Pictorial Warning Labels and Memory for Relative and Absolute Cigarette Health-risk Information Over Time in Teens

April 9, 2018 updated by: Ellen Peters, Ohio State University
Pictorial cigarette warning labels (PWLs) are thought to increase risk knowledge, but experimental research has not examined PWLs' longer term effects on memory for health risks. In this study, teens who have experimented with smoking or are considered vulnerable to smoking are repeatedly exposed to text-only vs. graphic warning labels paired with numeric risk information. This study will allow us to assess the extent to which reactions to warnings remain consistent over time and influence future smoking intentions. We will also assess the impact of graphic images on memory for smoking risk information presented in absolute and (a smokers lifetime risk of getting a smoking related disease), or relative (a smokers risk of getting a smoking related disease, compared to the risk of non-smokers) formats.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

422

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years to 18 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • have ever tried smoking
  • report vulnerability to smoking (i.e., report that they might smoke in the next year or would try a cigarette if a friend offered one)
  • parents give permission to participate

Exclusion Criteria:

  • not vulnerable to smoking (i.e., report they will definitely not smoke a cigarette in the next year and definitely would not try a cigarette if one was offered
  • parents do not provide permission to participate

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Factorial Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Text-only PWL, absol risk
Exposure to FDA-mandated warning labels, without a graphic image, accompanied by risk information about smoker's risk of a smoking-related disease
control condition (no image)
Percentage risk information for smoking-related diseases for smokers
Experimental: text-only PWL, relative risk
Exposure to FDA-mandated warning labels, without a graphic image, accompanied by risk information about smoker's risk and non-smoker's risk of a smoking-related disease
control condition (no image)
Percentage risk information for smoking-related diseases for smokers and non-smokers
Experimental: graphic PWL, absol risk
Exposure to FDA-mandated warning labels, paired with a graphic image, accompanied by risk information about smoker's risk of a smoking-related disease
Percentage risk information for smoking-related diseases for smokers
pictorial warning
Experimental: graphic PWL, relative risk
Exposure to FDA-mandated warning labels, paired with a graphic image, accompanied by risk information about smoker's risk and non-smoker's risk of a smoking-related disease
Percentage risk information for smoking-related diseases for smokers and non-smokers
pictorial warning

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
numeric risk recognition
Time Frame: measured immediately following last exposure
Participants answered one multiple choice question about the numeric risk for smokers for each label (e.g., ____% of smokers die before age 85). For each question, there were four decoy responses.
measured immediately following last exposure

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
numeric risk recognition
Time Frame: measured after 6-week delay
Participants answered one multiple choice question about the numeric risk for smokers for each label (e.g., ____% of smokers die before age 85). For each question, there were four decoy responses.
measured after 6-week delay
relative risk recognition
Time Frame: measured immediately following last exposure
Participants answered one multiple choice question about the numeric risk for smokers vs. nonsmokers for each health risk (e.g., a smoker is ____ as likely to die from heart disease as a nonsmoker). For each question, there were three decoy responses (e.g., for heart disease, response options were: "about as likely," "1.75 times," "4.1 times," "10.4 times").
measured immediately following last exposure
relative risk recognition
Time Frame: measured after 6-week delay
Participants answered one multiple choice question about the numeric risk for smokers vs. nonsmokers for each health risk (e.g., a smoker is ____ as likely to die from heart disease as a nonsmoker). For each question, there were three decoy responses (e.g., for heart disease, response options were: "about as likely," "1.75 times," "4.1 times," "10.4 times").
measured after 6-week delay
smoking risk perceptions
Time Frame: measured immediately following last exposure
Participants completed several scale items about how much risk they perceived smoking posed to them (e.g., "If a person smokes at your age, how likely are they to get a life-threatening illness from smoking someday ?" [1=very unlikely; 5=extremely likely])
measured immediately following last exposure
smoking risk perceptions
Time Frame: measured after 6-week delay
Participants completed several scale items about how much risk they perceived smoking posed to them (e.g., "If a person smokes at your age, how likely are they to get a life-threatening illness from smoking someday ?" [1=very unlikely; 5=extremely likely])
measured after 6-week delay
risk recognition
Time Frame: measured immediately following last exposure
Participants were given a list of 9 warnings and asked to select which ones they'd been previously exposed to
measured immediately following last exposure
risk recognition
Time Frame: measured after 6-week delay
Participants were given a list of 9 warnings and asked to select which ones they'd been previously exposed to
measured after 6-week delay
feelings about smoking
Time Frame: measured immediately following last exposure
Participants completed several scale items about their feelings towards smoking (e.g., "How good or bad do you feel about smoking?" -2=very bad; +2=very good; "How much do you feel confused about the harms vs. benefits of smoking?" 0=not at all confused; 4=very confused)
measured immediately following last exposure
feelings about smoking
Time Frame: measured after 6-week delay
Participants completed several scale items about their feelings towards smoking (e.g., "How good or bad do you feel about smoking?" -2=very bad; +2=very good; "How much do you feel confused about the harms vs. benefits of smoking?" 0=not at all confused; 4=very confused)
measured after 6-week delay
quit intentions (for next 30 days)
Time Frame: measured immediately following last exposure

Participants intentions to quit smoking; self-reported likelihood of smoking "within the next 30 days" (-3 = very unlikely, 3 = very likely)

(only for those teens who currently smoked)

measured immediately following last exposure
quit intentions (for next 30 days)
Time Frame: measured after 6-week delay

Participants intentions to quit smoking; self-reported likelihood of smoking "within the next 30 days" (-3 = very unlikely, 3 = very likely)

(only for those teens who currently smoked)

measured after 6-week delay
quit intentions (for next year)
Time Frame: measured immediately following last exposure

Participants intentions to quit smoking; self-reported likelihood of smoking "within the next year" (-3 = very unlikely, 3 = very likely)

only for those teens who currently smoked

measured immediately following last exposure
quit intentions (for next year)
Time Frame: measured after 6-week delay

Participants intentions to quit smoking; self-reported likelihood of smoking "within the next year" (-3 = very unlikely, 3 = very likely)

only for those teens who currently smoked

measured after 6-week delay

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 25, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 9, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

January 9, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 14, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 9, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

April 18, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 18, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 9, 2018

Last Verified

April 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • P50CA180908A2a-T
  • P50CA180908 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Smoking Cessation

Clinical Trials on text-only PWL

3
Subscribe