A Pilot RCT on the Management of Term Prelabour Rupture of Membranes

November 14, 2016 updated by: Lucia Ramirez-Montesinos, University of Central Lancashire

"Active vs Expectant Management and Routine vs Only-when-necessary Vaginal Examinations During Labour for Prelabour Rupture of Membranes at Term, a Pilot RCT Study"

This is a pilot study that will eventually result in a main randomised controlled trial that will look at what management is associated with a higher rate of normal birth and a lower rate of chorioamnionitis (maternal infection) when women break their waters but labour does not start. Spontaneous rupture of the membranes (when the waters break) at term (37-42 weeks gestation) is a physiological event that happens during labour. However, according to Gunn et al. (1970) in 8-10 % of the cases the membranes rupture before labour starts. The time between the rupture and the onset of labour is called latent phase and time wise is variable.

Studies have showed no statistically significant differences in terms of neonatal infection or chorioamnionitis when the investigators induce labour with prostaglandins compared to when labour starts spontaneously (Hannah et al 1996). Seaward et al. (1997) noted a number of confounding factors that might relate to the incidence of chorioamnionitis (maternal infection), the strongest predictor was having more than 8 vaginal examinations since the rupture of membranes and before delivery which was a stronger predictor than the duration of the latent phase. It is thought that by reducing the number of internal examinations, chorioamnionitis may be reduced, and hence neonatal infection may also be reduced. The main RCT will compare clinical outcomes and maternal satisfaction when women consent to be randomized to four groups: (1) Active management and routine internal examinations during labour, (2) Active management and reduced internal examinations, (3) Expectant management and routine internal examinations, (4) Expectant management and reduced internal examinations.

This application seeks ethics approval for the pilot phase to ensure that a definitive study can be undertaken appropriately. It is important to test that all the components work well individually and as a whole, to estimate sample size and ultimately to test the integrity of the research protocol before embarking on the main trial.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

120

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 45 years (ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Prelabour rupture of membranes (confirmed)
  • Term pregnancy - from 37+0 till 41+2 weeks gestation (both inclusive)
  • Normal/Low risk pregnancy
  • Singleton, cephalic pregnancy
  • No known current infectious diseases
  • Aged 18-45 years old
  • Understands English and is able to read and write in English
  • Agree for their placentas to be sent to histology if clinical signs of infection
  • Not taking part in other clinical research at present
  • Consent to take part

Exclusion criteria:

  • Pregnancy of 36+6 or less or 41+3 or more weeks gestation
  • Breech or oblique presentation
  • Twin or multiple pregnancy
  • Previous caesarean section
  • Meconium stained liquor
  • Pre-eclampsia
  • Diabetes
  • Known to be colonised by Group B streptococcus
  • Current infections: HIV, Hepatitis B, Herpes
  • Doesn't give consent for the placenta to be sent to histology if clinical signs of infection
  • Not able to understand, read or write in English
  • Currently taking part in other clinical research

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: FACTORIAL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Expectant management and minimal vaginal examinations
Expectant management up to approximately 96hours and vaginal examinations only when necessary during active labour
EXPERIMENTAL: Expectant management and routine vaginal examinations
Expectant management up to approximately 96hours and routine vaginal examinations during active labour
EXPERIMENTAL: Active management and minimal vaginal examinations
Induction of labour at approximately 24hours and vaginal examinations only when necessary during active labour
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Active management and routine vaginal examinations
Induction of labour at approximately 24hours and routine vaginal examinations

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Percentage of eligible women who agree to take part in the study
Time Frame: 12 months during pilot stage
12 months during pilot stage

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of participants who stay in the allocation arm
Time Frame: 12 months during pilot stage
12 months during pilot stage
Percentage of participants who find the interventions acceptable
Time Frame: The questionnaire will be completed by the participants between 4-8 weeks after giving birth
Acceptability of the interventions to participants as measured by the study questionnaire
The questionnaire will be completed by the participants between 4-8 weeks after giving birth

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Lucia Ramirez-Montesinos, MSc BSc, University of Central Lancashire
  • Study Director: Soo Downe, PhD MSc BSc, University of Central Lancashire

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

November 1, 2016

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

October 1, 2017

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

November 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 14, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 15, 2016

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

August 19, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

November 16, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 14, 2016

Last Verified

November 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • STEMH-503
  • U1111-1185-3426 (OTHER: (Universal Trial Number)The World Health Organisation)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Prelabour Rupture of Membranes at Term

Clinical Trials on Expectant management

3
Subscribe