The Ward Study for SeptiCyte® Lab to Distinguish Between Infection-positive and Infection-negative SIRS

February 27, 2018 updated by: Immunexpress

To Assess the Performance of SeptiCyte® Lab to Diagnose Patients Identified as Suspected of Sepsis in General Medical and Surgical Wards With Infection-positive From Infection-negative SIRS

A non-interventional, prospective observational study to assess the performance of SeptiCyte® Lab to diagnose patients identified as suspected of sepsis in general medical and surgical wards with infection-positive from infection-negative SIRS

Study Overview

Status

Terminated

Conditions

Detailed Description

This study is evaluating a molecular diagnostic device developed to distinguish between sepsis and infection-negative SIRS among critically ill patients.

This study is a prospective, non-randomized, non-interventional, observational trial of patients with suspected sepsis in the medical and/or surgical wards. The study is being conducted on two preselected patient care units.

All patients identified by a local screening tool undergo physician review. If the suspicion of sepsis is found to be plausible, routine and conventional diagnostic procedures, including: routine bloods, blood culture and specialized tests are conducted.

Blood collection for SeptiCyte® Lab and SeptID® is drawn within 6 hours of a positive screen - both use peripheral blood as the clinical sample. The diagnostic performance of the two experimental assays will be compared to Retrospective Physician Diagnosis (RPD), and conventional microbiological culture. The results of SeptiCyte® Lab and SeptID® are not used in any clinical decision-making.

This data will be used to analyze the performance of SeptiCyte® Lab according to the endpoint measures.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

66

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Rhode Island
      • Providence, Rhode Island, United States, 02903
        • Rhode Island Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 89 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Adults aged 18 years or older, previously admitted to medical and/or surgical general hospital wards, who are suspected of sepsis as identified by an in-hospital early-warning screening tool.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. 18-89 years old on the day of enrollment.
  2. Currently admitted to study designated medical or surgical ward
  3. Have a clinical suspicion of sepsis as determined by two physicians after identification by hospital screening tool.
  4. Screened positive for sepsis, severe sepsis or septic shock using the RISE2 screening tool.
  5. Completed SBAR handover (Situation, Background, Assessment, Recommendation)
  6. SIRS present as defined by the presence of two or more of the following:

    • Temperature > 38°C or < 36°C
    • Heart Rate > 90 beat/min
    • Tachypnea > 20/min or PaCO2 < 32 mmHg
    • WBC count > 12 000/mm3 or < 4 000/mm3 or > 10% immature neutrophils (bands)

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Consent not provided
  2. Patients less than 18 years of age, or 90 years of age or older.
  3. Patients for which a blood sample could not be taken within 24 hours of a physician first determining a clinical suspicion of sepsis.
  4. Patients that are not located in the designated medical or surgical ward associated with the study.
  5. Patients listed for "Comfort Measures Only".
  6. Less than 2 SIRS criteria
  7. Commencement of narrow spectrum directed antibiotics prior to screening.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Other
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
SeptiCyte® Lab test result versus Retrospective Physician Diagnosis (RPD) result
Time Frame: 7 days
To validate the ability of the SeptiCyte® Lab test to correctly discriminate infection positive from infection negative SIRS in hospital ward patients with two or more SIRS criteria compared to the non-reference method of retrospective physician diagnosis (RPD).
7 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
SeptiCyte® Lab test result versus test results for other sepsis biomarkes, including leukocytosis, bandemia, & procalcitonin
Time Frame: 7 days
To compare SeptiCyte® Lab test scores with other clinical sepsis biomarkers to assess its ability to discriminate infection positive from infection negative SIRS.
7 days

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
SeptiCyte® Lab test result versus a generalized sepsis screening protocol for identifying potential cases of sepsis
Time Frame: 1 day
To compare true positive rates of sepsis diagnosis in patients identified only by the RISE2 screening protocol vs. RISE2 screening protocol plus SeptiCyte® Lab results on Day 1.
1 day
SeptID® test result versus microbiological reference methods for identifying pathogen(s)
Time Frame: 7 days
To assess the performance of the SeptID® test against microbiological reference methods for identifying the a pathogen via blood culture.
7 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Steven Opal, MD, Memorial Hospital of Rhode Island

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

June 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 2, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 4, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

March 10, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 1, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 27, 2018

Last Verified

February 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

  • IXP 04-01b

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

IPD Plan Description

There is no plan to make individual participant data available.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Sepsis

Clinical Trials on SeptiCyte Lab molecular diagnostic test (non-interventional)

3
Subscribe