Anti-Inflammatory Agent in Sinusitis (E1416)

May 4, 2022 updated by: Anju Peters, Northwestern University

A Phase 2A, Single-Center, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind Study to Assess the Efficacy of an Anti-Inflammatory Agent in Patients With Sinusitis

To evaluate the efficacy of an anti-inflammatory agent compared with placebo in relieving signs and symptoms of disease in patients with sinusitis.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This is a Phase 2a, single-center, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study that includes 12 weeks of treatment with experimental drug anti-inflammatory agent or placebo TID administered orally.

All subjects will be ≥18 years, have sinusitis with persistent symptoms despite standard of care treatment, and have failed a course of steroids in the past.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

43

Phase

  • Phase 2

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

1. Females must have a negative urine pregnancy test at screening unless documented to have a hysterectomy or be postmenopausal.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Inability or unwillingness of a participant to give written informed consent or comply with study protocol
  2. Use of any investigational drugs within 30 days of screening.
  3. Acute infection needing antibiotic treatment at screening.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: AZ Compound
40 mg 12 weeks TID po
40 mg three times daily po for 12 weeks
collection of biomarkers for analysis of nasal disease
Other Names:
  • Biomarkers
QD Nasal Spray
Other Names:
  • Nasal Steroid (Nasonex, Flonase)
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
40 mg 12 weeks TID po
collection of biomarkers for analysis of nasal disease
Other Names:
  • Biomarkers
QD Nasal Spray
Other Names:
  • Nasal Steroid (Nasonex, Flonase)
looks like AZ compound, made by same company, double blind. 40 mg three times daily po for 12 weeks

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
TOTAL POLYP SCORE (TPS)
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 12

Measure Description:

Measurement of Primary outcome- 0-4 scale in each nostril, total is 8. The total polyp score is the sum of the right and left nasal polyp score. Maximum is 8, minimum is 0. Higher score indicates worse disease. 0 =No polyps 1=Small polyps in the middle meatus not reaching below the inferior border of the middle turbinate 2=Polyps reaching the lower border of the middle turbinate or polyp medial to the middle turbinate 3 = Large polyps reaching the lower border of the inferior turbinate 4 =Large polyps causing complete obstruction.

The primary outcome measured change in polyp size and secondary outcomes included change in radiographic severity of sinus disease, quality of life, and nasal symptoms as measured by Sino Nasal Outcome Test-22 (SNOT-22) and sense of smell by Brief Smell Identification Test (B-SIT) at 12 weeks in the AZD1981 group vs. the placebo. These were done at the baseline visit and the Week 12 visit.

Baseline and Week 12
Sinus CT Scan Scores by Lund-Mackay Scores
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 12
Measurement of secondary outcome: sinus CT scan scores by Lund-Mckay scores. We measured sinus radiographic severity with Lund-Mackay scores of 0 to 24. 0 was the least severe and 24 was the most severe. This secondary outcomes included change in radiographic severity of sinus disease, as measured by sinus CT scan scores at baseline and 12 weeks in the AZD1981 group vs. the placebo group.
Baseline and Week 12
BSIT (Brief Smell Identification Test)
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 12

Measurement of secondary outcome- BSIT (brief smell identification test) is a 12-item test measuring sense of smell. This is a multiple choice test with one correct answer out of four possible answer choices. This test features distinct types of smells. Minimum score: 0/12, which indicates that none of the correct answers were chosen on the 12-item test. Maximum score: 12/12, which indicates that all of the correct answers were chosen on the 12-item test. The higher the score, the better the outcome. Only one out of the four possible answer choices for each multiple choice question is correct. There are no subscales.

This secondary outcome measures sense of smell by Brief Smell Identification Test (B-SIT) at baseline (visit 1) and 12 weeks (visit 5) in the AZD1981 group vs. the placebo group.

Baseline and Week 12

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
SNOT-22 (Sino-Nasal Outcome Test-22) Score
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 12

Measurement of secondary outcome- the SNOT-22 test contains 22 items regarding patient-reported outcomes of sino-nasal symptom severity on a 0-5 scale for each item. 0 is no problem and 5 is problem as bad as it can be, so higher values represent a worse outcome than lower values. The subscale is 0 - 5 of each of the 22 items and the total score is the sum of the subscales of all 22 items. The minimum total score is 0/110. The maximum total score is 110/110.

This secondary outcome measured change in patient-reported outcomes of nasal symptoms as measured by Sino Nasal Outcome Test-22 (SNOT-22) over 12 weeks in the AZD1981 group vs. the placebo group.

Baseline and Week 12
Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 12
Measurement of secondary outcome- 0 to 10 scale bilaterally that measures how subjective sinus symptom severity, with 0 being the least troublesome to 10 being the most troublesome over 12 weeks in the AZD1981 group vs. the placebo group.
Baseline and Week 12

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Anju T Peters, MD, Northwestern University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 20, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 7, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

August 10, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 26, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 16, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

August 22, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 25, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 4, 2022

Last Verified

May 1, 2022

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Nasal Polyps

Clinical Trials on AZ compound

3
Subscribe