Randomized Comparative Study of Sleeve Gastrectomy Versus MGB and SASI Bypass , Randomized Study

June 30, 2020 updated by: tarek mahdy

Efficacy of Sleeve Gastrectomy, MGB, SASI Bypass in Type 2 Diabetes Obese Patients, Comparative Randomized Study

the investigator Randomized and compare the efficacy of 3 types of metabolic surgery in the treatment of type 2 diabetes in obese patients, one of them is SASI bypass which is a modification of Santoro's operation by performing a loop rather than Roux-en-Y bipartition reconstruction and the investigator are reporting the first comparative clinical trial as regards the clinical results of the outcomes of SASI bypass as a mode of functional restrictive and neuroendocrine modulation therapeutic option for obese type 2 diabetes.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

from 2011 to 2017, investigators Randomized and collect data for the 3 operations SASI bypass , Mini gastric bypass and Sleeve gastrectomy ) about thorough history, clinical examination and laboratory investigations including basic preoperative investigations, lipid profile, thyroid and suprarenal hormonal evaluation. In addition, patients may undergo further assessment for pulmonary functions or gastroesophageal disease including endoscope. . Abdominal ultrasound was done to exclude gall stones and to evaluate the degree of fatty liver. Reduction the size of fatty liver was done by putting all patients on low-calorie protein diet for 6 weeks. Deep vein thrombosis prophylaxis started 12 h before surgery with low molecular weight heparin subcutaneous injections . Preoperative data included age, gender, initial weight, initial body mass index (BMI), obesity complications and treatment medications used (chest problems, diabetes, arterial hypertension and cardiac ischaemia, hyperlipidemia, obstructive sleep apnea syndrome, gall stones, urinary stress incontinence, joint pain, depression, infertility and heart burn). Postoperative data included hospital stay, early postoperative complications during the first month (e.g. fever, collection, bleeding, vomiting, leak and port site problems .Long-term complications more than 1 month after surgery (e.g. nausea, vomiting, reflux, stricture, intestinal obstruction , hypoalbuminemia , anemia and calcium or iron or vitamin D , vitamin B12 deficiency and), excess weight loss and BMI were collected.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

800

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • ADULT
  • OLDER_ADULT
  • CHILD

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Type 2 diabetic obese patients

Exclusion Criteria:

  • patients age above 65 or below 18 years old
  • history of upper laparotomy
  • unfit for anesthesia or laparoscopy
  • major psychological instability
  • drug abuse

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: NA
  • Interventional Model: SINGLE_GROUP
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Diabetes Mellitus Type 2 in Obese patients
obese patients had metabolic surgery for the treatment for DMT2 .Preoperative data , which including SASI bypass , MGB and Sleeve gastrectomy
operation to cure type2 diabetes
Other Names:
  • diabetic surgery

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
excess weight loss
Time Frame: one year
The percent of excess weight loss was calculated as follows: [(preoperative weight-follow up weight)/preoperative excess weight] ×100.
one year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Resolution of diabetes
Time Frame: one year
defined in this study as a fasting plasma glucose level < 110 mg/dL or HbA1C level < 6 % without hypoglycemic medication at 1 year after surgery. whereas improvement was defined as a reduction of at least 25% in the fasting plasma glucose level and of at least 1% in the hemoglobin A1c level with hypoglycemic drug treatment
one year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

December 2, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 29, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 5, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

January 9, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 2, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 30, 2020

Last Verified

June 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Diabetes Mellitus Type 2 in Obese

Clinical Trials on metabolic surgery

3
Subscribe