Investigation of Hypermobility, Biomarkers, and Pain Generators in Chronic Pain Patients (Hypermoble)

November 9, 2020 updated by: Mark J Burish, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston
Observational study of axial spine pain and hyperflexibility. Patients will receive physical exam maneuvers (traditional straight leg raise, FABER, facet loading as well as Beighton's hypermobility score) and blood / urine / saliva collection. They will also be separated into pain groups based on their response to injections. A correlation between exam findings and procedure group will be measured.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This is an observational study of patients with neck and back pain followed by a pain management clinic. Patients with particular pain generators in the neck and back will be defined by a positive response to one of several targeted interventional pain procedures. Each patient may undergo a physical exam to determine whether they have hypermobile joints. The study will thus evaluate the rate of hypermobility for each pain generator. In addition blood, urine, or saliva samples may be taken for biomarkers for pain or rheumatologic factors.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

31

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Texas
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
        • University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients with low back pain who are determined to be candidates for a pain procedure

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Clinical diagnosis of axial back pain (neck, mid-back, lower back) or pain radiating to the extremity, with suspected diagnosis of a specific pain generator amenable to a pain procedure, including disorders of the nerves, joints, and muscles as listed immediately below.
  • Clinical decision to schedule patient for a pain procedure, including procedures targeting the following disorders:

    • Facet arthropathy: intra-articular facet joint injection, medial branch block, medial branch radiofrequency ablation
    • Sacroiliac joint dysfunction: sacroiliac joint injection, lateral branch block, lateral branch radiofrequency ablation
    • Myofascial pain syndrome: trigger point injection
    • Radiculopathy, spinal stenosis, or herniated nucleus pulposus: epidural steroid injection, selective nerve root block
    • Piriformis syndrome: piriformis injection
    • Greater trochanteric bursitis: greater trochanteric bursa injection
  • Able to provide HIPAA authorization to share prior medical records/imaging.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previous diagnosis of cancer.
  • Currently pregnant.
  • Previously enrolled for the same procedure or the same pain generator site. (For example, this would exclude a patient who had an intra-articular facet joint injection at the right L5/S1 if: 1) he had the same injection 3 months ago and was enrolled at that time, or 2) the patient was already enrolled for a medial branch block at the right L5 and sacral ala, as this targets the same facet joint.)
  • Inability or unwillingness of subject or legal guardian/representative to give informed consent (e.g., ward of the state)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Epidural
Positive response (>50% pain relief) to any epidural (e.g. interlaminar/paramedian, transforaminal, caudal)
The beighton score is a 9 point score of flexibility, used for patients with disorders of collagen.
Selective nerve root block
Positive response (>50% pain relief) to selective nerve root block
The beighton score is a 9 point score of flexibility, used for patients with disorders of collagen.
Facet injection
Positive response (>50% pain relief) to intra-articular facet injection
The beighton score is a 9 point score of flexibility, used for patients with disorders of collagen.
Medial branch block
Positive response (>50% pain relief) to median branch nerve block
The beighton score is a 9 point score of flexibility, used for patients with disorders of collagen.
Medial branch RFA
Positive response (>50% pain relief) to median branch nerve radiofrequency ablation
The beighton score is a 9 point score of flexibility, used for patients with disorders of collagen.
SIJ injection
Positive response (>50% pain relief) to sacroiliac joint injection
The beighton score is a 9 point score of flexibility, used for patients with disorders of collagen.
Lateral branch block
Positive response (>50% pain relief) to lateral branch nerve block for SIJ
The beighton score is a 9 point score of flexibility, used for patients with disorders of collagen.
Greater trochanter injection
Positive response (>50% pain relief) to greater trochanteric bursa injection
The beighton score is a 9 point score of flexibility, used for patients with disorders of collagen.
Piriformis injection
Positive response (>50% pain relief) to piriformis injection
The beighton score is a 9 point score of flexibility, used for patients with disorders of collagen.
Trigger point injection
Positive response (>50% pain relief) to trigger point injection
The beighton score is a 9 point score of flexibility, used for patients with disorders of collagen.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Beighton hypermobility score
Time Frame: Prior to injection (2 weeks prior to injection for each patient)
9 point standardized scale
Prior to injection (2 weeks prior to injection for each patient)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Mark Burish, MD PhD, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 24, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 3, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

May 4, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 12, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 9, 2020

Last Verified

November 1, 2020

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Low Back Pain, Mechanical

Clinical Trials on Beighton score for hypermobility

3
Subscribe