Ketamine Effect on Isoflurane Anesthesia

November 25, 2017 updated by: Hassan, Mamdouh Hassan Mohamed, Minia University

Electroencephalographic Effects of Ketamine During Isoflurane Maintenance and Recovery

Ketamine effect on isoflurane anesthesia This study is designed to study the effect of ketamine on isoflurane anesthesia. As both drugs are hypnotic and are used to cause sleep during surgery and other painful procedures, it was long believed that the actions of two drugs add to each other. For example if a man received both drugs, this man will become awake from anesthesia much later than if this man was given either of them alone.

However recent studies showed that this is not the case and ketamine can cause fast recovery from hypnotic effects of isoflurane. This was confirmed in animals.

The aim of current study is to investigate if this effect applies for humans, using a state of art brain monitoring device in wide use nowadays called BIS or bispectral index. This device can also shed some light on how ketamine can cause, if any, fast recovery from isoflurane anesthesia. Simply, by studying electrical wave coming from brain to head skin.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

In an animal study, the authors found that intraperitoneal injection of a sub-anesthetic dose of ketamine amidst isoflurane anesthesia in rats induced early recovery. A finding the authors explained, to be due to increased NMDA mediated increase of acetyl choline secretion in the prefrontal area of rats' brains. This rise, in the authors opinion, antagonized the GABA mediated isoflurane anesthesia resulting in hastened recovery. Meanwhile, the authors found association between hastened recovery and increased Electroencephalographic gamma (EEG γ) wave fronto-parietal projection. This is compatible with cognitive unbinding explanation of unconsciousness during anesthesia.

In current proposed study, the investigator will examine tow hypothesis:

Recovery time:

If the recovery hastening effect of sub anesthetic ketamine on recovery from isoflurane anesthesia is also present in human patients. The assumption will be that ketamine either prolong or has no effect on recovery time from isoflurane anesthesia. The claim well be that ketamine will decrease the recovery time.

Put in statistical terms:

H0: recovery with ketamine ≥ recovery without ketamine. H1: recovery with ketamine ˂ recovery without ketamine. 2. EEG (γ) wave activity: As the investigator will record EEG activity during the procedure via Bispectral monitor, the investigator will analyze the records for presence of enhanced (γ) activity during recovery. the investigator aim is also to detect any significant difference in (γ) wave amplitude or other characteristics between isoflurane only and ketamine group.

The assumption will be that (γ) activity will either show no difference between the two groups or be lower than in ketamine group than isoflurane group during recovery. The claim will be increased (γ) activity with ketamine group during recovery.

Put in statistical terms:

H0: (γ) activity with ketamine ≤ isoflurane only. H1: (γ) activity with ketamine > isoflurane only. N.P: as the sampling frequency of EEG data exported from BIS Vista is 128Hz, the upper limit of the current study of (γ) activity will necessarily be 64Hz.

Sample size calculation:

the mean measured variable of the current study will be the recovery time. Recovery time will be defined as the time between stop of isoflurane inhalation until recovery of verbal response to name called every 30 seconds. A 30% reduction in recovery time in ketamine group as compared with isoflurane is considered to be statically significant enough to reject the null hypothesis of recovery time. According to one study , recovery time from isoflurane only anesthesia is around 12 minutes so the sample size calculation will be as following:

Equation:

n>((ᶻ "1- α ̸2" +ᶻ"1-β" )"2" σ"2" )/δ"2" Where n = sample size required for each group, ᶻ "1-α" = the value for the standard normal distribution for (1-α̸2) percentile, ᶻ "1-β" =the standard normal distribution for 100(1-β) percentile, δ"2" = the difference to detect, σ"2" = the variance in the underling 2 population.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

30

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Minya
      • Al Minyā, Minya, Egypt, 61511
        • Minia University Hospital (main hospital)-kornish elnil st.

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Consent: patient must be legally fit to consent. Informed consent will be get from each patient.
  • ASA status: I or II.
  • Fully conscious at time of induction of anesthesia.
  • No history of side effects related to any drugs used in the study.
  • Planned surgery can be performed under spinal anesthesia

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Incompetence: failure to give informed consent or refusal.
  • Neurological or psychiatric disorders
  • Addiction
  • Recent intake of drugs affecting central nervous system
  • ASA state more than II
  • Morbid obesity
  • Surgery cannot solely performed under spinal anesthesia
  • Contraindication to spinal anesthesia as coagulopathy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: isonly
This arm will receive spinal anesthesia. then this arm will receive saline during isoflurane anesthesia. this arm will serve as a control group.
a similar volume of normal saline 0.9% for intravenous injection instead of ketamine will be given to the control group. this because the attending anesthesiologist will be blinded to the study drugs and aim according to the study proposal.
Other Names:
  • normal saline, Atsuka
Active Comparator: isoket
this arm will receive spinal anesthesia. then will receive isoflurane inhalation. during isoflurane inhalation, this arm will receive single injection of ketamine. at end of anesthesia, effect of ketamine on recovery will be monitored.
ketamine hydrochloride 250microgram/ ml for iv injection after 30 minutes of stable isoflurane anesthesia
Other Names:
  • Calypsol

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
recovery time
Time Frame: Time Frame: 1 hour
recovery time in this study is defined as time between stop of isoflurane inhalation and recovery of consciousness . this will be assessed by calling the patient first name loudly until the patient verbally respond.time will be recorded in seconds.
Time Frame: 1 hour

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
gamma wave activity
Time Frame: Time Frame: 2 hour
EEG will recorded after test drug administration and during recovery. recorded data will be offline analysed for EEG wave activity. the results will be compared between the two study groups.
Time Frame: 2 hour
processed EEG parameters
Time Frame: Time Frame: 2 hour
this include but not limited to BIS value, spectral edge frequency 95. these value will be online received from BIS monitor.
Time Frame: 2 hour

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Mamdouh H Hassan, MD, Minia faculty of Medicine. Minia university. Egypt

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 30, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 15, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

November 25, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 8, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 19, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

September 25, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 28, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 25, 2017

Last Verified

November 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Post-anesthesia Recovery

Clinical Trials on saline

3
Subscribe