Effects of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy and Low Level Laser Therapy in Myofascial Pain Syndrome

February 17, 2018 updated by: Márta Király, Petz Aladar County Teaching Hospital

Comparative Study of Shock Wave Therapy and Low Level Laser Therapy Effect in Patients With Myofascial Pain Syndrome of the Trapezius

This study evaluates the effects of low level laser therapy and extracorporeal shock wave therapy in patients with myofascial pain syndrome of the upper trapezius. Half of the patients receive laser therapy, half of them receive shock wave therapy for three weeks.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Low Level Laser Therapy (LLLT) inducing photochemical and photothermal effect, increases blood flow and vascular permeability and improves cell metabolism. All these lead to muscle recovery. It also activates somatosensory receptors of the skin and reduces local pain and muscle spasm.

The specific mechanisms of extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) in treating musculoskeletal pain remain unclear. It reduces pain and inflammation by modulating nitrogen-monoxide (NO) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). It can destroy sensory unmyelinated nerve fibers, and stimulate neovascularization and collagen synthesis in degenerative tissues.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Győr, Hungary, 9025
        • Petz Aladar County Teaching Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • patients over 18 years of age with myofascial pain syndrome meeting the Simon's diagnostic criteria (5 major and 1 minor) for at least 8 weeks (chronic pain)
  • no physiotherapy or local injection within 3 months before starting the study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • acute onset of neck pain
  • physiotherapy or local injection within 3 months before starting the study
  • abnormal lab test (ESR, hematology)
  • infection, fever
  • cervical radiculopathy
  • uncontrolled hypertension, anticoagulation or defect in blood coagulation
  • previous cervical operaton

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Extracorporeal shock wave therapy group
Patients in the shock wave therapy group received total of 1000 shock waves for each treatment at the frequency of 10Hz, with 2 Bar pressure and energy flux density (EFD) of 0.25 mJ/mm2 per minute by using BTL-6000 SWT Topline Power® 3 times with a week's interval between the treatments.
shock wave therapy once a week for three weeks, total of 1000 shock waves for each treatment at the frequency of 10Hz, with 2 Bar pressure and energy flux density (EFD) of 0.25 mJ/mm2 per minute using a BTL-6000 SWT Topline Power® device
Active Comparator: Low Level Laser Therapy group
Patients in the laser therapy group received LLLT once a day for three weeks (altogether 15 working days) to the trigger points and around them in the upper trapezius. The type of laser used: PR999 4 Watt (W) scanning laser; Medical Italia®, around trigger points with 3 Joule /centimeter² (J/cm²), power 800 milliwatt (mW), frequency 2000 Hertz (Hz), on trigger points with 9 J/cm², power 2000mW, frequency 5000Hz for total of 2 minutes on each spot.
LLLT once a day for three weeks (altogether 15 working days) using a PR999 4W scanning laser device; around trigger points with 3 J/cm2, power 800 mW, frequency 2000Hz, on trigger points with 9 J/cm², power 2000mW, frequency 5000Hz for total of 2 minutes on each spot

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
change in severity of pain at rest
Time Frame: week 0 and week
change from baseline severity of pain at rest recorded on a 100 mm visual analogue scale, where 0 mm represents no pain, 100 mm represents unbearable pain.
week 0 and week
change in severity of pain at rest
Time Frame: week 0 and week 15
change from baseline severity of pain at rest recorded on a 100 mm visual analogue scale, where 0 mm represents no pain, 100 mm represents unbearable pain.
week 0 and week 15
change in severity of pressure pain
Time Frame: week 0 and week 3
change from baseline severity of pressure pain recorded on a 100 mm visual analogue scale, where 0 mm represents no pain, 100 mm represents unbearable pain.
week 0 and week 3
change in severity of pressure pain
Time Frame: week 0 and week 15
change from baseline severity of pressure pain recorded on a 100 mm visual analogue scale, where 0 mm represents no pain, 100 mm represents unbearable pain.
week 0 and week 15
change in function (percentage of disability)
Time Frame: week 0 and week 3
change from baseline Neck Disability Index (NDI) at week 3. It includes 10 part; pain intensity, personal care, lifting objects, reading, headache, concentration, work, driving, sleeping and entertainments. There are six presumptions; the first is given 0 and the last presumption has the score of 5. The total maximum score is 50, that represents 100% disability. The lower score represents better outcome.
week 0 and week 3
change in function (percentage of disability)
Time Frame: week 0 and week 15
change from baseline Neck Disability Index (NDI) at week 15. It includes 10 part; pain intensity, personal care, lifting objects, reading, headache, concentration, work, driving, sleeping and entertainments. There are six presumptions; the first is given 0 and the last presumption has the score of 5. The total maximum score is 50, that represents 100% disability. The lower score represents better outcome.
week 0 and week 15
change in quality of life
Time Frame: week 0 and week 3
change from baseline quality of life (36-Item Short Form Health Survey /SF-36/) at week 3. It consists of eight scaled scores (vitality, physical functioning, bodily pain, general health perceptions, physical role functioning, emotional role functioning, social role functioning, mental health), which are the weighted sums of the questions in their section. Each scale is directly transformed into a 0-100 scale on the assumption that each question carries equal weight. The lower the score the more the disability, i.e. a score of zero is equivalent to maximum disability.
week 0 and week 3
change in quality of life
Time Frame: week 0 and week 15
change from baseline quality of life (SF-36) at week 15. It consists of eight scaled scores (vitality, physical functioning, bodily pain, general health perceptions, physical role functioning, emotional role functioning, social role functioning, mental health), which are the weighted sums of the questions in their section. Each scale is directly transformed into a 0-100 scale on the assumption that each question carries equal weight. The lower the score the more the disability, i.e. a score of zero is equivalent to maximum disability.
week 0 and week 15

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 11, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 11, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

February 19, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 20, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 17, 2018

Last Verified

February 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Myofascial Pain Syndrome

Clinical Trials on Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy

3
Subscribe