Visually Enhanced Education About Prostate Cancer

July 21, 2020 updated by: Austin Kirschner, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center

Visually Enhanced Education About Prostate Cancer (VEEP-C): A Randomized Controlled Trial

This randomized clinical trial studies how well visually enhanced education works in improving prostate cancer and treatment knowledge in patients with prostate cancer that has not spread to other places in the body. Visually enhanced education includes pictures, drawings, and photos, may help doctors better convey information about radiation and prostate cancer to patients.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:

I. Our goal is to conduct a randomized controlled trial to determine the impact of a visual presentation in the context of a radiation oncologist's discussion with patient during consultation on patient satisfaction at end of consultation visit and at end of treatment, on anxiety at start of treatment, on decision regret following treatment, and on perception of side effects following treatment. Of note, the attending radiation oncologist will be responsible for reviewing the Powerpoint presentation with the patient, taking time to answer any questions that the patient has

OUTLINE: Patients are randomized into 1 of 2 arms.

ARM A (STANDARD EDUCATION): Patients receive a standard prostate cancer radiation oncology consultation.

ARM B (VISUAL ENHANCED EDUCATION): Patients receive a visually enhanced prostate cancer educational Powerpoint presentation including prostate anatomy, pathologic results, surgical options, radiation therapy, and prognosis with pictographs during radiation oncology consultation.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

30

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Tennessee
      • Nashville, Tennessee, United States, 37203
        • Vanderbilt University Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Male

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient must have non-metastatic, biopsy proven prostate cancer
  • Must be referred to radiation oncology clinic

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Prior surgery or radiation therapy for prostate cancer
  • Patients who are blind are excluded

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Standard Education
Patients receive standard-of-care prostate cancer radiation oncology consultation.
Receive standard prostate cancer education presentation
Experimental: Visually Enhanced Education
Patients receive a visually enhanced prostate cancer educational Powerpoint presentation including prostate anatomy, pathologic results, surgical options, radiation therapy, and prognosis with pictographs during radiation oncology consultation.
Receive visually enhanced prostate cancer educational presentation

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Decision-Regret - based on Ottawa scale
Time Frame: Up to 12 weeks
Sample size was determined based on this primary outcome - with estimated mean of 16 in Arm A and mean of 8 in Arm B, with standard deviation of 15, with 80% power and alpha of 0.05.
Up to 12 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Satisfaction - SCA
Time Frame: baseline, end of treatment, and long-term follow-up
baseline, end of treatment, and long-term follow-up
Symptoms based on EPIC-26 short form
Time Frame: baseline, end of treatment, and long-term follow-up
baseline, end of treatment, and long-term follow-up
Anxiety - Memorial MAX-PC scale
Time Frame: 1 week
1 week

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Austin Kirschner, MD, Vanderbilt University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

September 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 25, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 25, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

July 27, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 23, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 21, 2020

Last Verified

July 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • VICC RAD 1646
  • NCI-2016-00777 (Registry Identifier: Clinical Trials Reporting Program)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stage I Prostate Cancer

Clinical Trials on Standard prostate cancer education presentation

3
Subscribe