- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03345030
The Role of DNA Damage of Granulosa Cell on Oocyte Quality and in Vitro Fertilization Outcome
November 21, 2017 updated by: Esra Nur tola, Suleyman Demirel University
Deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) damage of granulosa cells obtained during oocyte retrieval will be evaluated by comet assay in unexplained infertile patients undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment.
The oocytes will be graded by particular criteria.
Fertilization, embryo quality, transfer rate, implantation, clinical pregnancy, pregnancy outcomes (gestational age at delivery, route of delivery, and birthweight etc.) will be recorded as well as demographic data.
DNA damage of granulosa cells will be compared between unexplained infertile and control groups.
The effect of DNA damage of granulosa cells on fertilization, quality of oocyte and embryo, implantation, and clinical pregnancy will be also evaluated.
Study Overview
Status
Unknown
Conditions
Detailed Description
Granulosa cells surrounding the oocytes will be mechanically obtained during the oocyte pick-up procedure in women undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment due to unexplained infertility.
Deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) damage in these cells will be evaluated by comet assay.
The quality of oocytes retrieved during the oocyte pick-up procedure will be graded by particular criteria (zona pellucida thickness, granulation, vacuolization, etc).
Fertilization rates, embryo quality by grading, and transfer rates will also be assessed.
Implantation and clinical pregnancy rates, and pregnancy outcomes including gestational age at delivery, route of delivery, and birthweight will be recorded as well as demographic data such as age, body-mass index, smoking, alcohol use, employment, coexisting chronic disease, infertility duration, etiology of infertility, treatment protocol, and hormone levels on day 3. Implantation will be evaluated by determination of serum human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) at day 12 following an embryo transfer.
Clinical pregnancy will be diagnosed upon presence of gestational sac on ultrasound examination.
DNA damage of granulosa cells will be compared between unexplained infertile group and control group.
The effect of DNA damage of granulosa cells on fertilization, quality of oocyte and embryo, implantation, and clinical pregnancy will be also evaluated.
Study Type
Observational
Enrollment (Anticipated)
60
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Cunur
-
Isparta, Cunur, Turkey, 32200
- Recruiting
- Esra Nur Tola
-
Contact:
- ESRA NUR TOLA
- Phone Number: +90 5327921084
- Email: perinatalog@hotmail.com
-
Isparta, Cunur, Turkey, 32200
- Recruiting
- Suleyman Demirel University, Faculty of Medicine
-
Contact:
- ESRA NUR TOLA
- Phone Number: 5329721084
- Email: perinatalog@hotmail.com
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
19 years to 44 years (Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes
Genders Eligible for Study
Female
Sampling Method
Non-Probability Sample
Study Population
Unexplained infertile (UI) group UI was diagnosed after normal standard infertility evaluation according to the guideline of The Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine which consist of the assesment of spermiogram, ovulation, hysterosalpingogram and if indicated ovarian reserve tests and laparoscopy.
If the results of all this tests were normal, patients were accepted as UI.
Control group The control group received IVF for male infertility (except azoospermia and severe oligoasthenospermia) or tubal factor included only those women who had salpingectomy for ectopic pregnancy.
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Unexplained infertile patients undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment
Exclusion Criteria:
- Chronic systemic disease (rheumatoid arthritis, hypertension, diabetes..)
- Endocrinopathy (Thyroid, prolactin... abnormalities)
- Chemotherapy or radiotherapy history
- Cigarette, alcohol, chronic medication use
- Diminished ovarian reserve
- Endometriosis
- Having any medication use
- History of any surgical procedure on ovaries and uterus
- Smoking or alcohol consumption
- Severe oligoasthenospermia
- Tubal infertility associated with hydrosalpinx, severe pelvic adhesions, endometriosis or pelvic inflammatory disease
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / Cohort |
---|
Unexplained infertile group
Patients diagnosed as unexplained infertility (UI) were recruited to the study.
UI was diagnosed after normal standard infertility evaluation according to the guideline of The Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine which consist of the assesment of spermiogram, ovulation, hysterosalpingogram and if indicated ovarian reserve tests and laparoscopy.
If the results of all this tests were normal, patients were accepted as UI.
|
Control group
The control group received in vitro fertilization (IVF) for tubal factor and included only those women who had salpingectomy for ectopic pregnancy or proximal tubal obstruction because of low-grade infection or fimbrial occlusion with or without mild peritubal adhesions.
Tubal infertility associated with hydrosalpinx, severe pelvic adhesions, endometriosis or pelvic inflammatory disease were excluded.
