JUVÉDERM VOLUMA® to Enhance the Appearance of the Asian Nose

A Prospective, Open-label Study of the Safety and Efficacy of JUVÉDERM VOLUMA® to Enhance the Aesthetic Appearance of the Asian Nose

A prospective, open-label, observational study of the safety and efficacy of JUVÉDERM VOLUMA® to enhance the aesthetic appearance of the Asian nose.

Study Overview

• Status: Completed
• Conditions: Asian Nose Enhancement
• Intervention / Treatment: Device: Crosslinked hyaluronic acid gel

• Study Type: Interventional
• Enrollment (Actual): 29
• Phase: Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

Study Locations

• Australia
  • New South Wales
    • Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
  • Queensland
    • Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia

Participation Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: 20 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No
• Genders Eligible for Study: All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

• Asian subjects aged 20 years of age or older with dissatisfaction of their aesthetic appearance due to structural features of their nose
• Subjects who, in the opinion of the Investigator, can achieve a clinically meaningful aesthetic correction of their nose with VOLUMA® treatment

Exclusion Criteria:

• -Subjects requiring filler treatment in or around the tip of the nose or between the eyebrows (glabellar region) to achieve a good aesthetic outcome
• prior nasal surgery, including grafts, implants or filler injection to the nose area
• Subjects with a history of sinusitis or rhinitis
• Subjects unlikely to achieve a meaningful aesthetic result with the prescribed dosage regimen of the study product.
• Subjects receiving botulinum toxin treatment for any indication within 3 months of the study or planning to receive botulinum toxin during the study
• Subjects who have previously received aesthetic treatment in the forehead, glabellar, and/or nose area with any dermal filler
• Subjects with a history of any significant adverse events caused by dermal fillers
• Subjects with a history of allergic responses to lidocaine or fillers
• Subjects who are pregnant or breastfeeding or wish to become pregnant during the study
• Subjects of child-bearing age who are not prepared to practice an adequate form of contraception during the course of the study
• Subjects with traumatic scars in the treatment area or a history of active inflammation, infection, cancerous lesion, or an unhealed wound in the treatment area
• Subjects requiring dental or oral surgery, including dental implants, during the study period
• Subjects with a history of bleeding disorders
• Subjects who are smokers
• Subjects using blood thinning products within 10 days of the screening visit
• Subjects with a history of connective tissue disease (e.g., rheumatoid arthritis, lupus, scleroderma, etc) causing skin scarring
• Subjects with a history of untreated epilepsy or other significant medical conditions
• Subjects with a history of alcoholism or drug abuse of dependence
• Subjects participating or likely to participate in another clinical trial within 30 days of screening or during the 1 year period of the study
• Subjects with any other medical condition, which in the opinion of the Investigator, might compromise the subject's ability to tolerate the injection procedure or comply with requirements of the study

Study Plan

How is the study designed?

Design Details

• Primary Purpose: Treatment
• Allocation: N/A
• Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
• Masking: None (Open Label)

Number of Arms

1

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm	Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: JUVÉDERM VOLUMA®; Participants treated with JUVÉDERM VOLUMA® up to 3 mLs administered by intradermal injection.	Device: Crosslinked hyaluronic acid gel; Up to 3 mL administered by intradermal injection; Other Names: JUVÉDERM VOLUMA®

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Percentage of Participants With a ≥ 1 Grade Improvement on the Assessment of Aesthetic Improvement Scale (AAIS) as Assessed by the Central Evaluating Physician at Day 113	The independent central evaluating physician evaluated the improvement of the participant's nose as compared to Baseline using the AAIS 5-point scale: -2 (much worse) to +2 (much improved) at Day 113. The percentage of participants with a ≥ 1 grade improvement from Baseline is reported.	Baseline, Day 113
Percentage of Participants With a ≥ 1 Grade Improvement on the AAIS as Assessed by the Patient at Day 113	The participant evaluated the improvement of their nose as compared to Baseline using the AAIS 5-point scale: -2 (much worse) to +2 (much improved) at Day 113. The percentage of participants with a ≥ 1 Grade Improvement from Baseline is reported.	Baseline, Day 113

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Percentage of Participants With a ≥ 1 Grade Improvement on the AAIS as Assessed by the Central Evaluating Physician	The independent central evaluating physician evaluated the improvement of the participant's nose compared to Baseline using the AAIS 5-point scale: -2 (much worse) to +2 (much improved) at Days 239 and 421. The percentage of participants with a ≥ 1 grade improvement from Baseline is reported.	Baseline, Days 239 and 421
Percentage of Participants With a ≥ 1 Grade Improvement on the AAIS as Assessed by the Patient	The participant evaluated the improvement of their nose as compared to Baseline using the AAIS 5-point scale: -2 (much worse) to +2 (much improved) at Days 239 and 421. The percentage of participants with a ≥ 1 grade improvement from Baseline is reported	Baseline, Days 239 and 421
Percentage of Participants Satisfied or Very Satisfied Based on the Nose Satisfaction Scale (NSS)	Participants assessed their satisfaction with the appearance of their nose at Days 113, 239 and 421 using the NSS 5-point scale: -2 (very dissatisfied) to 2 (very satisfied). The percentage of participants who rated themselves as satisfied or very satisfied is reported.	Days 113, 239 and 421
Percentage of Participants Satisfied or Very Satisfied Based on the Treatment Satisfaction Scale (TSS)	Participants assessed their satisfaction with the study drug (VOLUMA) treatment at Days 113, 239 and 421 using the TSS 5-point scale: -2 (very dissatisfied) to 2 (very satisfied). The percentage of participants satisfied or very satisfied with study drug treatment is reported.	Days 113, 239 and 421
Percentage of Participants Who Would Recommend VOLUMA Treatment of the Nose to Others		Days 113, 239 and 421

Collaborators and Investigators

• Sponsor: Allergan

Publications and helpful links

General Publications

• Liew S, Scamp T, de Maio M, Halstead M, Johnston N, Silberberg M, Rogers JD. Efficacy and Safety of a Hyaluronic Acid Filler to Correct Aesthetically Detracting or Deficient Features of the Asian Nose: A Prospective, Open-Label, Long-Term Study. Aesthet Surg J. 2016 Jul;36(7):760-72. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjw079. Epub 2016 Jun 14.

Study record dates

Study Major Dates

• Study Start (Actual): April 1, 2013
• Primary Completion (Actual): September 1, 2013
• Study Completion (Actual): August 5, 2014

Study Registration Dates

• First Submitted: May 1, 2013
• First Submitted That Met QC Criteria: May 1, 2013
• First Posted (Estimate): May 3, 2013

Study Record Updates

• Last Update Posted (Actual): April 16, 2019
• Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria: April 3, 2019
• Last Verified: April 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

• Additional Relevant MeSH Terms: Physiological Effects of Drugs; Immunologic Factors; Protective Agents; Adjuvants, Immunologic; Viscosupplements; Hyaluronic Acid
• Other Study ID Numbers: VOLXC-AP-ND-001

Drug and device information, study documents

• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product: No
• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product: No
• product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.: No