Comprehensive Follow-up of Low Income Families. A Cluster-randomized Study (CRCT-HOLF)

September 26, 2022 updated by: Ira Malmberg-Heimonen, Oslo Metropolitan University

A Cluster-randomised Study Evaluating the Effectiveness of a Skill-training Programme for Social Work Professionals for Improving the Follow-up of Low Income Families Within Norwegian Welfare Services

In a cluster-randomized design, the study evaluates the effectiveness of a skill- training program for social work professionals with the aim of improving the follow-up of low income families within Norwegian labor and welfare services. While the Norwegian Labor and Welfare Administration are responsible for developing and implementing the program, researchers at Oslo and Akershus University College are conducting an independent evaluation of its effectiveness. By close follow up and better coordination of existing services the model aims to improve the financial and housing situation of the family, labor market attachment among the parents and the social inclusion of children. The cluster-randomized field experiment will take place over a 40-month period, involving 29 labor and welfare offices, 58 family coordinators and, based on estimations, 650 families. The research is funded by the Norwegian Labor and Welfare Administration.

The project is financed by Labour and Welfare Administration and led by Ira Malmberg-Heimonen, Faculty of Social Sciences. Participants in the project are: Ira Malmberg-Heimonen (project leader), Anne Grete Tøge, Krisztina Gyüre, Knut Fossestøl, Marianne Rugkåsa, Berit Bergheim and Tone Liodden.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Comprehensive follow up of low-income families. A cluster-randomised study. Start 1.1 2016, Finnish 31.5 2019 Funding: Norwegian Labour and Welfare Administration

Collaboration:

Norwegian Labour and Welfare Administration

Labour and Welfare offices:

NAV Alna, NAV Asker, NAV Bergenhus, NAV Bjerke, NAV Bodø, NAV Bærum, NAV Elverum, NAV Fana, NAV Frogner, NAV Gamle Oslo, NAV Gjøvik, NAV Grunerløkka, NAV Halden, NAV Harstad, NAV Haugesund, NAV Horten, NAV Larvik, NAV Lerkendal, NAV Lillehammer, NAV Malda, NAV Moss, NAV Nordstrand, NAV Rana, NAV Ringsaker, NAV Sandefjord, NAV Sandnes, NAV Skedsmo, NAV St.Hanshaugen, NAV Værnes

International collaborators:

Professor Jukka Vuori, Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, Finland Professor Richard Price, University of Michigan, US Senior researcher Gayle Hamilton, MDRC New York, US Professor Bruce Thyer, Florida State University, US

The Norwegian Labour and Welfare Administration has developed a comprehensive model in order to improve the follow-up of low income families, and thereby decrease poverty and its consequences. By close follow up and better coordination of existing services the model aims to improve the financial and housing situation of the family, labour market attachment among the parents and the social inclusion of children.

Oslo and Akershus University College has been commissioned to evaluate the effects of the model between 2016 to 2019, with long-term follow-ups until 2021. The evaluation is conducted as a cluster-randomized controlled trial, where 29 labor and welfare offices have been randomly assigned to the experimental and control group. All 29 offices receive funding two family coordinators each in order to work with low-income families. While the experimental group offices implement the HOLF-model for the follow-up of low income families, the control group offices implement locally developed models.

Prior to randomization, a baseline questionnaire was collected from office leaders and family-coordinators, while baseline information on families is collected based on administrative data prior to randomization and questionnaire data after randomization, but prior taking part in family projects. Shorter-term effects will be measured + 12 months after baseline for families, and long-term effects will be measured based on administrative data fup to four years after baseline.

Researchers at Oslo and Akershus University College analyses the implementation processes and effects of the implementation through questionnaires, administrative data, observational data, qualitative interviews with leaders, family coordinators and families.

The project will contribute to increased knowledge about measures to improve the follow up of low income families. It will generate knowledge of whether the HOLF-model is more effective than locally developed follow-up models, knowledge important for the discussion of evidence-informed vs practice-based interventions.

The project is financed by Labor and Welfare Administration and led by Ira Malmberg-Heimonen, Faculty of Social Sciences.

