- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT02721290
Comparison of the Sensitive Cutaneous Block Distribution Following Femoral Nerve Block Using Two Femoral Block Techniques
August 29, 2019 updated by: Issam TANOUBI, Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital
Comparison of the Sensitive Cutaneous Block Distribution Following Femoral Nerve Block Using an Ultrasound Plus Neurostimulator Technique Versus an Approach Based on the Localization of the Femoral Artery.
In this study, we will be comparing two approaches to the femoral block.
The first or classical approach and one that is the most popular in our institution is used by combining ultrasound guidance and neurostimulator to do the block.
The second is performed with the ultrasound alone aiming at the inferolateral aspect of the femoral artery with the needle and injecting.
The primary endpoint of the study is the sensitive cutaneous block distribution using both techniques.
Study Overview
Status
Unknown
Conditions
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Anticipated)
80
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Contact
- Name: Issam Tanoubi, MD
- Phone Number: 3808 1 844 634-3400
- Email: i.tanoubi@icloud.com
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Cédric Godbout-Simard, MD
- Phone Number: 3808 1 844 634-3400
- Email: cedric.godboutsimard@mail.mcgill.ca
Study Locations
-
-
Quebec
-
Montréal, Quebec, Canada, H1T 2M4
- Recruiting
- Hopital Maisonneuve-Rosemont
-
Contact:
- Cédric Godbout-Simard, MD
- Phone Number: 5147151723
- Email: cedric.godboutsimard@mail.mcgill.ca
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients scheduled for an elective surgery for which the anesthesiologist planned to do a single shot or continuous femoral nerve block.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Any contraindication to the femoral nerve block (coagulopathy, infection, pre-existing neuropathy, local anesthetic allergy and refusal of local anesthesia).
- Refusal to participate in the study
- Inability to understand or communicate the effect of local anesthesia secondary to the femoral nerve bloc.
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Active Comparator: Femoral nerve block using Ultrasound and neurostimulator
Femoral block using the standard technique of ultrasound for femoral nerve identification and neurostimulator set at between 0.3-0.5 mA with quads muscle response for needle placement confirmation before injecting 20cc of Ropivacaine 0.5%.
|
Ropivacaine 0.5% (20cc total) will be injected for the performance of the block in the two arms of the study.
|
Experimental: Femoral nerve block using femoral artery target
Femoral block using the alternate technique of aiming for the inferolateral aspect of the femoral artery and injecting 20cc of Ropivacaine 0.5%.
|
Ropivacaine 0.5% (20cc total) will be injected for the performance of the block in the two arms of the study.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Sensitive cutaneous block distribution area for the two techniques
Time Frame: 45 minutes
|
After performance of a femoral nerve block, ice will be applied on the skin to plot the anesthetized area at times 15, 30 and 45 mn.
The sensation will be compared on a scale from 0 (no sensation) to 2 (no anesthesia) with the contralateral leg.
An area in cm2 will be calculated for each of the patients and the two techniques will then be compared.
|
45 minutes
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Time of block completion
Time Frame: 45 minutes
|
Time recorded from the end of the cutaneous local anesthetic injection to the end of the 20cc injection of the 0.5% Ropivacaine (time of block completion)
|
45 minutes
|
Ease of ultrasound visualization of the femoral nerve
Time Frame: 45 minutes
|
This will be assessed by the anesthesiologist making the femoral nerve block from a scale of 1 (no visualization) to 10 (excellent visualization).
|
45 minutes
|
Ease of ultrasound visualization of the femoral artery
Time Frame: 45 minutes
|
This will be assessed by the anesthesiologist making the femoral nerve block from a scale of 1 (no visualization) to 10 (excellent visualization).
|
45 minutes
|
Numbers of needle redirection
Time Frame: 45 minutes
|
The number of time for each patients using either techniques that the needle will have been withdrawn.
|
45 minutes
|
Vascular puncture
Time Frame: 45 minutes
|
Presence or absence of blood return at anytime in the tubing while performing the block.
|
45 minutes
|
Paresthesia
Time Frame: 45 minutes
|
Presence or absence of the sensation of electrical shock felt by the patient in the territory of the femoral nerve at any point while performing the block
|
45 minutes
|
Patient Satisfaction
Time Frame: 45 minutes
|
Satisfaction expressed by the patient after the completion of the femoral nerve block using a scale from 1 to 4.
|
45 minutes
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start
January 1, 2016
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
December 1, 2020
Study Completion (Anticipated)
December 1, 2020
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
March 15, 2016
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
March 22, 2016
First Posted (Estimate)
March 29, 2016
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
August 30, 2019
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
August 29, 2019
Last Verified
August 1, 2019
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 20160112
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Regional Anesthesia
-
Samsun UniversityCompletedAnesthesia | Regional Anesthesia | Anesthesia ManagementTurkey
-
Cairo UniversityRecruiting
-
Peking University Third HospitalBeijing Municipal Health CommissionRecruitingAnesthesia, Local | Surgery | Regional AnesthesiaChina
-
Ospedale Edoardo BassiniNot yet recruitingRegional Anesthesia | Regional Anesthesia Block | Total Hip Replacement Surgery | Total Hip Arthroplasty \(THA\)
-
Adiyaman UniversityRecruiting
-
Michael Bishay Shehata KerolesNot yet recruiting
-
Menoufia UniversityCompleted
-
University Health Network, TorontoTerminated
-
University Health Network, TorontoCompleted
-
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire VaudoisNot yet recruitingRegional Anesthesia
Clinical Trials on Femoral nerve block using Ultrasound and neurostimulator
-
Alexandria UniversityCompleted
-
Chicago Anesthesia Pain SpecialistsCompletedKnee ArthroplastyUnited States
-
Canadian Forces Health Services Centre OttawaCompletedMeralgia Paresthetica
-
The University of Texas Health Science Center,...Terminated
-
Clinique Medipole GaronneCompletedPrimary Total Knee ArthroplastyFrance
-
St. Luke's-Roosevelt Hospital CenterCompletedFall Risk | Quadriceps Muscle Weakness | Adductor Muscle WeaknessUnited States
-
Stanford UniversityCompleted
-
McGill University Health Centre/Research Institute...UnknownTotal Knee Arthroplasty Secondary to OsteoarthritisCanada
-
University of PennsylvaniaCompletedOsteoarthritis | Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) | FallsUnited States
-
University of HaifaWestern Galilee Hospital-NahariyaCompletedPain, Postoperative | Post Operative Pain | Knee ArthropathyIsrael