A Randomized Control Trial: Returning to Run After Injury

The purpose of this study is to examine the effectiveness of telehealth via video feedback to transition rear foot strike runners to non-heel strike runner following a lower extremity injury. Telehealth re-education gait training is much cheaper than in-clinic retraining sessions with a medical provider and could be much more widely used by both consumers and researchers as a training aid, a way to help alter running form, prevent running injuries and be used as a tool for use in the rehabilitation of running related injuries.

Study Overview

• Status: Completed
• Conditions: Knee Injuries
• Intervention / Treatment: Other: Intervention group; Other: Control group

Detailed Description

A convenience sample of 30 runners from the United States Military Academy (USMA) at West Point, New York (NY) who are recovering from a lower-extremity injury and are interested in participating in a return to run program. Acceptable lower-extremity injuries can include stress fractures proximal to the ankle, anterior chronic exertional compartment syndrome (CECS), patella-femoral pain syndrome, osteoarthritis of the lower-extremity, iliotibial band syndrome, chronic lower-extremity pain and or any participant that may benefit from the following; shorter stride, increased step rate, reduced knee loading, and reduced ground reaction force average vertical loading rates (AVLR). All participants will be screened via questionnaire and physical assessment for inclusion / exclusion from the study. Upon enrollment runners will be randomized into two groups. Regardless of group, all runners will have their running form and foot strike pattern analyzed using an instrumented treadmill and high-speed motion capture initially and at week 10. Kinetic and kinematic data including AVLR, impulse, foot strike pattern (FSP), contact time, step length, and step rate will be recorded at these time points. Additionally, all runners will receive the same graduated return to run intervals and 4-week home exercise program. Runners randomized to the intervention group will receive additional video tele-health instruction on how to transition to a non-rearfoot strike (NRFS) running pattern. Runners in the intervention group will have additional tele-health follow-ups at weeks 1, 2, 4,6, 8, and 10 using a tele-conferencing program and the Hudl Technique application. At each tele-health video follow-up participants will be emailed a questionnaire assessing their progress and function. At month 6 a final data collection session to include video analysis will be performed.

• Study Type: Interventional
• Enrollment (Actual): 30
• Phase: Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

Study Locations

• United States
  • New York
    • West Point, New York, United States, 10996
      • Keller Army Community Hospital

Participation Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: 18 years to 55 years (Adult)
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No
• Genders Eligible for Study: All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

1. Pain free walking 2 miles in 35 minutes
2. Weight bearing dorsiflexion (WBDF) Range of Motion (ROM) 80% symmetry
3. 20 unassisted single leg heel raises
4. Recovering from a lower-extremity injury

Exclusion Criteria:

1. History of previous stress fracture / fracture of the foot
2. Participant who already uses a non-rearfoot strike running pattern
3. Participant is pregnant

Study Plan

How is the study designed?

Design Details

• Primary Purpose: Treatment
• Allocation: Randomized
• Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
• Masking: Single

Number of Arms

2

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm	Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Intervention group; The experimental group will have no in person education by researchers. All education and running modification will be performed via video. Education on running form, a home exercise program, and a 4 week return to run program will be provided to the subjects through e-mail. They will also receive the same in person video analysis performed at weeks 0 (initial), 10 and 6 months to assess running kinematics.	Other: Intervention group; Runners randomized to the intervention group will receive additional video tele-health instruction on how to transition to a non-rearfoot strike (NRFS) running pattern. Runners in the intervention group will have additional tele-health follow-ups at weeks 1, 2, 4,6, 8, and 10 using a tele-conferencing program and the Hudl Technique application. At each tele-health video follow-up participants will be emailed a questionnaire assessing their progress and function. At month 6 a final data collection session to include video analysis will be performed.
Active Comparator: Control group; This group will have the same 4 week return to run program, home exercise program, and video analysis performed at weeks 0 (initial), 10 and 6 months to assess running kinematics.	Other: Control group; Control group runners will receive the same graduated return to run intervals and 4-week home exercise program. However, they will receive no video education during the initial 10 weeks.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Foot Strike Pattern	Analyzed through slow motion camera on an instrumented treadmill.	6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Perceived running pain	Subjects will self evaluate running ease and efficiency through the Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation.	6 months
Perceived running effort	Subjects will self evaluate running ease and efficiency through the University of Wisconsin Running Injury and Recovery Index.	6 months
Perceived effort of running	Subjects will self evaluate running ease and efficiency through the Patient Specific Functional Scale.	6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

• Sponsor: Keller Army Community Hospital

Study record dates

Study Major Dates

• Study Start (Actual): October 4, 2018
• Primary Completion (Actual): May 15, 2019
• Study Completion (Actual): May 15, 2019

Study Registration Dates

• First Submitted: February 7, 2018
• First Submitted That Met QC Criteria: March 30, 2018
• First Posted (Actual): April 3, 2018

Study Record Updates

• Last Update Posted (Actual): May 20, 2019
• Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria: May 17, 2019
• Last Verified: May 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

• Additional Relevant MeSH Terms: Leg Injuries; Wounds and Injuries; Knee Injuries
• Other Study ID Numbers: KACH2018

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

• Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?: No

IPD Plan Description

The principal investigator will keep your research records. These records may be looked at by staff from the Keller Army Community Hospital Department of Clinical Investigation, the Keller Army Community Hospital (KACH) Institutional Review Board (IRB), the Army Clinical Investigation Regulatory Office (CIRO), the Department of Defense (DoD) Higher Level Review, and other government agencies as part of their duties.

These duties include making sure that the research participants are protected. Your research records may be disclosed outside of the hospital, but in this case, you will be identified only by a unique code number. Information about the code will be kept in a secure location and access limited to authorized research study personnel.

This research study meets the confidentiality requirements of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA).

Drug and device information, study documents

• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product: No
• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product: No