Improving Antimicrobial Prescribing Practices in the Neonatal ICU (iNAP)

March 8, 2017 updated by: Lisa Saiman, Columbia University

Improving Antimicrobial Prescribing Practices in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit

To determine if 3 randomly assigned bundles of stewardship interventions would reduce overall and inappropriate antimicrobial use in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), a pre-post study was performed in 4 NICUs.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Antimicrobial stewardship can improve the safety and quality of healthcare, reduce antimicrobial resistance, and reduce healthcare costs. However, the optimal strategies for the NICU population are unknown and few studies have evaluated the impact of stewardship in this population. To determine if 3 randomly assigned bundles of stewardship interventions would reduce overall and inappropriate antimicrobial use in the NICU. The investigators hypothesized that the bundle using all three interdisciplinary antimicrobial stewardship strategies (education, computer decision support and prescriber audit and feedback) would more effectively reduce overall and inappropriate antimicrobial use compared to usual care. A pre-post intervention study (one baseline year without interventions - May 1, 2009 - April 30, 2010, followed by two years of interventions - May 1, 2010 - April 30, 2012) was performed in 4 academically affiliated, level III NICUs. The sites were randomly assigned to usual care, one intervention, two interventions, or three interventions.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

6184

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Delaware
      • Wilmington, Delaware, United States, 19899
        • Christiana Care Health Sciences
    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10032
        • Columbia University Medical Center
      • New York, New York, United States, 10065
        • Weill Cornell University Medical Center
    • Pennsylvania
      • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19104
        • Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • infants admitted to study NICUs <7 days of age who remained hospitalized 4 days or more days

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Infants admitted to study NICUs 7 days of age and older who were hospitalized less than 4 days

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: NICU A - E+, CDS, and PAF
This site was assigned to three interventions, Education Plus (E+), Clinical Decision Support (CDS), and Prescriber Audit and Feedback (PAB).
Education Plus was an intervention developed by the study team based on the Center for Disease Control (CDC) 12 Step Campaign to Prevent Antimicrobial Resistance in Healthcare Settings. The study team provided Education Plus quarterly to prescribers at the three sites (NICU A, B, C) randomized to this intervention. Examples of topics presented were an overview of antimicrobial stewardship principles, epidemiology of healthcare-associated infections (HAIs), prevention of surgical site infections, antimicrobial susceptibility testing, and pharmacokinetic principles. Educational formats included didactic lectures, participation via the audience response system, case vignettes, and panel discussions.
The CDS tool was an intervention developed in consultation with neonatologists and pediatric infectious disease physicians from NICU A and B. Algorithms for empiric and targeted antimicrobial therapy for common pathogens and common clinical scenarios using local antimicrobial susceptibility patterns were developed. The CDS tool also provided additional components to facilitate antimicrobial prescribing, e.g., patient weight, day of life, previous culture results, antimicrobial orders, and selected laboratory results including white blood cell and platelet count, C-reactive protein, creatinine, and therapeutic drug levels. NICUs A and B also received E+
The prescriber audit and feedback (PAF) intervention was developed by the study team which held focus groups with neonatologists at NICU A (the site randomized to this intervention) to determine the feedback parameters and feedback format as previously described. Neonatologists at NICU A were provided aggregated prescribing data bimonthly that described inappropriate use as described below and prolonged therapy (>7 days) for culture-negative late onset sepsis. NICU A also received CDS and E+.
Other: NICU B - E+ and CDS
This site was assigned to two interventions, Education Plus (E+) and Clinical Decision Support (CDS).
Education Plus was an intervention developed by the study team based on the Center for Disease Control (CDC) 12 Step Campaign to Prevent Antimicrobial Resistance in Healthcare Settings. The study team provided Education Plus quarterly to prescribers at the three sites (NICU A, B, C) randomized to this intervention. Examples of topics presented were an overview of antimicrobial stewardship principles, epidemiology of healthcare-associated infections (HAIs), prevention of surgical site infections, antimicrobial susceptibility testing, and pharmacokinetic principles. Educational formats included didactic lectures, participation via the audience response system, case vignettes, and panel discussions.
The CDS tool was an intervention developed in consultation with neonatologists and pediatric infectious disease physicians from NICU A and B. Algorithms for empiric and targeted antimicrobial therapy for common pathogens and common clinical scenarios using local antimicrobial susceptibility patterns were developed. The CDS tool also provided additional components to facilitate antimicrobial prescribing, e.g., patient weight, day of life, previous culture results, antimicrobial orders, and selected laboratory results including white blood cell and platelet count, C-reactive protein, creatinine, and therapeutic drug levels. NICUs A and B also received E+
Other: NICU C - E+
This site was assigned to one intervention, Education Plus (E+).
Education Plus was an intervention developed by the study team based on the Center for Disease Control (CDC) 12 Step Campaign to Prevent Antimicrobial Resistance in Healthcare Settings. The study team provided Education Plus quarterly to prescribers at the three sites (NICU A, B, C) randomized to this intervention. Examples of topics presented were an overview of antimicrobial stewardship principles, epidemiology of healthcare-associated infections (HAIs), prevention of surgical site infections, antimicrobial susceptibility testing, and pharmacokinetic principles. Educational formats included didactic lectures, participation via the audience response system, case vignettes, and panel discussions.
No Intervention: NICU D - Usual Care
This site was not introduced to an interdisciplinary intervention.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Overall Antimicrobial Use measured as days of therapy per 100 patient-days
Time Frame: Through study completion for 2 years
The indications for initiation of intravenous antimicrobials were categorized as initiation of empiric therapy (antibiotics started prior to culture results), definitive therapy (culture results available prior to initiation of antibiotics), or prophylaxis (e.g., antibiotics for postoperative prophylaxis).
Through study completion for 2 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Length of therapy per 100 patient-days
Time Frame: Through study completion for 2 years
2 agents received on same day counted as one day
Through study completion for 2 years
Inappropriate Antimicrobial Use
Time Frame: Through study completion for 2 years
Determined on 4th calendar-day of treatment as redundant therapy and failure to target the pathogen
Through study completion for 2 years
Number of infants initiated on ineffective empiric therapy
Time Frame: Through study completion for 2 years
Initiation of ineffective empiric therapy for infants thought to be infected
Through study completion for 2 years
Proportion of infants treated for culture negative late onset sepsis
Time Frame: Through study completion for 2 years
The proportion of infants treated for culture negative late onset sepsis lasting more than 7 days
Through study completion for 2 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 1, 2009

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 30, 2012

Study Completion (Actual)

April 30, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 2, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 8, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

March 14, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 14, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 8, 2017

Last Verified

March 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • AAAC6366
  • 1R01NR010821-01 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
  • 1R21NR010823-01 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Infants in Neonatal Intensive Care Units

Clinical Trials on Education Plus (E+)

3
Subscribe