A Collaborative Palliative and Oncology Care Model for Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia

February 11, 2024 updated by: El-Jawahri, Areej,M.D., Massachusetts General Hospital

Randomized Trial of a Collaborative Palliative and Oncology Care Model for Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia

This research study is evaluating the impact a collaborative palliative care and oncology team will have on the quality of life, symptoms, mood, and end of life outcomes of patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Palliative care is a medical specialty focused on lessening (or "palliating") symptoms and assisting in coping with serious illness.

Study Overview

Status

Active, not recruiting

Detailed Description

The main purpose of this study is to compare two types of care - standard leukemia oncology care and standard leukemia oncology care with collaborative involvement of palliative care clinicians to see which is better for improving the experience of patients and families with AML undergoing treatment.

The investigators aim to find out whether introducing patients and families undergoing AML treatment to the palliative care team that specializes in symptom management can improve the physical and psychological symptoms that patients and families experience during their hospitalizations for their leukemia care as well as enhance the quality of patients' end of life care.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

160

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02114
        • Massachusetts General Hospital
    • North Carolina
      • Durham, North Carolina, United States, 27710
        • Duke University
    • Ohio
      • Columbus, Ohio, United States, 43210
        • Ohio State University
    • Pennsylvania
      • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 16802
        • University of Pennsylvania

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

60 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Hospitalized patients with high-risk AML, defined as:
  • Newly diagnosed patients with AML ≥ 60 years of age
  • Newly diagnosed AML with antecedent hematologic disorder
  • Newly diagnosed therapy-related AML
  • Relapsed AML
  • Primary refractory AML

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients already receiving palliative care
  • Major psychiatric illness or comorbid conditions prohibiting compliance with study procedures.
  • A diagnosis of acute promyelocytic leukemia (APML)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Standard Leukemia Care
Standard Leukemia care
Experimental: Collaborative Palliative and Oncology Care
Collaborative care from Palliative Care and Leukemia will be given

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Comparison of Patients' quality of life as measured by (FACT-Leukemia) Score at Week-2 Between Study Arms
Time Frame: 2 weeks
We will compare patients' FACT-Leukemia scores at week-2 adjusting for baseline scores. FACT-Leukemia ranges from 0-176 with higher scores indicating better quality of life.
2 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Compare patient quality of life longitudinally using FACT-Leukemia Scores longitudinally Between Study Arms.
Time Frame: up to 6 months
We will compare FACT-leukemia scores longitudinally between study arm. FACT-Leukemia ranges from 0-176 with higher scores indicating better quality of life.
up to 6 months
Compare psychological distress (as measured by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale) between Study Arms
Time Frame: up to 6 months
We will compare patients' psychological distress using the HADS between study arms at week-2 and longitudinally between study arms. The HADS consistent of two subscales assessing anxiety and depression symptoms with scores ranging from 0-21 with higher scores indicating worse psychological distress.
up to 6 months
Compare Symptom Burden (as per ESAS) Between Study Arms.
Time Frame: up to 6 months
We will compare patients' symptom burden using the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS) between the two arms at week-2 and longitudinally. The ESAS ranges from 0-100 with higher scores indicating worse symptom burden.
up to 6 months
Compare Patient-Reported PTSD (as per PTSD-Checklist) between study arms
Time Frame: up to 6 months
We will compare PTSD symptoms as measured by the PTSD-Checklist (PCL) between the two groups at week-2 and longitudinally. PCL scores range from 17-85 with higher scores indicating worse PTSD symptoms
up to 6 months
Compare Patient-Report Of Discussion EOL Care Preferences Between Study Arms
Time Frame: up to 6 months
We will compare patient-reported discussing their EOL care preferences between the two groups
up to 6 months
Compare Rates Of Chemotherapy Administration Within 30 Days Of Death Between The Two Study Arms
Time Frame: up to 6 months
to compare rates of chemotherapy administration near the end of life between the two arms
up to 6 months
Compare Rates Of Hospitalizations Within 7 Days Of Death Between The Study Arms
Time Frame: up to 6 months
to compare rates of hospitalizations within the last week of life between the study arms
up to 6 months
Compare Rates Of Hospice Utilization And Length-Of-Stay In Hospice At The EOL Between The Study Arms.
Time Frame: up to 6 months
to compare rates of hospice utilization and length-of-stay in hospice at the end of life between the two study arms
up to 6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Areej El-Jawahri, MD, Massachusetts General Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2019

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 24, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 28, 2016

First Posted (Estimated)

November 29, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 13, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 11, 2024

Last Verified

February 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 16-439

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Clinical Trials on Standard Leukemia Care

3
Subscribe