Clinical Effects in Cervical Spinal Mobilization and Oscillation Mobilization in Neck Pain

October 28, 2018 updated by: Jaime Salom Moreno, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos

Clinical Effects in Cervical Spinal Mobilization Versus Resonant Oscillation Mobilization (POLD) in Neck Pain. A Randomized Clinical Trial.

The aim of this study is to compare the clinical effects of spinal mobilization versus vertebral resonant oscillation (POLD) in patients with bilateral mechanical neck pain on pain sensitivity and neck pain intensity.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The clinical practice guidelines for manual therapy management the neck pain including the spine mobilization.

The vertebral resonant oscillation using the POLD method is similar to spine mobilizations, but there are some differens; the oscillatory movement has a sinusoidal waveform, the frequency used between 1.2 and 2 Hz and the amplitude is similar to "neutral zone" to described by Panjabi 1992.

The spinal mobilizations has a posterior-anterior vertebral movement for spinous process, described by Maitland 2000.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

50

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Madrid, Spain, 282922
        • Universidad Rey Juan Carlos

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years to 58 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • neck pain symptoms of mechanical nature
  • age from 18 to 60 years
  • bilateral symptoms
  • symptoms for at least 3 month of duration

Exclusion Criteria:

  • whiplash injury
  • previous spine surgery
  • diagnosis of cervical radiculopathy or myelopathy
  • having undergone any physical therapy intervention in the previous 6 month
  • pregnancy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Spine Mobilizations
Patients receive spinal mobilizations in grades II to III of central posterior-anterior from cervical and thoracic spine as described Maitland in 2000.
Patients receive spinal mobilizations in grades II to III of central posterior-anterior from cervical and thoracic spine as described Maitland in 2000
Experimental: Vertebral Resonant Oscillation (POLD method)
The vertebral resonant oscillation using the POLD method is similar to spine mobilizations, but there are some differens; the oscillatory movement has a sinusoidal waveform, the frequency used between 1.2 and 2 Hz and the amplitude is similar to "neutral zone" to described by Panjabi 1992.
The vertebral resonant oscillation using the POLD method is similar to spine mobilizations, but there are some differens ; the oscillatory movement has a sinusoidal waveform, the frequency used between 1.2 and 2 Hz and the amplitude is similar to "neutral zone" to described by Panjabi 1992.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes in pain intensity before and after the intervention
Time Frame: Baseline, one week after the last session, 1 months and 3 months after the last session.
A 10-point Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS; 0: no pain, 10: maximum pain) will be used to assess the patients' current level of neck pain
Baseline, one week after the last session, 1 months and 3 months after the last session.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes in disability before and after the intervention
Time Frame: Baseline, one week after the last session, 1 months and 3 months after the last session.
Neck Pain Disability Index (NDI)
Baseline, one week after the last session, 1 months and 3 months after the last session.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 10, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

October 25, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 9, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 9, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

May 11, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 31, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 28, 2018

Last Verified

October 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • URJC201701

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Neck Pain

Clinical Trials on Spine Mobilizations

3
Subscribe