Bowel Preparation by Face-to-face Re-education on the Day of Colonoscopy for Outpatient: a RCT (FFRE)

April 7, 2017 updated by: Yanqing Li, Shandong University

Effecacy of Face-to-face Bowel Preparation for Afternoon Colonoscopy: a Randomised Clinical Trial

The study compares the efficacy of bowel preparation between the face-to-face re-education(FFRE group) and normal education (no-FFRE group) in patients.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Despite advances in bowel preparation methods,bowel preparation is inadequate in up to one-third of all colonoscopies in reported series.Inadequate bowel cleansing results in negative consequences for the examination, including incomplete visualisation of the colon, missed lesions, procedural difficulties, prolonged procedure time and reduced time interval until follow-up, and an estimated 12-22% increase in overall colonoscopy cost.

The adequacy of a bowel preparation is closely linked to patient compliance with both dietary and purge instructions.One study performed in Asia showed that non-compliance with bowel preparation instructions, lower education level, and a long wait for the colonoscopy appointment were independent risk factors for poor bowel preparation. Another study performed in China showed that telephone re-education(TRE) about the details of bowel preparation on the day before colonoscopy significantly improved the quality of bowel preparation and PDR. So,it is reasonable to hypothesise that efforts to improve education and maximise patient compliance during the preparatory period will enhance the efficacy of bowel preparation.

The study compares the efficacy of bowel preparation between the face-to-face re-education (FFRE group) and telephone re-education (TRE group) in patients.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

658

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Shandong
      • Jinan, Shandong, China, 250012
        • Department of Gastroenterology, Qilu Hospital, Shandong University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Outpatients aged 18-80 years undergoing colonoscopy who had provided written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • history of colorectal surgery
  • severe colonic stricture or obstructing tumour
  • dysphagia
  • compromised swallowing reflex or mental status
  • significant gastroparesis or gastric outlet obstruction or ileus
  • known or suspected bowel obstruction or perforation
  • severe chronic renal failure (creatinine clearance<30 ml/min)
  • severe congestive heart failure (New York Heart Association class III or IV)
  • uncontrolled hypertension (systolic blood pressure>170 mm Hg, diastolic blood pressure>100 mm Hg)
  • toxic colitis or megacolon
  • dehydration
  • disturbance of electrolytes
  • pregnancy or lactation
  • unable to give informed consent
  • haemodynamically unstable

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: telephone re-education(TRE)
Subjects who are randomized into this group receive regular instructions at the time of their appointment to discuss colonoscopy (a nurse provides education of 5 minutes and meanwhilet sent a bookle to the patient) and a TRE which was conducted by a investigator at 15:00-17:00 on the day before colonoscopy.
Subjects who are randomized into this group receive regular instructions at the time of their appointment to discuss colonoscopy (a nurse provides education of 5 minutes and meanwhilet sent a bookle to the patient) and a TRE which was conducted by one investigator at 15:00-17:00 on the day before colonoscopy.
Experimental: face-to-face re-education (FFRE)
Subjects who are randomized into this group receive regular instructions on the day of their appointment to discuss colonoscopy and also a FFRE which was conducted by a investigator on the same-day of procedure at hospital.
Subjects who are randomized into this group receive regular instructions on the day of their appointment to discuss colonoscopy and also a FFRE which was conducted by a investigator on the same-day of procedure at hospital.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Adequate bowel preparation quality at the time of colonoscopy defined by Boston Bowel Preparation Scale rating scores≥6 among 2 groups.
Time Frame: 5 months
This is an established rating scale to evaluate the quality of bowel prep. The ratings will be compared among the 2 groups.
5 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rate of compliance with instructions among 2 groups
Time Frame: 5 months
Compliance was scored on a 3-grade scale based on the intake of bowel solution: 0 = optimal (intake of 100% of the solution); 1 = good (intake of ≥75% of the solution); 2 = poor (intake of <75% of the solution).
5 months

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Willingness to repeat bowel preparation among 2 groups.
Time Frame: 5 months
The willingness to repeat the same bowel preparation,a patient's subjective evaluation of the bowel preparation was recorded by a questionnaire
5 months
Polyp detection rate among 2 groups.
Time Frame: 5 months
Polyp detection rate was defined as the proportion of patients with at least one polyp.
5 months
Withdrawal time among 2 groups.
Time Frame: 5 months
Withdrawal time from ileocecum, not including the time of treatment and biopsy for polyps.
5 months
Caecal intubation rate among 2 groups.
Time Frame: 5 months
Caecal intubation rate is defined the proportion of patients with caecal intubation.
5 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

May 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 7, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 11, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

May 13, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 10, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 7, 2017

Last Verified

April 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Bowel Preparation

Clinical Trials on telephone re-education(TRE)

3
Subscribe