Biomarkers in Saliva and Stool

March 9, 2018 updated by: Danone Asia Pacific Holdings Pte, Ltd.

Understanding Innate and Adaptive Immunological Response in Stool and Saliva Samples in Healthy Donors

To collect saliva and stool samples using the salimetrics swab and self-stool collection kit, process and store samples in a standardized manner. Following this, perform immunological assays such as enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, multiplex bead assay and Immunocap to correlate the salivary and fecal levels of biomarkers in healthy donors. As this method is non-invasive, we believe that more people will be willing to donate samples.

Study Overview

Status

Terminated

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Many soluble factors found in blood can be detected in saliva and stool. Often levels of these factors are found to correlate between body fluids, though the exact relationship between systemic (blood) and local (saliva and stool) immunity is not well established yet. Saliva- and stool-associated factors are produced in the oral cavity and in the gut, which represent mucosal sites that potentially come in direct contact with pathogens. Thus, the levels of mucosal-associated soluble factors can better represent the local immune response at these sites.

It is becoming clear now that saliva and stool can be used to analyze inflammatory responses as well. In a recent study, 20 possible salivary biomarkers related to obesity were surveyed and the authors found four biomarkers that exhibit significant change with increasing body weight in a pediatric population. Salivary C-reactive protein (CRP), salivary insulin, leptin and adiponectin were found to be different in obese children compared to healthy normal weight children. This data suggests that saliva could be a useful blood surrogate for the study of metabolic complications of obesity in children, where repeated blood sampling can be both traumatic and difficult. The results of this study also provide insight into the early development of metabolic disease in children. (Goodson, Kantarci et al. 2014). In another study, cytokines-chemokines-growth factors (CCGFs) were measured using multiplex bead assays and compared between plasma, saliva and urine collected from 20 male and female healthy volunteers. By analyzing more than one sample types from the same subject would increase the possibility of identifying biomarker(s) for any inflammatory disease. In this study, gender-specific CCGFs were also observed and concentrations of some CCGFs varied between genders. This information is also valuable for biomarker discovery that by combining male and female subjects in a clinical trial would eliminate false discovery of biomarkers (Khan 2012).

The mucosal immune system can be also understood by analyzing stool samples. In a recent study, it is shown that a particular bacterial predominance, such as Bifidobacterium sp., may enhance thymic development and immune responses to both oral and parenteral vaccines early in infancy, whereas a deviation from this pattern, resulting in greater bacterial diversity, may cause systemic inflammation (neutrophilia) and lower vaccine responses. Thus, vaccine responsiveness may be improved by promoting intestinal Bifidobacteria sp. and minimizing dysbiosis early in infancy (Huda, Lewis et al. 2014). Of note, the hallmark of adequate mucosal immune responses is the production of secretory immunoglobulin A (SIgA), which can prevent infection and remove antigen crossing the mucosal barrier.SIgAis also imperative to establish mutualism between host and the intestinal microbiota (Maynard, Elson et al. 2012). Hence measurement of SIgA can help to assess the mucosal immunity.

Despite saliva and stool samples are increasingly studied in order to assess mucosal immune response and/or clinical outcomes, there is still a lack of established methodology to be routinely used in diagnostic laboratories and clinical trials. Therefore our aim is to collect saliva and stool samples using the salimetrics swab and self-stool collection kit from a cohort of 60 volunteers, process and store samples in a standardized manner. Following this, we intend to perform immunological assays such as enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, multiplex bead assay and Immunocap to correlate the salivary and fecal levels of biomarkers in healthy donors. As this method is non-invasive, we believe that more people will be willing to donate samples. It is also easy to self-collect and it is cost efficient.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

86

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Singapore, Singapore, 138671
        • Danone Nutricia Research

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

No older than 60 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Healthy Volunteers in Singapore between 0 and 60 years of age

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

• Healthy volunteers of age 0-60 years old

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Volunteers with any known infectious diseases, such as HIV and Hepatitis B
  • Volunteers with any acute or chronic illness, such as chronic inflammatory bowel disease (e.g. Crohn's disease or ulcerative colitis)
  • Volunteers with oral diseases/ulcers

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Cross-Sectional

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Establish methods to detect immune markers in non-invasive samples: Saliva and stool in healthy volunteers
Time Frame: 1 year after completion of recruitment
ELISA RSV specific Immunoglobulin in saliva
1 year after completion of recruitment
Establish methods to detect immune markers in non-invasive samples: Saliva and stool in healthy volunteers
Time Frame: 1 year after completion of recruitment
ELISA Rotavirus specific Immunoglobulin in stool
1 year after completion of recruitment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Difference in RSV-specific Immunoglobulins between age groups.
Time Frame: 1 year after completion of primary outcome
Correlation between age and RSV-specific Immunoglobulins in saliva
1 year after completion of primary outcome
Difference in RSV-specific Immunoglobulins between age groups.
Time Frame: 1 year after completion of primary outcome
Correlation between age and rotavirus-specific Immunoglobulins in stool
1 year after completion of primary outcome

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Establish methods to detect immune markers in non-invasive samples: Saliva and stool in healthy volunteers
Time Frame: 1 year after completion of primary outcome
ELISA RSV specific Immunoglobulin in stool
1 year after completion of primary outcome
Establish methods to detect immune markers in non-invasive samples: Saliva and stool in healthy volunteers
Time Frame: 1 year after completion of primary outcome
ELISA Rotavirus specific Immunoglobulin in saliva
1 year after completion of primary outcome

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Elena Sandalova, PhD, Nutricia Research

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 11, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 26, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 26, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

September 29, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 12, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 9, 2018

Last Verified

December 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

IPD Plan Description

IDP is not going to be shared.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Healthy

Clinical Trials on No internvetion

3
Subscribe