Patients with male factor except oligoasthenospermia were also recruited for the study.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Clinical pregnancy defined as the presence of gestational sac in transvaginal ultrasonographic examination 5 weeks after embryo transfer
Time Frame: 5 weeks after embryo transfer
|
Presence of a gestational sac in transvaginal ultrasonographic examination
|
5 weeks after embryo transfer
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Implantation defined as positive serum human chorionic gonadotropin levels 12 days after embryo transfer
Time Frame: 12 days after embryo transfer
|
Positive human chorionic gonadotropin levels
|
12 days after embryo transfer
|
Fertilization defined as the presence of two pronuclei under light microscope one day after intracytoplasmic sperm injection procedure
Time Frame: 1 day after intracytoplasmic sperm injection procedure
|
Presence of two pronuclei under light microscope
|
1 day after intracytoplasmic sperm injection procedure
|
Oocyte grade assessed by four parameters (cytoplasmic granulation, properties of the polar body, the perivitelline space and properties of the zona pellucida) under invert microscope 36 hours after human chorionic gonadotropin administration
Time Frame: 36 hours after human chorionic gonadotropin administration
|
Oocytes were graded by particular criteria including cytoplasmic granulation, properties of polar body, perivitellin space and zona pellucida.
Central cytoplasmic granulation=0, homogenous cytoplasmic granulation=1; large fragmented polar bodies=0, non-fragmented polar bodies with normal size=1; presence of debris in perivitellin space=0, absence of debris in perivitelline space=1; >15 mm thickness and rough surfaced zona pellucida=0, <15 mm thickness and smooth surface zona pellucida=1.
A total of used 3-4 points were considered as Grade 1 oocytes (best quality), 2-3 points were grade 2 (moderate quality), 0-1 points were considered as grade 3 (poor quality).
|
36 hours after human chorionic gonadotropin administration
|
Embryo grade assessed under invert microscope 3 days after intracytoplasmic sperm injection procedure
Time Frame: 3 days after intracytoplasmic sperm injection procedure
|
The quality of embryos was graded from 1 to 3 under inverted microscope 3 days after intracytoplasmic sperm injection procedure.
Embryos with even-sized blastomers and/or <5% fragments were classified as Grade 1 (good quality).
Grade 2 embryos (moderate quality) had blastomeres with slightly-moderate size differences and/or 5-50% fragments.
Grade 3 embryos (poor quality) had markedly different-sized blastomers and/or >50% fragments.
|
3 days after intracytoplasmic sperm injection procedure
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: ESRA NUR TOLA, Suleyman Demirel Univercity, Medicine Faculty, Department of Gyneacology and Obstetrics
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
- Nersesyan A, Chobanyan N. Micronuclei and other nuclear anomalies levels in exfoliated buccal cells and DNA damage in leukocytes of patients with polycystic ovary syndrome. J BUON. 2010 Apr-Jun;15(2):337-9.
- Ramzan MH, Ramzan M, Khan MM, Ramzan F, Wahab F, Khan MA, Jillani M, Shah M. Human semen quality and sperm DNA damage assessed by comet assay in clinical groups. Turk J Med Sci. 2015;45(3):729-37. doi: 10.3906/sag-1407-50.
- Gunasekarana V, Raj GV, Chand P. A comprehensive review on clinical applications of comet assay. J Clin Diagn Res. 2015 Mar;9(3):GE01-5. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2015/12062.5622. Epub 2015 Mar 1.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
May 9, 2017
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
January 30, 2018
Study Completion (Anticipated)
March 30, 2018
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
November 3, 2017
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
November 12, 2017
First Posted (Actual)
November 17, 2017
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
November 24, 2017
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
November 21, 2017
Last Verified
November 1, 2017
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Other Study ID Numbers
- 7286572.050.01-29906
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
NO
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on in Vitro Fertilization
-
Mỹ Đức HospitalVrije Universiteit BrusselNot yet recruiting
-
Heilongjiang University of Chinese MedicineNot yet recruitingIn Vitro FertilizationChina
-
Organon and CoCompleted
-
Kanuni Sultan Suleyman Training and Research HospitalCompleted
-
Rambam Health Care CampusUnknownFertilization in Vitro
-
IBSA Institut Biochimique SACompletedIn Vitro FertilizationItaly, United Kingdom, Germany, Hungary, Switzerland
-
Bahceci Health GroupUnknownIn-vitro FertilizationTurkey
-
Mỹ Đức HospitalRecruitingin Vitro FertilizationVietnam