Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion Guided by 3D Printing (LAA-PrintRegis)

March 9, 2020 updated by: University Hospital, Montpellier

National Longitudinal Registry for Mid-Term Clinical Outcome And Procedure Efficacy Evaluation In Using A Novel Preprocedural Planning Method For Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion Guided By 3D Printing

Left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) was approved by the ESC guidelines as a stroke prevention alternative to warfarin for patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation in patients at high risk of bleeding (IIbB).

Although the overall LAAC benefice, in term of prevention of stroke or embolisme and decresing the anticoagulant-related risk of bleeding is already demonstrated, however the procedure success and safety, critically depends on understanding LAA anatomy and adequate pre-procedure planning.

3D-printed patient-specific adaptive and flexible LA models have demonstrated in a previous study an improving in LAAO device sizing, a better pre-procedural planning of the optimal trans-septal puncture site, by incorporating all anatomical variations and an improuving patient outcomes by reducing procedure time and number of prostheses employed per patient.

This technique is now used in several surgical centers in France and large prospective evaluation of the practice is necessary.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The 3D printing has modified the LAAC practices with a preoperative time allowing an optimal preparation of the prosthesis. This technique is now used in several surgical centers and prospective evaluation of the practice is necessary.

The objective of our research is to demonstrate the reduction of the operating time and number of prosthesis used per procedure when prior LAAC simulation testing and sizing is made on a 3D printed model.

It is therefore a longitudinal research to monitor professional practices for the evaluation of a new preoperative approach.

Procedures guided by 3Dprinted models will be compared (intention to treat population) in term of procedural parameters (procedure time, success rate, number of prosthesis per procedure) and procedural complication with prior Watchman study: post-FDA Approval US experience and national registries data. A second analysis (per protocol population) will be performed to compare patients with an informative utilization guided by 3D printed to those of the post-FDA Approval US experience and national registries.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

400

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Nîmes, France, 30032
        • Hôpital Privé Les Franciscaines

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients in atrial fibrillation addressed for percutaneous left atrial appendage closure intervention

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • non valvular AF
  • adressed for LAAC procedure

Exclusion Criteria:

  • opposition from patients

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
operating time
Time Frame: During 1 day
mesure of operating time to Day 0 (J0)
During 1 day
number of protheses
Time Frame: During 1 day
decrease number of prothèses to Day 0 (J0)
During 1 day
Implantation success rate
Time Frame: During 1 day
increase implantation success rate at Day 0 (J0)
During 1 day

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
number of periprosthetic leak
Time Frame: During 1 day
decrease number of periprosthetic leak at Day 0 (J0)
During 1 day
anasthesia time
Time Frame: During 1 day
decrease of anasthesia time at Day 0 (J0)
During 1 day
time of scopy
Time Frame: During 1 day
decrease time of scopy at Day 0 (J0)
During 1 day
irradiation dose
Time Frame: 1 day
decrease of irradiation dose (mGy.cm2) at Day 0 (J0)
1 day
Days of Hospitalisation
Time Frame: During 1 day
discharge and decrease of hospitalisation days
During 1 day
number of recapture
Time Frame: During 1 day
decrease number of recapture at Day 0 (J0)
During 1 day
number of off-axis prostheses
Time Frame: During 1 day
decrease number of off-axis prosthèses at Day 0 (J0)
During 1 day
number of embolized prostheses
Time Frame: During 1 day
decrease number of embolized prosthèses at Day 0 (J0)
During 1 day
Effective complete occlusion of the auricle
Time Frame: 3 months
increase rate of Effective complete occlusion of the auricle
3 months
Effective complete occlusion of the auricle
Time Frame: 6 months
increase rate of Effective complete occlusion of the auricle
6 months
prosthesis trombosis
Time Frame: 12 months
rate of prosthesis trombosis
12 months
procedural complications
Time Frame: during procedure and within 30 days
analysis of complications (Stroke, transient ischaemic attack, peripheral embolism, Pericardial effusion and tamponade Bleeding, Life threatening, major and minor, Acces related complications, Renal or hepatic acute failure)
during procedure and within 30 days
complication
Time Frame: 6 and 12 months
analysis of complications (Stroke, transient ischaemic attack, peripheral embolism, Pericardial effusion and tamponade Bleeding, Life threatening, major and minor, Acces related complications, Renal or hepatic acute failure) at 6 and 12 months
6 and 12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

December 1, 2017

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

December 1, 2019

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

December 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 11, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 27, 2017

First Posted (ACTUAL)

November 6, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

March 10, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 9, 2020

Last Verified

March 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Atrial Fibrillation

Clinical Trials on 3D printing

3
Subscribe