A Study of Improving Education of Community Chain of Survival

Improving Education of Community Chain of Survival Through Innovative Teaching, Implementing Teamwork Skills, and Survey on Attitude and Willingness: A Pilot Study

"High-quality cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR)" and "early defibrillation" are the most important parts of "the chain of survival", and they are highly associated with the survival rate and life quality of patients with cardiac arrest. It needs the witness to perform bystander CPR and use the automated external defibrillator (AED) if CPR and defibrillation are expected to be performed earlier. Nevertheless, few patients with cardiac arrest received bystander CPR in Taiwan. It might be caused by some reasons. First, traditional training programs were inefficient and ineffective in the retention of skills and thus students were not confident in their CPR skills after receiving training programs. Second, the current training module focused on personal skill training only and lacked teamwork skills training. It led to poor performance of the students in actual resuscitation scene, where on-scene resuscitators were usually more than one. Third, the current training contents did not improve the attitudes and willingness of performing bystander CPR and it caused people who had received training program did not resuscitate the patients finally. To improve the above-mentioned problem, a three-year research project will be implemented. The aims of the project are the following:

1. to explore the effect of different teaching contents and hand-on practice feedback methods on the students' performance of chest compressing, ventilating and using AED in the CPR and AED training courses.
2. to analyze the current situation of teamwork when CPR and AED were performed, to build up the collaborating module accordingly and evaluate the effect of the new module on the students' performance of chest compressing, ventilating and using AED after the module is introduced into the training course.
3. to understand the factors affecting the motivations and willingness of people to learn and practice CPR and AED by utilizing questionnaires, and then to evaluate the effect of the creative program, which was modified according to the results of the questionnaires, on the motivations and willingness of people to learn and practice CPR and AED.

The investigators expect to design a more efficient resuscitation skill training course by implementing the research project and further to improve the motivations and willingness of people to learn and practice CPR and AED in the future.

Study Overview

• Status: Unknown
• Conditions: Cardiac Arrest Circulatory
• Intervention / Treatment: Device: automatic computer-led feedback; Other: instructor-led feedback

• Study Type: Interventional
• Enrollment (Anticipated): 500
• Phase: Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

• Study Contact: Name: Chih-Wei Yang; Phone Number: 61426 886-23123456; Email: cwyang0413@gmail.com

Study Locations

• Taiwan
  • Taipei, Taiwan
    • Recruiting
    • NTUH
    • Contact: Chih-Wei Yang; Phone Number: 61426 886-23123456; Email: cwyang0413@gmail.com

Participation Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: 16 years and older (Child, Adult, Older Adult)
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No
• Genders Eligible for Study: All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

• healthy laypersons without CPR training within two years

Exclusion Criteria:

• non

Study Plan

How is the study designed?

Design Details

• Primary Purpose: Treatment
• Allocation: Randomized
• Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
• Masking: Single

Number of Arms

2

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm	Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: automatic computer-led feedback; automated feedback for CPR quality provided by computers	Device: automatic computer-led feedback; automated feedback software for CPR quality, including compression depth, rate, recoil, hands-off time, and ventilation volume
Active Comparator: instructor-led feedback; feedback for CPR quality provided by instructors	Other: instructor-led feedback; feedback for CPR quality by instructors

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
chest compression rate	differences of chest compression rates	immediately after the training course
chest compression depth	differences of chest compression depth	immediately after the training course
hands-off time of chest compression	differences of hands-off time of chest compression	immediately after the training course
score of checklist	differences of scores of checklists	immediately after the training course

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
score of satisfaction questionnaire	differences of scores of satisfaction questionnaire	immediately after the training course

Collaborators and Investigators

• Sponsor: National Taiwan University Hospital

Study record dates

Study Major Dates

• Study Start (Actual): August 1, 2016
• Primary Completion (Anticipated): July 31, 2019
• Study Completion (Anticipated): July 31, 2019

Study Registration Dates

• First Submitted: August 17, 2017
• First Submitted That Met QC Criteria: August 27, 2017
• First Posted (Actual): August 30, 2017

Study Record Updates

• Last Update Posted (Actual): August 30, 2017
• Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria: August 27, 2017
• Last Verified: August 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

• Additional Relevant MeSH Terms: Heart Diseases; Cardiovascular Diseases; Heart Arrest
• Other Study ID Numbers: 201606085RIND

Drug and device information, study documents

• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product: No
• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product: No