Educational Videos to Address Racial Disparities in Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Therapy (VIVID)

March 25, 2021 updated by: Duke University

Educational Videos to Address Racial Disparities in Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Therapy Via Innovative Designs

VIVID is a prospective, multicenter, randomized clinical trial in African American patients that will to evaluate: (1) the effect of an educational video on knowledge of sudden cardiac death (SCD) and implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs); (2) the effect of an educational video on the decision for ICD implantation, decisional conflict, and receipt of an ICD within 90 days; and 3) the effect of racial concordance between study patients and video participants (health care providers/patients) on the decision for ICD implantation, decisional conflict and ICD receipt within 90 days.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

VIVID is a prospective, multicenter, randomized clinical trial that will evaluate three specific research questions. In black patients eligible for a primary prevention implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD), 1) what is the effect of a patient-centered educational video compared with usual care (UC) on knowledge of SCD (Sudden Cardiac Death), associated risk factors, and ICDs; 2) what is the effect of a patient-centered educational video compared with UC on the decision for ICD implantation, decisional conflict, and receipt of an ICD within 90 days; 3) what is the effect of racial concordance between study patients and video participants (health care providers/patients) on the decision for ICD implantation, decisional conflict and ICD receipt within 90 days. In addition, in-depth qualitative interviews (IQI) with a sample of trial participants will be conducted to determine the salient influences on their decision and explore the reasons for their ultimate decision and subsequent implantation or non-implantation of an ICD.

Approximately 480 patients eligible for a primary prevention ICD will be enrolled at approximately 12 hospitals in this study. Study sites selected for VIVID will be geographically diverse and provide care to a significant proportion of racial and ethnic minority patients. Patient's will be mailed a letter regarding the study, prior to their initial visit. At the initial visit, patients will be approached about participation in the trial. For those interested, informed consent will be obtained and patients will be randomized. The investigators will be utilizing electronic consents on an iPad. Black patients will be randomized to one of 3 arms: educational videos presented in the same format; one with black participants (patients and providers) or the other with white participants (patients and providers); The third arm will be usual care (control) and the provider can interact with the patient consistent with their typical/usual care. Notably, for both intervention and control arms, all patient management decisions are completely at the discretion of the care providers.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

343

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • San Francisco, California, United States, 94143
        • University of California at San Francisco
    • District of Columbia
      • Washington, District of Columbia, United States, 20010
        • MedStar Washington Hospital Center
    • Georgia
      • Atlanta, Georgia, United States, 30322
        • Emory University School of Medicine
      • Macon, Georgia, United States, 31201
        • Georgia Arrhythmia Consultants and Research Institute
    • Maryland
      • Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21237
        • MedStar Health Research Institute
    • Michigan
      • Detroit, Michigan, United States, 48202
        • Henry Ford Hospital
    • Mississippi
      • Jackson, Mississippi, United States, 39216
        • Jackson Heart
    • New Jersey
      • Camden, New Jersey, United States, 08103
        • Cooper University Hospital
      • New Brunswick, New Jersey, United States, 08901
        • Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School
    • New York
      • Bronx, New York, United States, 10467
        • Montefiore Medical Center
    • North Carolina
      • Durham, North Carolina, United States, 27710
        • Duke University Medical Center
    • Pennsylvania
      • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19102
        • Drexel University College of Medicine
    • South Carolina
      • Columbia, South Carolina, United States, 29204
        • South Carolina Heart
    • Tennessee
      • Nashville, Tennessee, United States, 37232
        • Vanderbilt University Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

21 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Non-hospitalized patients with ejection fraction ≤35%
  2. New York Heart Association class I-III heart failure,
  3. Age >21
  4. Eligible for an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) for the primary prevention of sudden cardiac death
  5. Self-identified race as black
  6. Provision of informed consent to participate in the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Life expectancy <12 months
  2. Listed for Orthotropic Heart Transplantation (OHT)
  3. Transplant (OHT) or OHT imminent within 12 months,
  4. History of ventricular fibrillation or sustained ventricular tachycardia without reversible causes
  5. ICD already implanted
  6. Myocardial infarction within the last 40 days,
  7. Coronary revascularization within the last 3 months,
  8. Patients who are unable to understand the study procedures due to cognitive or language barriers.
  9. Inpatients will be excluded from the study because decision-making processes are thought to be appreciably different in inpatients as compared with outpatients.
  10. Plan for subcutaneous ICD (Sub-Q ICD)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Educational Video 1
African American/ Black Video
Experimental: Educational Video 2
Caucasian Video
Experimental: Usual Care (no video) 3
Standard Care/ No video

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proportion of Patients Saying "Yes" to ICD
Time Frame: 7 days
Proportion of patients who have decided by 7 days to receive an ICD among patients randomized to the video intervention compared with health care provider counseling (usual care)
7 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proportion of Individuals Saying Yes to ICD Implant in the Racially Concordant Video
Time Frame: 7 days
Proportion of patients who watched a racially concordant video and who decided by 7 days to receive an ICD
7 days
Changes in Patient Knowledge (Pre and Post Intervention)
Time Frame: Baseline preintervention and Baseline (approximately 20mins later) post intervention
Difference in Knowledge Questionnaire scores before and after receiving the intervention. Range of 0 to 13, with higher score indicating greater knowledge about ICDs.
Baseline preintervention and Baseline (approximately 20mins later) post intervention
Changes in Decisional Conflict (Pre and Post)
Time Frame: Baseline pre intervention and 1 week post intervention
Difference in Decisional Conflict Scale score from baseline pre-intervention to 1 week post-intervention, range of 0-100 with higher value indicating greater conflict about the decision to receive an ICD.
Baseline pre intervention and 1 week post intervention
ICD Receipt Within 90 Days of Enrollment.
Time Frame: 3 Months
Number of participants receiving ICD implant within 90 days of enrollment as assessed by medical record review.
3 Months
Time Spent With Patients by Providers in Each Arm of the Study
Time Frame: Baseline
Number of minutes spent with patients during baseline visit as measured by baseline questionnaire timer
Baseline
Patient Knowledge
Time Frame: 1 week
Assessment of knowledge retention at one week through re-administration of baseline Knowledge Questionnaire. Scale of 0-13, with higher score indicating more knowledge about ICDs.
1 week

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
In-depth Interview Focused on Barriers to ICD Placement Following the Initial Decision
Time Frame: 3 Month
In-depth phone interview
3 Month
In-depth Qualitative Interviews Focused on Impact of the Video on the Decision
Time Frame: 3 Month
In-depth phone interview
3 Month
In-depth Interview Focused on Barriers to ICD Placement Following the Initial Decision
Time Frame: 1 week
In-depth phone interview
1 week
In-depth Qualitative Interviews Focused on Influences on the Decision to Accept or Decline an ICD
Time Frame: 3 Month
In-depth phone interview
3 Month
In-depth Qualitative Interviews Focused on Impact of the Video on the Decision
Time Frame: 1 week
In-depth phone interview
1 week
In-depth Qualitative Interviews Focused on Knowledge of SCD and ICD
Time Frame: 3 Month
In-depth phone interview
3 Month
In-depth Qualitative Interviews Focused on Influences on the Decision to Accept or Decline an ICD
Time Frame: 1 week
In-depth phone interview
1 week
In-depth Qualitative Interviews Focused on Knowledge of SCD and ICD Therapy
Time Frame: 1 week
In-depth phone interview
1 week

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Kevin Thomas, MD, Duke University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

July 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 28, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

April 30, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 13, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 28, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

June 30, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 21, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 25, 2021

Last Verified

March 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Heart Failure

Clinical Trials on Educational Video1

3
Subscribe