Effect of Anesthesia on Optic Nerve Sheath Diameter in Patients Undergoing Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy

October 25, 2017 updated by: Young-Kug Kim, Asan Medical Center

Effect of Inhalation Anesthesia With Sevoflurane and Total Intravenous Anesthesia With Propofol on Optic Nerve Sheath Diameter in Patients Undergoing Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the difference between the optic nerve sheath diameter measured during total intravenous anesthesia and the optic nerve sheath diameter measured during inhalation anesthesia in patients undergoing robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the difference between the optic nerve sheath diameter measured during total intravenous anesthesia with propofol and remifentanil and the optic nerve sheath diameter measured during inhalation anesthesia with sevoflurane and remifentanil in patients undergoing robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

36

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years to 79 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Male

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Patients who have undergone a robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy with a prostate cancer and who are 20 years of age or older and under 80 years of age and who agree to participate in this study.

Exclusion Criteria:

Patients with a history of cerebral hemorrhage or cerebral infarction, Patients < 20 years of age, Patients ≥ 80 years of age, Patients with unexpected hemodynamic instability during surgery, Failure to measure optic nerve sheath diameter.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Total intravenous anesthesia
Total intravenous anesthesia with propofol and remifentanil
Total intravenous anesthesia with propofol and remifentanil
Active Comparator: Inhalation anesthesia
Inhalation anesthesia with sevoflurane and remifentanil
Inhalation anesthesia with sevoflurane and remifentanil

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Difference in optic nerve sheath diameter
Time Frame: 60 minutes after pneumoperitoneum and steep Trendelenburg position
Difference between the optic nerve sheath diameter measured during total intravenous anesthesia and the optic nerve sheath diameter measured during inhalation anesthesia
60 minutes after pneumoperitoneum and steep Trendelenburg position

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Difference in optic nerve sheath diameter
Time Frame: 30 minutes after pneumoperitoneum and steep Trendelenburg position
Difference between the optic nerve sheath diameter measured during total intravenous anesthesia and the optic nerve sheath diameter measured during inhalation anesthesia
30 minutes after pneumoperitoneum and steep Trendelenburg position
Difference in optic nerve sheath diameter
Time Frame: 5 minutes after pneumoperitoneum and steep Trendelenburg position
Difference between the optic nerve sheath diameter measured during total intravenous anesthesia and the optic nerve sheath diameter measured during inhalation anesthesia
5 minutes after pneumoperitoneum and steep Trendelenburg position

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 4, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 26, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 31, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 31, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

September 5, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 26, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 25, 2017

Last Verified

October 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Prostate Cancer

Clinical Trials on Total intravenous anesthesia

3
Subscribe