- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03592537
Fentanyl Versus Midazolam as an Adjunct to Intrathecal Bupivacaine In Children
Fentanyl Versus Midazolam as an Adjunct to Intrathecal Bupivacaine for Postoperative Analgesia in Children Undergoing Infraumbilical Surgery
The primary aim of the present study will be to compare the analgesic effect of addition of fentanyl or midazolam to intrathecal bupivacaine by using CHEOPS pain score (Children's Hospital Eastern Ontario Pain Scale) which is based on 6 criteria: crying, facial expression, child verbal expression, torso (body position), touching or grabbing at wound and legs position. Criterion 1 is given a score of 1-3, criteria 2 and 3 are given a score of 0-2 while criteria 4, 5 and 6 are given a score of 1-2; making the worst possible score 13 while the least possible score is 4. A total score ⩽ than 6 indicates adequate analgesia.
Secondary outcomes of study will be;
- is to compare the duration of postoperative analgesia.
- comparative assessment regarding time for first analgesic request ,total analgesic requirements.
- Hemodynamic changes or other adverse events will be recorded.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Spinal anesthesia (SA) in pediatrics began to be used in the late nineteenth century in multiple procedures, with the priority for high-risk and former preterm infants, for its suggested protective role compared to the development of postoperative apnea with general anesthesia (GA) . Regional anesthesia offers several advantages over general anesthesia-blunts stress response to surgery, decreases intraoperative blood loss, lowers the incidence of postoperative thromboembolic events, and provides analgesia in early postoperative period .
Spinal anesthesia has been Proposed as a means to reduce postoperative complications especially apnea and postoperative respiratory dysfunction. Prolongation of pain relief can be accomplished by various adjuvants like opioids (morphine, fentanyl, ketamine and clonidine. However, each drug has its limitations and side effects, and the need for an alternative methods and drugs always exists. Of the several opioids available for neuro-axial administration, morphine and fentanyl remain the most commonly used agents. Because of the more lipophilic nature of fentanyl, it has a more rapid onset of action than morphine.
Intrathecal fentanyl produce profound analgesia by making direct contact with the substantia-gelatinosa of the cord and it also provides cephalad extend of sensorial block. The addition of intrathecal fentanyl to spinal anesthesia improves the intraoperative and the early postoperative quality of analgesia, relieves visceral pain and attenuates sympathetic activation during surgery . The addition of intrathecal midazolam gives the best prophylaxis against intraoperative and postoperative nausea and vomiting , also various studies have shown that the analgesic effect of intrathecal bupivacaine is enhanced by intrathecal midazolam without producing significant side effects.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Phase 2
- Phase 3
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Asyut
-
Assiut, Asyut, Egypt, 715715
- Pediatric hospital,assiut university
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- children aged 6-8years
- undergoing infra-umbilical surgery.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Children with a known history of bleeding diathesis,
- allergy to local anesthetics,
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Quadruple
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Active Comparator: fentanyl
Group F: will receive intrathecal 0.5% bupivacaine (0.3 mg/kg) + (5ug) of fentanyl intrathecally
|
The study drugs will be prepared by an anesthesiologist not involved in performing the anesthesia patient care or in data collection.
Children will be randomly allocated into three groups of 30 children
Other Names:
|
Active Comparator: midazolam
Group M: will receive intrathecal 0.5% bupivacaine (0.3 mg/kg) + 0.5 mg of midazolam intrathecally
|
The study drugs will be prepared by an anesthesiologist not involved in performing the anesthesia, patient care, or in data collection.
Children will be randomly allocated into three groups of 30 children
Other Names:
|
Placebo Comparator: Bupivacaine
Group B:intrathecal 0.5% bupivacaine (0.3 mg/kg)
|
The study drugs will be prepared by an anesthesiologist not involved in performing the anesthesia, patient care, or in data collection.
Children will be randomly allocated into three groups of 30 children
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
postoperative analgesia
Time Frame: 24 hours
|
CHEOPS pain score (Children's Hospital Eastern Ontario Pain Scale) which is based on 6 criteria: crying, facial expression, child verbal expression, torso (body position), touching or grabbing at wound and legs position.
