Effect of Deep Versus Moderate Neuromuscular Block During Sevoflurane Anesthesia on Intraoperative Surgical Conditions. (BLISS4)

April 21, 2021 updated by: Albert Dahan, Leiden University Medical Center

Effect of Deep Versus Moderate Neuromuscular Block During Sevoflurane Anesthesia on Intraoperative Surgical Conditions in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Renal Surgery

A deep neuromuscular block (NMB) is often associated with improved surgical conditions especially in laparoscopic surgery. We previously showed that deep NMB is superior to a moderate NMB under propofol anesthesia. However, this may not apply to sevoflurane anesthesia and sevoflurane by itself produces some degree of muscle relaxation. We therefore plan to investigate the effect of deep NMB on surgical conditions under sevoflurane anesthesia maintenance.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBAs) are routinely administered during general anaesthesia to facilitate endotracheal intubation and to optimize surgical conditions. Increasing data suggest superiority of a deep neuromuscular block (defined by a post-tetanic count of 1-2 twitches) in creating optimal working conditions for the surgical team. However, it is unknown whether other aspects of the anaesthetic technique, most notably the choice of anaesthetic (for example, total intravenous versus inhalational anaesthesia), influence the relationship between the depth of the neuromuscular block and surgical conditions, particularly in laparoscopic surgery. Volatile anaesthetics are known for their ability to potentiate neuromuscular blocking agents an effect that is less existent with propofol. We previously showed that surgical working conditions in laparoscopic surgery during propofol anaesthesia are highly reliant on the depth of the neuromuscular block. Whether such a relationship also exists for inhalational anaesthetics, is unknown. To investigate this, we conducted a prospective, randomized, double blind study in which patients scheduled for laparoscopic renal surgery were randomized to receive either a moderate or a deep neuromuscular block during sevoflurane anaesthesia. The primary outcome was the intraoperative surgical condition assessed by a surgeon using the validated Leiden-Surgical Rating Scale. We hypothesized that the use of an inhalational anaesthetic would obviate the need for a deep NMB due to its intrinsic muscle relaxant potentiating properties to produce optimal working conditions.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

98

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Leiden, Netherlands
        • Leiden University Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients diagnosed with renal or prostatic disease who are will undergo an elective laparoscopic renal surgical procedure or laparoscopic prostatectomy;
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class I-III
  • > 18 years of age;
  • Ability to give oral and written informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Known or suspected neuromuscular disorders impairing neuromuscular function;
  • Allergies to muscle relaxants, anesthetics or narcotics;
  • A (family) history of malignant hyperthermia;
  • Women who are or may be pregnant or are currently breast feeding;
  • Renal insufficiency, as defined by glomerular filtration rate < 30 ml/h creatinine.
  • Previous retroperitoneal surgery at the site of the current surgery.
  • Body mass index > 35 kg/m2

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: TRIPLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
NO_INTERVENTION: Moderate neuromuscular block
Subjects will receive moderate neuromuscular block, aimed at 1-2 twitches train of four
EXPERIMENTAL: Deep neuromuscular block
Subjects will receive deep neuromuscular block, aimed at 1-2 twitches post tetanic count
Deep neuromuscular block will be achieved with high dose rocuronium to achieve a depth of 1-2 twitches post tetanic count
Other Names:
  • high dose rocuronium

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Leiden Surgical Rating Scale
Time Frame: during surgery
During the on average 3 hour procedure, the surgical condition will be scored by the surgeon using a 5-point surgical rating scale at 15 minute intervals(1: poor ; 5: optimal) Mean and standard deviation of the average of all leiden surgical rating scale will be reported.
during surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Postoperative Measurements and Outcomes; Pain Scores
Time Frame: During post-anesthetic care unit stay (average stay 2 hours) at 15 minute intervals

Postoperative measurements and outcomes of during PACU stay, all scores are reported as means and standard deviation of the average over the follow up period

-mean pain scores (numeric rating scale; 0 no pain - 10 worst pain imaginable)

During post-anesthetic care unit stay (average stay 2 hours) at 15 minute intervals
Intraoperative Hemodynamic Conditions
Time Frame: Perioperative measurements at 15 minute interval (on average during 3 hours)
Perioperative average blood pressure will be reported, mean blood pressure ranging from 65 tot 110 millimeters mercury is considered normal
Perioperative measurements at 15 minute interval (on average during 3 hours)
Postoperative Measurements and Outcomes; Sedation Levels
Time Frame: During post-anesthetic care unit stay (average stay 2 hours) at 15 minute intervals

Postoperative measurements and outcomes of during PACU stay, all scores are reported as means and standard deviation of the average over the follow up period

-ramsay sedation levels (0 = normal alertness, eyes open, responds normal to command 1 = drowsy with open eyes, closed and opened on command 2 = drowsy with closed eyes, opened in response to light auditory stimulus 3 = eyes closed, opened in response to rubbing the shoulder or a loud auditory stimulus 4 = eyes closed and opened only briefly in response to touching the subject 5 = eyes closed, unarousable by touch, aroused by painful 6 = unarousable by pain)

During post-anesthetic care unit stay (average stay 2 hours) at 15 minute intervals
Postoperative Measurements and Outcomes; Saturation
Time Frame: During post-anesthetic care unit stay (average stay 2 hours) at 15 minute intervals

Postoperative measurements and outcomes of during PACU stay, all scores are reported as means and standard deviation of the average over the follow up period

-blood oxygen saturation in percent levels between 95-100 are considered normal

During post-anesthetic care unit stay (average stay 2 hours) at 15 minute intervals
Intraoperative Nociception Level
Time Frame: Perioperative measurements at 15 minute interval (on average during 3 hours)

The median and full range of the average nociception level index will be reported.

The nociception level index consist of Ta multiparameter nonlinear combination of heart rate, heart rate variability, amplitude of the finger photoplethysmogram, skin conductance level, fluctuations in skin conductance, and their time derivatives, derived from random forest regression. Random forest is an algorithmic modeling approach that enables combining multiple parameters of different origin and discovering their complex nonlinear interactions. Normal range is between 10-20; 0 indicates no nociceptive events (in example, pain stimuli), 100 indicates severe painful stimuli.

Perioperative measurements at 15 minute interval (on average during 3 hours)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

June 14, 2017

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

April 1, 2020

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

June 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 25, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 26, 2017

First Posted (ACTUAL)

May 31, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

May 13, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 21, 2021

Last Verified

April 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Surgical Conditions

Clinical Trials on Deep neuromuscular block

3
Subscribe