Erector Spine Block for Back Surgery

November 13, 2018 updated by: Dr M. B. Breebaart, University Hospital, Antwerp

Erector Spine Block in Patients Undergoing Back Surgery, Observational Feasibility Trial of the Effect on Postoperative Pain-scores and Opioid Consumption

In spine surgery postoperative pain can often be severe and difficult to treat.With the use of ultrasound, the performance of plane blocks and other techniques like root blocks, facet infiltration have become possible without the use of either unreliable " pop-techniques" or the use of x-ray.The erector spinae block was recently described as a safe and simple and safe technique for neuropathic pain and acute post surgical pain, with effect on the dorsal rami of the spinal nerves and with promising results. In this observational pilot study we want to test the influence of these to blocks on the postoperative pain and opioid consumption after spine fusion.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

In 10-15 patients undergoing back surgery (laminectomy or back surgery with lumbar pedicle screw placement or revision back surgery), will be asked to give informed consent to receive a bilateral lumbar erector spinae block before surgery. In this population it will be clear after 10-15 patients if there is a beneficial effect since these patients normally require a substantial amount of postoperative opioids because of significant postoperative pain.

The blocks will be performed by experts in the field of ultrasound guided locoregional anaesthesia in a separate block room with ultrasound after placement of an iv line and application of standard monitoring (ECG, NIBP, saturation)

Description of block performance according to Chinn et al but at a lumbar level:

The patient will be placed in the lateral or sitting position. With a curve array probe or a high frequency linear probe, depending on the BMI of the patient, will be placed in a longitudinal position 2-3 cm lateral of the vertebral column. The transverse processes of the vertebrae at the (mid) level of surgery, the erector spinae muscle and the psoas muscle are identified. Depending on the depth a 5 or 8 cm 22 G ultrasound needle (pajunk) will be inserted in an in plane technique in a cephalad to caudad direction until bone contact with the top of the transverse process is reached. After slight retraction of the needle, 20 ml of ropivacaine 0,375% will be injected behind the erector spinae muscle. The same procedure will be repeated on the contralateral side.

Sensory loss of the posterior dermatomes and dermatomes of the anterior roots of the spinal nerves (lumbar plexus, upper leg) will be tested Motor function of the legs will be evaluated with a Bromage (0-3) score.

General anaesthesia will then be induced in a standardized way with propofol, sufentanyl and rocuronium. The maintenance of anaesthesia and the procedure will be performed according to protocol.

After surgery analgesia will be provided with nsaid when applicable and 1000 mg paracetamol IV 4 times daily combined with a PCA (patient controlled analgesia) pump depending on the site:

  • AZ klina protocol: PCA piritramide/dhbp pump: 0ml/h, 2 mg bolus, 20 minutes lockout
  • UZA protocol: Morphine/dhbp pump: 0ml/h 1 mg bolus, 8minutes lock out) and Pain scores (NRS, 0=no pain 10= worst pain ever), will be tested on the post anesthesia care unit every hour and according to hospital postoperative protocol at the ward during the fist 24 hours.

The amount and frequency of the opioid usage of the first 24 hours will be extracted out of the PCA pump. In patients without a block, opioid consumption is mostly expected between 25-40 mg morphine/24h (loading dose excluded) according to weight. We expect to see a substantial decrease (at least 50 %) in opioid consumption.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

15

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Antwerp
      • Brasschaat, Antwerp, Belgium
        • AZ KLINA
      • Edegem, Antwerp, Belgium, 2650
        • University Hospital Antwerp

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients planned for laminectomy or back surgery with lumbar pedicle screw placement or revision back surgery

Exclusion Criteria:

  • patient refusal, bleeding disorder, infection

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: erector spinae block
bilateral erector spine block with 20 ml 0,375% ropivacaine
bilateral injection of local anaesthetic between the erector spinae muscle and the transverse process
injection of 20 ml ropivacaine 0.375 % bilateral by erector spinae block
Other Names:
  • naropin
Surgery of lumbar spine
general anesthesia

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
24 hour opioid consumption
Time Frame: 24 hours from injection ( T0)
cumulative opioid consumption first 24 hours after block performance
24 hours from injection ( T0)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
sensory block
Time Frame: 30 minutes after block performance
loss of cold sensation of anterior and posterior roots of lumbar spinal nerve dermatomes
30 minutes after block performance
motor block
Time Frame: 30 minutes after block performance
motor function of legs by Bromage scale
30 minutes after block performance
pain scores
Time Frame: 24 postoperative at regular intervals
numeric rating scores postoperative pain ( 0-10)
24 postoperative at regular intervals

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: margaretha breebaart, PhD, University Hospital, Antwerp

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 25, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 30, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

October 30, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 5, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 10, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

July 11, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 14, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 13, 2018

Last Verified

November 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Regional Anaesthesia

Clinical Trials on erector spinae block

Subscribe