Criterion 1 is given a score of 1-3, criteria 2 and 3 are given a score of 0-2 while criteria 4, 5 and 6 are given a score of 1-2; making the worst possible score 13 while the least possible score is 4. A total score ⩽ than 6 indicates adequate analgesia.
|
24 hours
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
---|---|
to compare the duration of postoperative analgesia. comparative assessment regarding time for first analgesic request ,total analgesic requirements and any adverse effects.
Time Frame: 24hour
|
24hour
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Wesam N Ali, MD, Lecturer
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Chattopadhyay A, Maitra S, Sen S, Bhattacharjee S, Layek A, Pal S, Ghosh K. A study to compare the analgesic efficacy of intrathecal bupivacaine alone with intrathecal bupivacaine midazolam combination in patients undergoing elective infraumbilical surgery. Anesthesiol Res Pract. 2013;2013:567134. doi: 10.1155/2013/567134. Epub 2013 May 15.
- Duman A, Apiliogullari S, Duman I. Effects of intrathecal fentanyl on quality of spinal anesthesia in children undergoing inguinal hernia repair. Paediatr Anaesth. 2010 Jun;20(6):530-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2010.03315.x. Epub 2010 Apr 23.
- Dodawad R, G B S, Pandarpurkar S, Jajee P. Intrathecal Midazolam as an Adjuvant in Pregnancy-Induced Hypertensive Patients Undergoing an Elective Caesarean Section: A Clinical Comparative Study. Anesth Pain Med. 2016 Jul 26;6(5):e38550. doi: 10.5812/aapm.38550. eCollection 2016 Oct.
- Lopez T, Sanchez FJ, Garzon JC, Muriel C. Spinal anesthesia in pediatric patients. Minerva Anestesiol. 2012 Jan;78(1):78-87. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2011.03769.x. Epub 2011 Dec 28.
- Sanwatsarkar S, Kapur S, Saxena D, Yadav G, Khan NN. Comparative study of caudal clonidine and midazolam added to bupivacaine during infra-umbilical surgeries in children. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2017 Apr-Jun;33(2):241-247. doi: 10.4103/0970-9185.209739.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Physiological Effects of Drugs
- Neurotransmitter Agents
- Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action
- Central Nervous System Depressants
- Peripheral Nervous System Agents
- Analgesics
- Sensory System Agents
- Anesthetics, Intravenous
- Anesthetics, General
- Anesthetics
- Analgesics, Opioid
- Narcotics
- Tranquilizing Agents
- Psychotropic Drugs
- Hypnotics and Sedatives
- Adjuvants, Anesthesia
- Anti-Anxiety Agents
- GABA Modulators
- GABA Agents
- Anesthetics, Local
- Fentanyl
- Midazolam
- Bupivacaine
Other Study ID Numbers
- Fentanyl versus midazolam
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Postoperative Analgesia
-
Cukurova UniversityCompleted
-
Suez Canal UniversityCompleted
-
Tanta UniversityCompleted
-
Ain Shams UniversityCompleted
-
Minia UniversityCompletedPostoperative AnalgesiaEgypt
-
Minia UniversityCompletedPostoperative AnalgesiaEgypt
-
Assiut UniversityUnknown
-
Istanbul UniversityCompletedPostoperative Analgesia
-
Assiut UniversityCompletedPostoperative Analgesia
-
National Cancer Institute, EgyptNational Cancer Institute (NCI)Not yet recruitingPostoperative Analgesia
Clinical Trials on Fentanyl
-
University of Maryland, BaltimoreFood and Drug Administration (FDA)CompletedPeer Review, ResearchUnited States
-
Alexza Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Completed
-
University of Maryland, BaltimoreFood and Drug Administration (FDA)Completed
-
University of Texas Southwestern Medical CenterCompletedPregnancyUnited States
-
Samuel Lunenfeld Research Institute, Mount Sinai...Terminated
-
University of PatrasUnknownStillborn Caesarean SectionGreece
-
Janssen Research & Development, LLCCompleted
-
Johns Hopkins UniversityCompletedIntracranial SurgeryUnited States
-
Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, BellinzonaNot yet recruiting