Participants in the project are: Ira Malmberg-Heimonen (project leader), Anne Grete Tøge, Krisztina Gyüre, Knut Fossestøl, Marianne Rugkåsa, Berit Bergheim and Tone Liodden.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

884

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Asker, Norway
        • NAV Asker
      • Baerum, Norway
        • NAV Bærum
      • Bergen, Norway
        • NAV Bergenhus
      • Bergen, Norway
        • NAV Fana
      • Bodo, Norway
        • NAV Bodø
      • Elverum, Norway
        • NAV Elverum
      • Gjovik, Norway
        • NAV Gjøvik
      • Halden, Norway
        • NAV Halden
      • Harstad, Norway
        • NAV Harstad
      • Haugesund, Norway
        • NAV Haugesund
      • Horten, Norway
        • NAV Horten
      • Larvik, Norway
        • NAV Larvik
      • Lillehammer, Norway
        • NAV Lillehammer
      • Lillestrom, Norway
        • NAV Skjedsmo
      • Mo i Rana, Norway
        • NAV Rana
      • Moss, Norway
        • NAV Moss
      • Oslo, Norway
        • NAV Alna
      • Oslo, Norway
        • NAV Bjerke
      • Oslo, Norway
        • NAV Frogner
      • Oslo, Norway
        • NAV Gamle Oslo
      • Oslo, Norway
        • NAV Gruneløkka
      • Oslo, Norway
        • NAV Nordstrand
      • Oslo, Norway
        • NAV St. Hanshaugen
      • Ringsaker, Norway
        • NAV Ringsaker
      • Sandefjord, Norway
        • NAV Sandefjord
      • Sandnes, Norway
        • NAV Sandnes
      • Stavanger, Norway
        • NAV Madla
      • Trondheim, Norway
        • NAV Lerkendal
      • Vaernes, Norway
        • NAV Værnes

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Each of the 29 offices identified a target group of families prior to randomization based on the following characteristics:

  • reliance on social assistance as a main source of income at least for six of the latest 12 months, or
  • received social assistance in addition to other types of welfare support at least for six of the latest 12 months, and
  • have up to four children under the age of 16. Based on these criteria offices identified a total of 3201 families.

Exclusion Criteria:

Families were excluded from participation in the project if:

  • they participate in other comprehensive family projects
  • one or both parents/caregivers are under treatment because of heavy substance abuse and/or serious mental disorders
  • the child or the children are temporary placed in child welfare institutions or living with relatives or other caregivers.
  • the family is under investigation by child welfare authorities, due to suspected child neglect or that a placement to new caregivers is in process.

Based on these criteria 320 families were excluded.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Comprehensive follow-up program
15 offices have been randomized to experimental group. Experimental group offices implement the HOLF model developed by the Labor and Welfare Administration
The main follow-up areas within the HOLF-program is to improve employment, housing, financial situation of the children. Beside manuals, family coordinators participate in five seminars with home-based tasks in between. Alo a comprehensive supervision structure is implemented that follow the train the trainer model. Coordinators ought to work directly with th families, but also with other actors important to the family, such as child-welfare and school. Coordinators should use specific tools improving the quality of the meetings, such as forms for preparation of meetings, being goal-focused and empowering.
Active Comparator: Local family projects
14 offices have been randomized to control group. these implement local family projects. These are developed based on local practice needs
The control group offices will develop local family projects, depending on local needs. they will also recruit and follow-up families.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes in the employment situation from baseline to follow-ups
Time Frame: T2 (+12 months after baseline), T3 (+24 months) T4 (+36 months) -T5 (+48 months)
Percentage employed
T2 (+12 months after baseline), T3 (+24 months) T4 (+36 months) -T5 (+48 months)
Change in the housing situation between baseline and follow-up
Time Frame: T2 (+12 months after baseline)
Objective and subjective estimations of housing quality
T2 (+12 months after baseline)
Change in the financial situation between baseline and follow-ups
Time Frame: T2 (+12 months after baseline), T3 (+24 months) T4 (+36 months) T5 (+48 months)
Income per month at follow-ups
T2 (+12 months after baseline), T3 (+24 months) T4 (+36 months) T5 (+48 months)
Change in children's situation from baseline to follow-up
Time Frame: T2 (+12 months)
Participation in kindergarden and other free-time activities
T2 (+12 months)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in professional competence between baseline and follow-up
Time Frame: T2 (+18 months)
Family coordinators professional competence. A six-item scale
T2 (+18 months)
Change in the level of working alliance between baseline and follow-up
Time Frame: T2 (+18 months)
Working Alliance Inventory Scale (short version)
T2 (+18 months)

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes in leaders competence between baseline and follow-up
Time Frame: T2 (+18 months)
Scale measuring office leaders competence in the follow-up of low-income families.
T2 (+18 months)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 30, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

December 30, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 7, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 5, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

April 6, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 27, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 26, 2022

Last Verified

September 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 48510 (nsd)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

After embargo + 5 years after finishing study (2026)

Study Data/Documents

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Poverty

Clinical Trials on Comprehensive follow-up program for low-income families

3
Subscribe