Neuroimaging Biomarkers of Prognosis in Motor Functional Neurological Disorders

August 12, 2023 updated by: David Lewis Perez, Massachusetts General Hospital
Functional Neurological Disorder (FND/ Conversion Disorder) is a highly prevalent and disabling neuropsychiatric condition. Motor FND symptoms include Nonepileptic Seizures, Functional Movement Disorders and Functional Weakness. Clinical research across these motor FND subtypes, including research studies from the candidate's laboratory, suggest that these populations share many clinical and phenotypic similarities that warrant increased research integration. Furthermore, despite the prevalence of motor FND, little is known about the underlying pathophysiology of this condition, which is a prerequisite for the development of biologically informed prognostic and treatment response biomarkers. Across 3 published neurobiologically focused articles, the candidate proposed a framework through which to conceptualize motor FND. It is suggested that motor FND develops in the context of structural and functional alterations in neurocircuits mediating emotion awareness/expression, bodily awareness, viscerosomatic processing and behavioral regulation. The overall goal of this project is to comprehensively investigate structural and functional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) biomarkers of prognosis across motor FND. Multimodal structural and functional MRI techniques (including voxel-based morphometry, cortical thickness, resting-state functional connectivity and diffusion tensor imaging tractography) will be used to systemically probe brain-prognosis relationships. Novel aspects of this proposal include the study of the full spectrum of motor FND, consistent with a trans-diagnostic approach.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Functional Neurological Disorder (FND) (Conversion Disorder) is a poorly understood and prevalent somatoform disorder, making up 16% of outpatient neurology referrals. Patients with motor FND (mFND) are difficult to treat, result in major morbidity, and are costly to the US. An estimated $256 billion is spent annually treating this population. mFND includes Nonepileptic Seizures (NES), Functional Movement Disorders (FMD) and Functional Weakness (FW). An impediment to managing mFND is the lack of a neurobiological understanding for this disorder. The diagnosis of mFND is currently based on qualitative aspects of behaviors, which may be difficult to interpret, and the absence of findings characteristic of other neuropsychiatric disorders on laboratory studies such as electroencephalography (EEG) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

A major step forward would be the identification of neuroimaging biomarkers for mFND. mFND is understudied compared to other disorders, but recent studies point to distributed neurocircuit alterations associated with mFND. This project aims to advance our biological understanding of mFND by investigating neuroimaging biomarkers linked to prognosis. An improved understanding of the pathophysiology of mFND will provide a critical step in elucidating diagnostic, prognostic and treatment response biomarkers.

Aim:

Identify structural and functional biomarkers of prognosis at 6-months in patients with motor functional neurological disorders receiving an updated standard of care.

H1: Favorable mFND prognosis at 6 months post initial evaluation will be predicted by the degree of preserved baseline gray matter in limbic-paralimbic regions, particularly those part of the salience network.

H2: Favorable mFND prognosis at 6 months post initial evaluation will be predicted by the degree of preserved baseline resting-state functional connectivity in limbic/paralimbic areas, particularly those part of the salience network.

H3: Favorable mFND prognosis at 6 months will correlate with the degree of preserved baseline cingulum bundle and cingulum-insular tract integrity.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

30

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02114
        • Massachusetts General Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years to 63 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Recruitment will occur from patients receiving care in the Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) Functional Neurological Disorders Clinic

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • clinically established motor functional neurological disorder, including individuals with functional movement disorders, functional limb weakness and psychogenic nonepileptic seizures

Exclusion Criteria:

  • active suicidality
  • major medical/neurological comorbidities with known central nervous system (CNS) consequences
  • active drug use or alcohol dependence
  • known history of a primary psychotic disorder

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Motor Functional Neurological Disorder.

The cohort will consist of patients with clinically established motor functional neurological disorder, which includes individuals with functional movement disorders, psychogenic nonepileptic seizures and functional limb weakness.

Patients will be receiving the standard of care within the Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) Functional Neurological Disorders Clinic.

The updated standard of care that patient's receive in the MGH Functional Neurological Disorders Clinic includes the following:

  1. Delivery of a positive "rule-in" diagnosis of functional neurological disorder
  2. Individuals are provided with educational materials on functional neurological disorders
  3. Referred to physical therapy and/or occupational therapy as clinically indicated
  4. FND related cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) referral when appropriate
  5. Psychotropic medication management based on standard psychiatric care

The standard of care interventions for Functional Neurological Disorders (FND) include:

  1. delivery of a rule-in diagnosis
  2. providing educational materials
  3. referring to physical therapy (PT) and/or occupational therapy (OT) as clinically indicated
  4. referring to FND-related cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT)
  5. psychotropic medication management based on standard psychiatric care

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Gray Matter Volume Biomarkers of 6 Month Prognosis as Measured by Voxel Based Morphometry - Within Group Comparison
Time Frame: baseline and 6 months

Correcting for multiple comparisons in structural analyses, baseline structural grey matter volumes in limbic/paralimbic regions (particularly those affiliated with the salience network), would relate to clinical outcome in individuals receiving the standard of care at 6 months. Analyses reported refer to change in either mental health or physical health scores and baseline gray matter volume. The number presented is the peak voxel z-score as also reported in Supplementary Table 4 of the published manuscript.

Z-scores are presented in absolute values (with the lowest value being 0). A higher z-score represents a stronger correlation between a given gray matter volume value (at the peak voxel) and the measure of interest (in case mental health or physical health scores). The entry under "row title" specifies if the association is a "positive" vs a "negative" association.

baseline and 6 months
Resting State Functional Connectivity Strength Biomarkers of 6 Month Prognosis - Within Group Comparison
Time Frame: baseline and 6 months

Correcting for multiple comparisons in resting state connectivity analyses, baseline functional connectivity strength (t-statistic scores) across limbic/paralimbic regions (particularly those affiliated with the salience network), would relate to clinical outcome in individuals receiving the standard of care at 6 months. Here, we tested if link-step connectivity from primary motor areas or amygdala nuclei related to change in clinical outcome. Specifically, we are providing the t-statistic for the connectivity strength between left centromedial amygdala to right anterior insula.

Functional connectivity strength is based on the correlation of low frequency brain oscillations measured at rest. A large t-statistic value reflects greater connectivity between brain voxels.

baseline and 6 months
The Integrity of Specific White Matter Tracts (Fractional Anisotropy) as Measured by Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI) Tractography Will Relate to 6-month Prognosis
Time Frame: baseline and 6 months

Baseline integrity of the cingulum bundle and cingulate-insular tracts, as measured by fractional anisotropy, would relate to 6 month prognosis in patients with Functional Neurological Disorders (FND) receiving the standard of care.

Outcome was not assessed - no time to analyze data given prior challenges with the pandemic. Unable to report data in any table as the white matter images have not been analyzed.

baseline and 6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 1, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 20, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

January 20, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 15, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 5, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

January 12, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 29, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 12, 2023

Last Verified

August 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Conversion Disorder

Clinical Trials on Standard of Care

3
Subscribe