Evaluation of a New Organization for Collecting Pre-chemotherapy Session Information (ChimioPal)

Evaluation of a New Organization for Collecting Pre-chemotherapy Session Information: a Multicenter, Open, Randomized Trial

The primary objective of this study is to compare an experimental organization for chemotherapy session planning based on early, standardized, and prioritized means of data transmission via secure e-mail (laboratory results) and the use of a smart phone (for clinical toxicity data) compared to the regular organization, in terms of the rate of prescriptions of chemotherapy prepared at the latest the day before a session and then administered in full (over a 6-month observation period) among colorectal cancer patients in need of cancer treatment in an outpatient setting.

Study Overview

Status

Withdrawn

Detailed Description

Compare the two arms of the study in terms of:

A. each element contributing to the primary criterium;

B. the quality of chemotherapy related care;

C. logistics;

D. patient satisfaction with respect to support for chemotherapy care;

E. the feasibility and acceptability of the organization by patients will be assessed by the rate of optimal use of toxicity collection tools and patient satisfaction rates relative to the tool (experimental arm)

F. Comparison of the overall cost of care in both arms and estimated cost of the strategy

Study Type

Interventional

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Avignon Cedex 9, France, 84918
        • Institut Sainte Catherine
      • Montpellier Cedex 5, France, 34298
        • Institut de Cancérologie Montpellier
      • Nîmes, France, 30029
        • CHRU de Nîmes - Hôpital Universitaire Carémeau
      • Strasbourg, France, 67098
        • CHRU de Strasbourg - Hopital de Hautepierre
      • Toulouse, France, 31100
        • IUCT-Oncopole
      • Toulouse Cedex 9, France, 31059
        • CHRU de Toulouse - Hôpital de Rangueil

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • The patient was informed about the implementation of the study, its objectives, constraints and patient rights
  • The patient has given his/her informed and signed consent
  • The patient must be insured or beneficiary of a health insurance plan
  • The patient is available for 6 months of follow-up
  • The patient is treated via anti-cancer chemotherapy for colorectal cancer
  • The patient is starting a new adjuvant or metastatic chemotherapy protocol with a follow-up in a day-clinic setting
  • The patient has already used a smartphone, or desires to learn how, or is accompanied by a person who can help the patient use a smartphone
  • The anticipated chemotherapy treatment corresponds to one of the following protocols: cetuximab, FOLFIRI, FOLFIRI-aflibercept, FOLFIRI-bevacizumab, FOLFIRI-cetuximab, FOLFIRI-panitumumab, Folfirinox, Folfirinox-bevacizumab, Folfoxiri, Folfoxiri-bevacizumab, FOLFOX 4 simplified, FOLFOX 4 simplified - bevacizumab, FOLFOX 4 simplified - cetuximab, FOLFOX 4 simplified - panitumumab, Irinotecan-cetuximab, LV5FU2 simplified, panitumumab, XELOX.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • The patient is participating in another study, or has participated in another study within the past 3 months, that may influence the results or conclusions of the present trial
  • The patient is in an exclusion period determined by a previous study
  • The patient is under judicial protection, or is an adult under guardianship
  • The patient refuses to sign the consent
  • It is impossible to correctly inform the patient
  • The patient is pregnant, parturient, or breastfeeding
  • The planned chemotherapy regimen includes weekly treatment cycles
  • Patient who is incapable of using a smartphone either by himself/herself or via another helping person

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: ChimioPal
Systematic collection of clinical and laboratory toxicities.

Systematic collection of clinical and laboratory toxicities (TXs) during the 2-4 days preceding a chemotherapy (CT) session (48H before a session (D-2 towards the end of the afternoon) and a maximum of 96h before sessions occurring on Mondays (D-4 towards the end of the afternoon). Clinical TX data will be collected via ChimioPal (a self-questionnaire administered by smartphone) and laboratory TX data will be collected via Apicrpyt (secure messaging service) or a fax-to-email service. Data flow management by a nurse dedicated to this activity in each centre will be implemented. If the results of the assessment do not authorize CT, additional assessments may be prescribed. If the experimental data transmission does not occur, the usual pathways will be implemented.

Patient training on how to use a smart phone and the questionnaire will be performed by a nurse before the start of the first chemotherapy session, with reminders at the following sessions if required.

Active Comparator: Standard
The usual management and logistic pathways will be respected.
In the standard arm, the usual management and logistic pathways will be respected. Only extra data collection is required by this study.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The rate of prescriptions for chemotherapy in the outpatient clinic prepared at the latest the day before a session (except for predefined, limited stability products) and administered in full, per patient, during a follow-up period of 6 months
Time Frame: 6 months

This criterion is aggregated per patient but its components are collected for each prescription, according to the following coding:

  • Prescription prepared in advance and administered in full: 1
  • Prescription prepared in advance but not administered in full: 0
  • Prescription not prepared in advance : 0

For each patient, the sum of the results for each prescription will be the numerator. The denominator is the number of prescriptions during 6 months follow-up for each patient.

The limited stability products that will necessarily be prepared at the last minute are:

  • Aflibercept
  • Panitumumab
  • Raltitrexed
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The number of prescriptions prepared in advance and administered in full
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months
The number of prescriptions prepared in advance and not administered in full
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months
The number of prescriptions not prepared in advance
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months
Dose-intensity per patient over 6 months of follow-up
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months
The number of chemotherapy session postponements that were anticipated, and the patient was not required to come in to the clinic
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months
The number of chemotherapy session postponements that were not anticipated, and the patient was required to come in to the clinic
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months
The number of pharmaceutical interventions* accepted by the doctor / the number of prescriptions prepared for the totality of sessions
Time Frame: 6 months
*a pharmaceutical intervention = request for prescription verification following results/information
6 months
The number of chemotherapy sessions that really took place (c) during the 6 months of follow-up
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months
The average number of days between chemotherapy sessions
Time Frame: 6 months

The average number of days of inter-session lag:

∑(days between 2 sessions-expected days between 2 sessions)/(c-1)

6 months
The waiting time (on average) for the patient in the outpatient clinic before administration of the treatment
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months
the total period of time spent by the patient in the outpatient clinic
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months
The number of prescriptions that were prepared and administered
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months
The number of pouches that were prepared, not-administered, but recycled
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months
The number of pouches prepared, not administered and destroyed
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months
The average number of laboratory assessments required per chemotherapy session
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months
Patient satisfaction vis-à-vis their chemotherapy care (Visual Analog Scale from 0.0 to 10.0)
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months
Experimental arm per patient: The number Apicrypt transmissions / number of lab prescriptions
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months
Experimental arm per patient: the number questionnaires filled out / the number of requested questionnaires
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months
Experimental arm: Patient satisfaction vis-à-vis the ChimioPal tool (Visual Analog Scale from 0.0 to 10.0)
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months
Overall costs
Time Frame: 6 months
The cost of pouches, consultations, examinations and transport will be estimated in both arms. Staff time, optimized due to the new organization, will be quantified. The point of view of health insurance and the establishment will be considered. Any gains will be weighed against the cost of the experimental strategy.
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Mireille Favier, PharmD, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

April 1, 2018

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

November 1, 2019

Study Completion (Anticipated)

November 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 15, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 15, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

June 19, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 19, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 15, 2017

Last Verified

June 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Colorectal Neoplasms

3
Subscribe