The Role of GABA-mediated Inhibition in Multisensory Temporal Processing & Postural Control in Older Adults

In recent years evidence has accumulated on the association between age-related decline in multisensory temporal processing and postural control. This proposed project aims at examining GABA-mediated inhibition as the potential mechanism behind this link. Our overarching hypothesis is that changes in the excitatory-inhibitory balance with a reduction of GABAergic inhibition is a common mechanism underlying age-related multisensory and postural deficits potentially mediated by age-related reduction in network segregation. To test this hypothesis, we will assess the relationship between age-related multisensory/postural deficits and age-related reduction in GABA concentration in related brain areas and probe the role of GABA-mediated inhibition using cognitive training that specifically targets inhibitory functions. Our multimodal approach is innovative, and findings from this study has the potential to lead to the development of safe and effective rehabilitation protocols for older adults with impaired multisensory temporal integration and postural control.

Study Overview

• Status: Not yet recruiting
• Conditions: Healthy Aging
• Intervention / Treatment: Behavioral: Inhibitory control training; Behavioral: Knowledge-based training

Detailed Description

The investigators will examine the effects of cognitive training in the elderly on multisensory temporal processing and postural control. The investigators will include 25 young participants and use their performance to establish age-related differences and target performance for training in the elderly. 50 elderly participants will be randomly assigned to one of the two training groups and will be asked to undergo 20 days (~30 mins/day) of inhibitory control training or knowledge-based training. Multisensory temporal processing abilities, postural stability and gait performance, brain GABA concentration, and resting-state based network segregation will be assessed before and immediately after training. Follow-up assessments will be carried out 30 days after training to examine the persistence of training effects.

Stimulus presentation. Visual and auditory stimuli will be generated using MATLAB and the psychophysics toolbox. Visual and auditory stimuli will be delivered via Display++ system and an AudioFile stimulus processor, respectively (Cambridge Research Systems). The use of these two devices allows for precise control of stimulus timing.

Inhibitory control training. Participants will be trained with tasks that involve both response withholding and rule switching. For example, participants will be asked to sort polygons based on features (e.g., shape or color) and will be asked to either provide or withhold sorting responses when presented with different cues. Rule-switching is introduced when participants must inhibit the "rule" used in the previous trial set and change the focus of their attention to a new sorting and/or inhibitory rule.

Knowledge-based training. This condition serves as the control. Participants will be presented with questions from different categories such as vocabulary, science, or geography and asked to select the correct answer from 4 alternatives within a certain time limit.

In both training conditions, task difficulty will progressively increase over the course of training based on participants' abilities. Pre- and post-training assessment of multisensory temporal processing abilities, postural stability and gait performance, brain GABA concentration, and resting-state based network segregation will be conducted.

• Study Type: Interventional
• Enrollment (Estimated): 50
• Phase: Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

• Study Contact: Name: Fang Jiang, Ph.D; Phone Number: 775-682-8606; Email: fangj@unr.edu

Study Locations

• United States
  • Nevada
    • Reno, Nevada, United States, 89557
      • University of Nevada, Reno
      • Contact: Fang Jiang, Ph.D; Phone Number: 775-682-8606; Email: fangj@unr.edu

Participation Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: 20 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

• Age between 65 and 80 (elderly group) and between 20 and 35 (young group)

Exclusion Criteria:

• History of epilepsy, stroke, Parkinson's disease, Alzheimer's disease, attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder
• History of head injury with loss of consciousness, brain surgery, or psychiatric disorders
• Early dementia or cognitive impairment
• Serious vision problems (including best-corrected binocular visual acuity worse than 20/25)
• Uncorrected hearing problems (pure tone threshold > 40 dB for 1000-2000 Hz)

Study Plan

How is the study designed?

Design Details

• Primary Purpose: Basic Science
• Allocation: Randomized
• Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
• Masking: Single

Number of Arms

2

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm	Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Inhibitory control training; In the inhibitory control training condition, participants will be trained with tasks that involve both response withholding and rule switching. For example, participants will sort polygons based on features (e.g., shape or color) and will be asked to either provide or withhold sorting responses when presented with different cues. Rule-switching is introduced when participants must inhibit the "rule" used in the previous trial set and change the focus of their attention to a new sorting and/or inhibitory rule. Task difficulty will progressively increase over the course of training based on participants' abilities.	Behavioral: Inhibitory control training; Cognitive training is inhibitory task-related.
Sham Comparator: knowledge-based training; The knowledge-based training condition serves as the control, in which participants will be presented with questions from different categories such as vocabulary, science, or geography and asked to select the correct answer from 4 alternatives within a certain time limit. Task difficulty will progressively increase over the course of training based on participants' abilities.	Behavioral: Knowledge-based training; Training is not inhibitory task-related.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Multisensory temporal processing performance change	Change from pre-training performance	At the end of 20-day training
Multisensory temporal processing performance change maintenance	Change from pre-training performance	30 days after training
Postural control and gait performance change	Change from pre-training performance	At the end of 20-day training
Postural control and gait performance change maintenance	Change from pre-training performance	30 days after training
Brain GABA level change	Change from pre-training level	At the end of 20-day training
Brain GABA level change maintenance	Change from pre-training level	30 days after training
Resting-state network segregation change	Change from pre-training level	At the end of 20-day training
Resting-state network segregation change maintenance	Change from pre-training level	30 days after training

Collaborators and Investigators

• Sponsor: University of Nevada, Reno
• Investigators: Principal Investigator: Fang Jiang, Ph.D, University of Nevada, Reno

Study record dates

Study Major Dates

• Study Start (Estimated): December 1, 2024
• Primary Completion (Estimated): November 30, 2027
• Study Completion (Estimated): November 30, 2030

Study Registration Dates

• First Submitted: October 18, 2017
• First Submitted That Met QC Criteria: October 27, 2017
• First Posted (Actual): November 1, 2017

Study Record Updates

• Last Update Posted (Estimated): February 13, 2024
• Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria: February 9, 2024
• Last Verified: February 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

• Other Study ID Numbers: 1086690

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

• Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?: YES
• IPD Plan Description: Results from proposed experiments will be reported either as group findings that do not identify individual participants, or by labeling the data of each participant with a unique code that does not include the participant's name or initials. De-identified individual participant data will be shared upon request and for research purpose only starting 1 year after publication.
• IPD Sharing Time Frame: Starting 1 year after publication
• IPD Sharing Access Criteria: Data will be shared upon request and for research purpose only.
• IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type: STUDY_PROTOCOL; SAP; ANALYTIC_CODE

Drug and device information, study documents

• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product: No
• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product: No