- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT02820701
Ultrasound Evaluation of OMT for Sacral Base Asymmetry
January 8, 2019 updated by: A.T. Still University of Health Sciences
Ultrasound Evaluation of the Effect of Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment on Sacral Base Asymmetry
This prospective, randomized, controlled trial is proposed to investigate the effect of OMT on sacral base asymmetry as assessed by ultrasound.
Study Overview
Detailed Description
The proposed prospective, randomized, controlled trial will investigate the effect of osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT) on sacral base asymmetry as assessed by ultrasound.
The study will be conducted between July 2016 - June 2017 with data collection planned for August and September 2016.
Forty men and women ages 20 to 55 years with at least one or more episodes of LBP in the past two weeks will be recruited from the Kirksville area.
Participants will be randomly assigned into two groups, control or OMT using a random number generator.
Males and females will be randomized separately to ensure equal distribution into the two study groups.
Demographics including sex, age, and body mass index (BMI) will be collected on all participants.
All participants will complete a brief medical history questionnaire, receive an initial palpatory assessment of the sacral base asymmetry, and then an initial ultrasound evaluation of sacral base asymmetry.
After the ultrasound assessment, the control group will wait in another room for approximately 30 minutes.
Participants in the OMT group will receive OMT to address sacral base asymmetry after the initial ultrasound assessment.
Following the treatment period for the OMT group, all participants will receive a second ultrasound assessment of sacral base asymmetry.
The ultrasonographer will be blinded on whether the subject received an OMT or not.
After the second ultrasound measurement, the participants in the control group will be offered an OMT treatment consistent with that of the OMT group.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
60
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Missouri
-
Kirksville, Missouri, United States, 63501
- A.T. Still University
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
20 years to 55 years (ADULT)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
Must have experienced at least one or more episodes of LBP in the past two weeks Must be able to lie prone for 30 minutes Must be able to tolerate OMT -
Exclusion Criteria:
Prior spinal surgery Fractures Known congenital anomalies of the lumbar vertebra and sacrum Cannot lie prone for 30 minutes Cannot tolerate OMT
-
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
- Allocation: RANDOMIZED
- Interventional Model: PARALLEL
- Masking: SINGLE
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
NO_INTERVENTION: Control
All participants will receive an initial palpatory assessment of the sacral base asymmetry and then an initial ultrasound evaluation of sacral base asymmetry.
After the ultrasound assessment, the control group will wait in another room for approximately 30 minutes.
|
|
EXPERIMENTAL: Treatment
All participants will receive an initial palpatory assessment of the sacral base asymmetry and then an initial ultrasound evaluation of sacral base asymmetry.
Participants in the Treatment group will receive OMT to address sacral base asymmetry after the initial ultrasound assessment.
|
Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment to low back region
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Change in Sacral Base Asymmetry with OMT
Time Frame: Immediately pre and post treatment - approximately 30 minutes between measurements
|
Determine the extent to which OMT affects the relative asymmetry between the pelvic and sacral landmarks as measured by ultrasonography when compared to control group.
|
Immediately pre and post treatment - approximately 30 minutes between measurements
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Change in Sacral Base Asymmetry without OMT
Time Frame: 30 minutes between measurements
|
Determine if ultrasound measurements of sacral landmarks are stable over 30 minutes in untreated (control) participants.
|
30 minutes between measurements
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Agreement between palpatory and ultrasound measurements
Time Frame: Approximately 10 mins between palpatory and ultrasound measurements
|
Determine if ultrasound measurements of sacral base asymmetry agree with palpatory assessment.
|
Approximately 10 mins between palpatory and ultrasound measurements
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Karen T Snider, DO, FAAO, A.T. Still University
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
- Lockwood MD, Kondrashova T, Johnson JC. Feasibility of Using Ultrasonography to Establish Relationships Among Sacral Base Position, Sacral Sulcus Depth, Body Mass Index, and Sex. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2015 Nov;115(11):648-53. doi: 10.7556/jaoa.2015.135.
- Snider KT, Redman CL, Edwards CR, Bhatia S, Kondrashova T. Ultrasonographic Evaluation of the Effect of Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment on Sacral Base Asymmetry. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2018 Mar 1;118(3):159-169. doi: 10.7556/jaoa.2018.035.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (ACTUAL)
August 1, 2016
Primary Completion (ACTUAL)
August 1, 2016
Study Completion (ACTUAL)
August 1, 2016
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
June 29, 2016
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
June 29, 2016
First Posted (ESTIMATE)
July 1, 2016
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)
January 10, 2019
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
January 8, 2019
Last Verified
January 1, 2019
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- 160616-001
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
NO
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Manipulation, Osteopathic
-
Cardenal Herrera UniversityCompletedManipulation | OsteopathicSpain
-
AdventHealthTerminatedOsteopathic ManipulationUnited States
-
University of MinnesotaCompletedManipulation, OsteopathicUnited States
-
Istituto Superiore di Osteopatia di MilanoCompletedHealthy | Osteopathic ManipulationItaly
-
Accademia Italiana Medicina OsteopaticaCompleted
-
A.T. Still University of Health SciencesDO-Touch.NETEnrolling by invitationManipulation, OsteopathicUnited States
-
Edward Via Virginia College of Osteopathic MedicineCompletedPostural; Defect | Osteopathic Manipulation | Somatic; Functional DisturbanceUnited States
-
New York Institute of TechnologyCompletedOsteopathic Manual Manipulation of Neurovascular RegulationUnited States
-
Larkin Community HospitalMiami Beach Community Health CenterWithdrawnHypertension | Prehypertension | Osteopathic Manipulation | Sympathetic Nervous System
-
A.T. Still University of Health SciencesTerminatedLow Back Pain | Biomarkers | Osteopathic ManipulationUnited States
Clinical Trials on OMT
-
Lake Erie College of Osteopathic MedicineCompleted
-
University of North Texas Health Science CenterOsteopathic Heritage Foundations; American Osteopathic AssociationTerminatedType 2 Diabetes Mellitus | Chronic Low Back PainUnited States
-
MetiMedi PharmaceuticalsUnknown
-
Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine,...Not yet recruitingCoronary Artery Disease | Myocardial IschaemiaChina
-
New York Institute of TechnologyAmerican Osteopathic AssociationRecruitingType2 Diabetes Mellitus | Osteopathy in Diseases Classified ElsewhereUnited States
-
St. Luke's Hospital, PennsylvaniaEnrolling by invitationMigraine Disorders | Headache Disorders | Chronic Migraine | Headache, MigraineUnited States
-
New York Institute of TechnologyCompletedSegmental and Somatic Dysfunction of Other Regions (M99.09)United States
-
Abbott Medical DevicesCompletedCoronary Artery DiseaseNetherlands, United States, Canada, Serbia, Belgium, United Kingdom, France, Germany, Sweden, Czechia, Denmark, Hungary, Italy
-
University of Milano BicoccaItalian School of Osteopathy and Manual Therapies; Alpha Search MilanoWithdrawnTension-Type Headache
-
Seung-Jung ParkCardioVascular Research Foundation, KoreaWithdrawnAngina Pectoris, VariantKorea, Republic of