Referred Pain Patterns Infraspinatus Muscle

October 27, 2016 updated by: Emilio-José Poveda-Pagán, Universidad Miguel Hernandez de Elche

Referred Pain Patterns in Trigger Point 2 of the Infraspinatus Muscle in Patients With Shoulder Pain

The first aim of the study will be to identify the most common ReP pattern and compare its coincidence with that described by Travell and Simons. Second, the study aim will be to verify whether there are any significant differences by sex and types of technique used in regard to the ReP pattern of TrP 2 of the infraspinatus muscle, an area described as more sensitive.Finally, the third aim of the study will be to determine whether deep dry needling will evoke the LTR and ReP more easily than manual palpation.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Patients will be recruited from a university's employee and student population by advertising at the university. Patients with shoulder complaints (described as pain felt in the shoulder or upper arm) will be randomly assigned to either an manual palpation or deep dry needling group. Participants will be randomly divided into 2 groups, a deep dry needling group and manual palpation group. Visual analogue scale (VAS), referred pain (ReP) pattern and features of referred pain of the infraspinatus muscle will be all assessed post-technique.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

96

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Aged between 18 and 65 years.
  • To remain seated or in front of data visualization screens (tablets, computers or smartphones) for at least 4 hours a day.
  • Shoulder complaints in the last six weeks.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with evidence of serious medical illness.
  • Cognitive impairment.
  • Psychosocial disorders.
  • Bilateral affectation of shoulder pain.
  • Pregnancy.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Manual palpation group
For the manual palpation group, the reference position will be a lateral position, lying on the non affected shoulder while the affected side will be explored. The arm and elbow are flexed 90° resting on a pillow and legs placed with 90° hip and knee flexion to stabilize the body, with the head resting on a pillow to maintain body alignment. The physiotherapist will be in front of the participant and carried out the examination with flat palpation using the thumb to identify soreness taut band tried to elicit local twitch response and referred pain in the infraspinatus area. First, three attempts will be made to elicit an local twitch response (LTR) using snapping palpation if a response will be obtained. After LRT, referred pain could also be evoked by palpation.
The manual palpation level will kept constant by applying enough digital pressure to cause the finger nail bed to blanch. When the nail will be turn pale, the amount of pressure will be measured at approximately 3 4kg/cm2 and will be maintained for 5-10 seconds to evoke referred pain. A manual palpation referred pain will be present if the pain radiated far enough for the patient to feel more than just a local pain.
Experimental: Deep dry needling group
For the deep dry needling group, the reference position will be a lateral position, lying on the non affected shoulder while the affected side will be explored. The arm and elbow are flexed 90° resting on a pillow and legs placed with 90° hip and knee flexion to stabilize the body, with the head resting on a pillow to maintain body alignment. The physiotherapist will be in front of the participant and carried out the examination with flat palpation using the thumb to identify soreness taut before making the needle insertion. Sterile stainless steel needles (length 40mm/caliber 0.32 with a cylindrical plastic guide) will be used.
Intramuscular needling will be carried out via deep dry needling into myofascial trigger point (MTrP) area without the introduction any substances. The aim is to elicit a local twitch response upon inserting the needle into the MTrP area and perform a neurological stimulation (by rotating the needle 360 degrees) to more easily evoke referred pain, holding for 10 seconds and then extracting the needle gently. The procedure will be followed by one minute of haemostatic compression.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mapping of Referred Pain Pattern
Time Frame: One month
The participants from both groups will ask to report whether ReP is evoked and to describe the ReP pattern using an anatomical map of the upper half of the human body divided into eighteen areas. Nine areas corresponded to the anterior part of the body and the other nine to the posterior part of the body.
One month

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Prevalence active trigger point
Time Frame: One month
Active trigger point is considered: Soreness taut band and familiar pain.
One month
Evocation of Local Twitch Response
Time Frame: One month
These were assigned a numerical value of 0 (yes) or 1 (no) for better statistical handling of the data.
One month
Subjective pain intensity: Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
Time Frame: One month
The VAS for pain measures the amount of pain experienced by a subject on a continuum from 0 to 10, with 0 being no pain and 10 maximum pain.
One month

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: José V Segura-Heras, PhD in math, UNIVERSIDAD MIGUEL HERNÁNDEZ DE ELCHE (ALICANTE)

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

July 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 21, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 26, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

June 29, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

October 28, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 27, 2016

Last Verified

October 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Shoulder Pain

Clinical Trials on Manual palpation

3
Subscribe