Improved Otologic Implants on Demand Intraoperatively With 3D CAD/CAM Autografts

September 22, 2020 updated by: Nitinetics LLC
Prospectively analyze the use of 3D subtraction CAD/CAM in the operating room environment. Study participants, requiring middle ear surgery and ossicular reconstruction, will be implanted with one of two middle ear implants. The rationale is to complete a pilot study of the technology with a small number of designs. Each implant will be commonly used, in the public domain, and recreated by the CAD/CAM software.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Conventional middle ear prosthetic prosthetics, including total ossicular replacement prostheses (TORPs) and partial ossicular replacement prostheses (PORPs) are expensive, require large inventories for otologic surgery services, and carry the risk of extrusion or rejection. Autologous bone and cartilage can be used for many of these applications, but it requires expensive operating room time for carving to the appropriate shape and size.

The above considerations led to the concept of subtractive 3D CAD/CAM (computer assisted design/computer assisted manufacture) to produce accurate bone and cartilage autografts on demand in the operating room. Such a technology is hypothesized to save money by reducing operating room time, and reducing the need for expensive inventories of various shapes, sizes, and types of prosthetic devices. Since autologous materials are hypothesized to be less likely to extrude or cause other problems such as infection, this could also reduce costs.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

10

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Florida
      • Jacksonville, Florida, United States, 32209
        • Recruiting
        • University of Florida-Jacksonville
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • at least 18 years of age with middle ear disease requiring surgical ossicular reconstruction

Exclusion Criteria:

  • congenital anomalies

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: DEVICE_FEASIBILITY
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: SINGLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Control
Subjects receive the control device.
Surgical ossicular reconstruction with the standard available middle ear prosthesis.
Experimental: Investigational device
Subject receives the 3D CAD/CAM autograft prosthesis implant.
Surgical ossicular reconstruction with the experimental autograft prosthesis created using 3D subtraction CAD/CAM.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Cost savings
Time Frame: perioperative
operative costs compared between treatment groups utilizing total operative time in minutes
perioperative

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of participants with treatment related adverse events as assessed by CTCAE v4.0
Time Frame: 6 months
infectious process involving the use of a medical device
6 months
ABG
Time Frame: preoperative; 6weeks, 3 months, and 6 months postoperatively.
mean air-bone gap assessed and compared between treatment groups for statistical significance
preoperative; 6weeks, 3 months, and 6 months postoperatively.
Number of participants that experience device rejection
Time Frame: 6 months
rejection of device/prosthesis
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Glenn Knox, M.D., J.D., Nitinetics LLC

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

March 31, 2021

Study Completion (Anticipated)

March 31, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 13, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 28, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

September 29, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 24, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 22, 2020

Last Verified

September 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 3D CAD/CAM

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Middle Ear Disease

Clinical Trials on Control device

3
Subscribe