Pivotal Study of eCoin for Overactive Bladder With Urgency Urinary Incontinence

September 16, 2025 updated by: Valencia Technologies Corporation

Pivotal Study of Subcutaneous Tibial Nerve Stimulation With eCoin for Overactive Bladder (OAB) With Urgency Urinary Incontinence (UUI)

This trial is a prospective, multicenter, single-arm study of the safety and effectiveness of eCoinTM tibial nerve stimulation in subjects having overactive bladder (OAB) with urgency urinary incontinence (UUI). The study will evaluate changes from baseline in OAB symptoms as measured by voiding diaries and patient reported-outcomes through 48 weeks of eCoinTM therapy or 52 weeks of implantation.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This study enrolled and implanted 133 subjects at 15 sites in the US under the original IDE.

Subjects were given the option to extend out to 3 years post activation, with annual visits at 2 and 3 years post activation (96 and 144 weeks post-activation).

Subjects who are still active in the original IDE study will be offered consecutive enrollment in the post approval study and will be given the option to receive a new implant. Subjects who are no longer active, or have exited the study will be given the option to reenter the study and complete two follow-up visits. Subjects re-entering the study will not have the option to receive a new implant. Post approval follow-up of subjects will occur through the year 5 visit (257 weeks post-activation of their original device). Reimplantation of a new eCoin would not reset their follow-up clock.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

133

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Downey, California, United States, 90242
        • Kaiser Permanente
      • Redwood City, California, United States, 94062
        • Sequoia Urology Center
      • San Diego, California, United States, 92110
        • Kaiser Permanente
      • Santa Barbara, California, United States, 93105
        • Sansum Clinic
    • Colorado
      • Englewood, Colorado, United States, 80113
        • SurgOne PC
    • Connecticut
      • Norwalk, Connecticut, United States, 06850
        • Urology Associates of Norwalk
    • Florida
      • Naples, Florida, United States, 34109
        • Florida Bladder Institute
    • Illinois
      • Skokie, Illinois, United States, 60076
        • North Shore Medical Group
    • Iowa
      • Waterloo, Iowa, United States, 50703
        • UnityPoint Clinic
    • Maryland
      • Owings Mills, Maryland, United States, 21117
        • Chesapeake Urology
    • Nebraska
      • Omaha, Nebraska, United States, 68114
        • Adult & Pediatric Urology
    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10016
        • Manhattan Medical Research
    • North Carolina
      • Greensboro, North Carolina, United States, 27403
        • Alliance Urology Specialists
    • Pennsylvania
      • Allentown, Pennsylvania, United States, 18103
        • The Institute for Female Pelvic Medicine & Reconstructive Surgery (FPM Institute)
    • South Carolina
      • Columbia, South Carolina, United States, 29201
        • South Carolina OB/GYN

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Primary Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Women and men between 18 and 80 years old.
  2. Diagnosis of overactive bladder with urgency urinary incontinence or mixed urge and stress incontinence with a predominant urgency component (selfreported), for at least 6 months.
  3. Individual is without pharmacological treatment of overactive bladder (antimuscarinics and beta-3 agonists).
  4. Individual is intolerant of or has an inadequate response to any of anticholinergics, β3-adrenoceptor agonists, onabotulinumtoxinA, or percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation.

Primary Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Predominant stress urinary incontinence with more than 1/3 stress urinary incontinent episodes when compared to total urinary incontinent episodes.
  2. Clinically significant bladder outlet obstruction.
  3. Clinically significant pelvic organ prolapse beyond the hymenal ring.
  4. Inadequate skin integrity or any evidence of an infection or inflammation in either lower leg.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: eCoin Tibial Nerve Stimulation
Subcutaneous stimulation of the tibial nerve using the eCoin device.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Subjects Experiencing 50% or Better Improvement in Urgency Urinary Incontinence Episodes as Measured by a 3-day Voiding Diary.
Time Frame: 48 weeks after device activation.
Responder rate
48 weeks after device activation.
Long-term Safety in All Patients. Percentage of Patients With Device Related Adverse Events.
Time Frame: 52 weeks after implantation.
All adverse events will be reported in all patients up to 52 weeks after implantation.
52 weeks after implantation.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Moderate-term Effectiveness Data. Percentage of Subjects Experiencing 50% or Better Improvement in Urgency Urinary Incontinence Episodes as Measured by a 3-day Voiding Diary.
Time Frame: 24 weeks after device activation
Moderate-term effectiveness data, responder rate
24 weeks after device activation
Moderate-term Safety in All Patients. Percentage of Patients With Device Related Adverse Events.
Time Frame: 28 weeks after implantation
All adverse events will be reported.
28 weeks after implantation
Percentage of Subjects Experiencing 50% or Better Improvement in Urgency Urinary Incontinence Episodes as Measured by a 3-day Voiding Diary
Time Frame: 96 weeks after device activation.
Responder rate
96 weeks after device activation.
Percentage of Subjects Experiencing 50% or Better Improvement in Urgency Urinary Incontinence Episodes as Measured by a 3-day Voiding Diary.
Time Frame: 144 weeks after device activation
Responder rate
144 weeks after device activation
Percentage of Subjects Experiencing 50% or Better Improvement in Urgency Urinary Incontinence Episodes as Measured by a 3-day Voiding Diary.
Time Frame: 205 weeks after device activation
Responder rate
205 weeks after device activation
Percentage of Subjects Experiencing 50% or Better Improvement in Urgency Urinary Incontinence Episodes as Measured by a 3-day Voiding Diary.
Time Frame: 257 weeks after device activation
Responder rate
257 weeks after device activation
Long-term Safety in All Patients: Percentage of Patients With Device Related Adverse Events.
Time Frame: 96 weeks after implantation
All adverse events will be reported in all patients up to 96 weeks after implantation.
96 weeks after implantation
Long-term Safety in All Patients: Percentage of Patients With Device Related Adverse Events
Time Frame: 144 weeks after implantation
All adverse events will be reported in all patients up to 144 weeks after implantation.
144 weeks after implantation
Long-term Safety in All Patients. Percentage of Patients With Device Related Adverse Events
Time Frame: 205 weeks after implantation
All adverse events will be reported in all patients up to 205 weeks after implantation.
205 weeks after implantation
Long-term Safety in All Patients. Percentage of Patients With Device Related Adverse Events
Time Frame: 257 weeks after implantation
All adverse events will be reported in all patients up to 257 weeks after implantation.
257 weeks after implantation

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Scott MacDiarmid, MD, Alliance Urology

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 4, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 12, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

September 18, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 22, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 3, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

June 14, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

October 2, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 16, 2025

Last Verified

September 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Overactive Bladder

Clinical Trials on eCoin Tibial Nerve Stimulation

Subscribe