardial Delivery of Autologous Atrial Appendage Micrografts During Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery - Safety and Feasibility Study

This study aims to evaluate the safety and clinical feasibility of epicardially delivered autologous atrial appendage micrografts in the treatment of heart failure. The micrografts consisting atrial-derived cells and their extracellular matrix, are placed on an infarction scar during CABG surgery.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

The atrial appendages are a tissue reservoir for cardiomyocyte stem and precursor cells. During coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery part of the right atrial appendage can be excised upon insertion of the right atrial cannula of the heart-lung machine. This study aims to address the surgical feasibility and patient safety of epicardially delivered atrial appendage micrografts during CABG surgery.

Autologous cardiac cells are harvested from right atrial appendage during CABG of six patients. Micrografts consisting atrial appendage-derived cells (AADCs) and their extracellular matrix (ECM) of the atrial appendage are mechanically processed. The cells are placed on a tissue-engineered sheet with fibrin gel and tissue clue and further delivered epicardially on top of a infarction scar. Parameters including echocardiography reflecting cardiac insufficiency are studied pre- and post-operatively as well as at three and six months of the follow-up. Cardiac functional magnetic resonance imaging is performed preoperatively and at six-months follow-up. 20 patients will be recruited to serve as a control group. They are scheduled for elective CABG and are treated according to the normal hospital protocol, without the ECM sheet.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

36

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Helsinki, Finland, 00029
        • Annu Nummi

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Informed consent obtained
  • Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) between ≤50% and ≥15%
  • New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class II-IV heart failure symptoms

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Heart failure due to left ventricular outflow tract obstruction
  • History of life-threatening and possibly repeating ventricular arrhythmias or resuscitation, or an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator
  • Stroke or other disabling condition within 3 months before screening
  • Severe valve disease or scheduled valve surgery
  • Renal dysfunction (GFR <84 ml/min/1.73m)
  • Other disease limiting life expectancy
  • Contraindications for coronary angiogram or MRI
  • Participation in some other clinical trial

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: AACD-Therapy group
6 patients are recruited to the AADC-therapy group. Autologous atrial appendage derived cells (AADCs) are harvested from the appendage tissue removed during the venal cannulation of bypass. The cells and their extracellular matrix are placed with tissue clue to Cormatrix-sheet and further on top of the myocardium in the area of infarction scar. The procedure is done simultaneously with CABG surgery. The patients will be carefully monitored after the operations and cardiac MRI and echocardiogram will be performed previously to surgery as well as during the follow ups.
Elective CABG surgery
Atrial appendage derived cells are placed on the site of a infarct scar with matrix sheet
Active Comparator: Control group
20 patients are recruited to form the control group. They are patients scheduled for elective CABG surgery and they meet the same inclusion and exclusion criteria as the therapy group. There patients are followed as the hospital protocol with out any additional imagination or blood tests.
Elective CABG surgery

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Safety; need for vasoactive medication
Time Frame: 6 months
For assessing haemodynamics during the operation and at the intensive care unit
6 months
Safety; cardiac index in l/min/m
Time Frame: 6 months
For assessing haemodynamics during the operation and at the intensive care unit
6 months
Safety; hemoglobin in g/l
Time Frame: 6 months
For assessing haemodynamics during the operation and at the intensive care unit
6 months
Safety; oxygen saturation in the pulmonary arterial blood (SvO2) in %
Time Frame: 6 months
For assessing haemodynamics during the operation and at the intensive care unit
6 months
Safety; serum potassium level in mmol/l
Time Frame: 6 months
For assessing haemodynamics during the operation and at the intensive care unit
6 months
Safety; blood glucose level in mmol/l
Time Frame: 6 months
For assessing haemodynamics during the operation and at the intensive care unit
6 months
Safety; Left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) in %
Time Frame: 6 months
For assessing cardiac function during and after the operation by echocardiogram
6 months
Safety; pericardial effusion in mm
Time Frame: 6 months
For assessing cardiac function after the operation by echocardiogram
6 months
Safety: telemetric monitoring of rhythm
Time Frame: 6 months
For assessing cardiac function after the operation
6 months
Feasibility: Success in completing the delivery of the cell sheet to the myocardium
Time Frame: 6 months
Measured in 0= success, 1= no success
6 months
Feasibility: Waiting time in minutes for the cell sheet
Time Frame: 6 months
Waiting time in minutes for the finished cell sheet to be placed on the myocardium after doing all the required anastomoses
6 months
Feasibility: Waiting time in minutes for the heart
Time Frame: 6 months
Waiting time in minutes for the the heart after doing all the anastomoses and before the cell sheet is finished
6 months
Feasibility: Closing the right atrial appendage
Time Frame: 6 months
Closing the right atrial appendage after removing the standardized tissue piece for preparing the cell sheet. According to the hospital protocol, appendage is closed with purse string suture. 0 = no additional suturing needed, 1 = additional suturing needed.
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Left ventricular wall thickness
Time Frame: 6 months
Measured by MRI
6 months
Change in the amount of myocardial scar tissue
Time Frame: 6 months
Measured by MRI
6 months
Change in left ventricular ejection fraction
Time Frame: 6 months
Measured by MRI
6 months
Plasma concentrations of N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) levels
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months
New York Heart Association class
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months
Days in hospital
Time Frame: 1 month
1 month
Changes in the quality of life.
Time Frame: 6 months
measured by questionnaire
6 months
Change in movement and diastolic function of left ventricular wall
Time Frame: 6 months
Measured by MRI
6 months
Local changes in systolic and diastolic function
Time Frame: 3 months
Measured by echocardiogram
3 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Ari Harjula, Prof, Heart and Lung Center, Helsinki University Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

February 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 28, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 31, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

February 3, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 5, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 3, 2020

Last Verified

March 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Heart Failure

Clinical Trials on CABG surgery

3
Subscribe