The Role of DNA Damage of Granulosa Cell on Oocyte Quality and in Vitro Fertilization Outcome

November 21, 2017 updated by: Esra Nur tola, Suleyman Demirel University
Deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) damage of granulosa cells obtained during oocyte retrieval will be evaluated by comet assay in unexplained infertile patients undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment. The oocytes will be graded by particular criteria. Fertilization, embryo quality, transfer rate, implantation, clinical pregnancy, pregnancy outcomes (gestational age at delivery, route of delivery, and birthweight etc.) will be recorded as well as demographic data. DNA damage of granulosa cells will be compared between unexplained infertile and control groups. The effect of DNA damage of granulosa cells on fertilization, quality of oocyte and embryo, implantation, and clinical pregnancy will be also evaluated.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Detailed Description

Granulosa cells surrounding the oocytes will be mechanically obtained during the oocyte pick-up procedure in women undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment due to unexplained infertility. Deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) damage in these cells will be evaluated by comet assay. The quality of oocytes retrieved during the oocyte pick-up procedure will be graded by particular criteria (zona pellucida thickness, granulation, vacuolization, etc). Fertilization rates, embryo quality by grading, and transfer rates will also be assessed. Implantation and clinical pregnancy rates, and pregnancy outcomes including gestational age at delivery, route of delivery, and birthweight will be recorded as well as demographic data such as age, body-mass index, smoking, alcohol use, employment, coexisting chronic disease, infertility duration, etiology of infertility, treatment protocol, and hormone levels on day 3. Implantation will be evaluated by determination of serum human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) at day 12 following an embryo transfer. Clinical pregnancy will be diagnosed upon presence of gestational sac on ultrasound examination. DNA damage of granulosa cells will be compared between unexplained infertile group and control group. The effect of DNA damage of granulosa cells on fertilization, quality of oocyte and embryo, implantation, and clinical pregnancy will be also evaluated.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

60

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Cunur
      • Isparta, Cunur, Turkey, 32200
      • Isparta, Cunur, Turkey, 32200
        • Recruiting
        • Suleyman Demirel University, Faculty of Medicine
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

19 years to 44 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Unexplained infertile (UI) group UI was diagnosed after normal standard infertility evaluation according to the guideline of The Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine which consist of the assesment of spermiogram, ovulation, hysterosalpingogram and if indicated ovarian reserve tests and laparoscopy. If the results of all this tests were normal, patients were accepted as UI. Control group The control group received IVF for male infertility (except azoospermia and severe oligoasthenospermia) or tubal factor included only those women who had salpingectomy for ectopic pregnancy.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Unexplained infertile patients undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Chronic systemic disease (rheumatoid arthritis, hypertension, diabetes..)
  2. Endocrinopathy (Thyroid, prolactin... abnormalities)
  3. Chemotherapy or radiotherapy history
  4. Cigarette, alcohol, chronic medication use
  5. Diminished ovarian reserve
  6. Endometriosis
  7. Having any medication use
  8. History of any surgical procedure on ovaries and uterus
  9. Smoking or alcohol consumption
  10. Severe oligoasthenospermia
  11. Tubal infertility associated with hydrosalpinx, severe pelvic adhesions, endometriosis or pelvic inflammatory disease

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Unexplained infertile group
Patients diagnosed as unexplained infertility (UI) were recruited to the study. UI was diagnosed after normal standard infertility evaluation according to the guideline of The Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine which consist of the assesment of spermiogram, ovulation, hysterosalpingogram and if indicated ovarian reserve tests and laparoscopy. If the results of all this tests were normal, patients were accepted as UI.
Control group
The control group received in vitro fertilization (IVF) for tubal factor and included only those women who had salpingectomy for ectopic pregnancy or proximal tubal obstruction because of low-grade infection or fimbrial occlusion with or without mild peritubal adhesions. Tubal infertility associated with hydrosalpinx, severe pelvic adhesions, endometriosis or pelvic inflammatory disease were excluded. Patients with male factor except oligoasthenospermia were also recruited for the study.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Clinical pregnancy defined as the presence of gestational sac in transvaginal ultrasonographic examination 5 weeks after embryo transfer
Time Frame: 5 weeks after embryo transfer
Presence of a gestational sac in transvaginal ultrasonographic examination
5 weeks after embryo transfer

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Implantation defined as positive serum human chorionic gonadotropin levels 12 days after embryo transfer
Time Frame: 12 days after embryo transfer
Positive human chorionic gonadotropin levels
12 days after embryo transfer
Fertilization defined as the presence of two pronuclei under light microscope one day after intracytoplasmic sperm injection procedure
Time Frame: 1 day after intracytoplasmic sperm injection procedure
Presence of two pronuclei under light microscope
1 day after intracytoplasmic sperm injection procedure
Oocyte grade assessed by four parameters (cytoplasmic granulation, properties of the polar body, the perivitelline space and properties of the zona pellucida) under invert microscope 36 hours after human chorionic gonadotropin administration
Time Frame: 36 hours after human chorionic gonadotropin administration
Oocytes were graded by particular criteria including cytoplasmic granulation, properties of polar body, perivitellin space and zona pellucida. Central cytoplasmic granulation=0, homogenous cytoplasmic granulation=1; large fragmented polar bodies=0, non-fragmented polar bodies with normal size=1; presence of debris in perivitellin space=0, absence of debris in perivitelline space=1; >15 mm thickness and rough surfaced zona pellucida=0, <15 mm thickness and smooth surface zona pellucida=1. A total of used 3-4 points were considered as Grade 1 oocytes (best quality), 2-3 points were grade 2 (moderate quality), 0-1 points were considered as grade 3 (poor quality).
36 hours after human chorionic gonadotropin administration
Embryo grade assessed under invert microscope 3 days after intracytoplasmic sperm injection procedure
Time Frame: 3 days after intracytoplasmic sperm injection procedure
The quality of embryos was graded from 1 to 3 under inverted microscope 3 days after intracytoplasmic sperm injection procedure. Embryos with even-sized blastomers and/or <5% fragments were classified as Grade 1 (good quality). Grade 2 embryos (moderate quality) had blastomeres with slightly-moderate size differences and/or 5-50% fragments. Grade 3 embryos (poor quality) had markedly different-sized blastomers and/or >50% fragments.
3 days after intracytoplasmic sperm injection procedure

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: ESRA NUR TOLA, Suleyman Demirel Univercity, Medicine Faculty, Department of Gyneacology and Obstetrics

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 9, 2017

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

January 30, 2018

Study Completion (Anticipated)

March 30, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 3, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 12, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

November 17, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 24, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 21, 2017

Last Verified

November 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 7286572.050.01-29906

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on in Vitro Fertilization

3
Subscribe