Teaching Academic Success Skills to Students With Autism Spectrum Disorders in Clinical Setting (TASK-R21)

Teaching Academic Success Skills to Middle School Students With Autism Spectrum Disorders (ASD) With Executive Functioning Deficits - in Clinical Setting

The goal of the study is to develop an academic EF intervention, Teaching Academic Skills to Kids (TASK), for high functioning (i.e., IQ score ≥80) middle-school youth with ASD and EF deficits.

Aim 1: Use focus group methodology and advice from expert consultants to develop the TASK intervention targeting academic EF skills for middle school youth with ASD that is tailored to the unique needs of these individuals (e.g., content specific to ASD EF deficits, incorporate evidence-based teaching principles and methods for ASD).

Aim 2: Examine the feasibility and acceptability of TASK in 3 open trials to assess initial feasibility and efficacy.

Study Overview

• Status: Completed
• Conditions: Autism Spectrum Disorder
• Intervention / Treatment: Behavioral: Teaching Academic Skills to Kids

Detailed Description

The goal of the study is to develop an academic EF intervention, Teaching Academic Skills to Kids (TASK), for high functioning (i.e., IQ score ≥80) middle-school youth with ASD and EF deficits.

Aim 1: Develop the TASK intervention targeting academic EF skills for middle school youth with ASD that is tailored to the unique needs of these individuals (e.g., content specific to ASD EF deficits, incorporate evidence-based teaching principles and methods for ASD). A methodologically rigorous, well-integrated iterative and collaborative design process with input from multiple stakeholders, including school mental health professionals, teachers, parents, and youth with ASD, will be utilized.

Aim 2: Examine the feasibility and acceptability of TASK in 3 open trials including the feasibility of: 1) implementing the measurement protocol, 2) operationalizing intervention delivery, 3) assessing both trained and untrained areas of functioning, 4) assessing whether improvements in academic EF skills (proposed mechanism of treatment) are related to functional educational outcomes (e.g., homework behaviors, grades), and 5) exploring the data for potential treatment moderators (e.g., gender, severity). It is hypothesized that TASK will be feasible, acceptable (attendance, satisfaction), and will result in improved academic EF skills associated with reduced academic impairment and homework problems.

• Study Type: Interventional
• Enrollment (Actual): 21
• Phase: Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

Study Locations

• United States
  • Ohio
    • Cincinnati, Ohio, United States, 45229
      • Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: 11 years to 14 years (Child)
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No
• Genders Eligible for Study: All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

• Diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder
• IQ >80
• 7th grade at time of intervention
• mainstreamed classroom
• executive functioning problems identified on parent or teacher BRIEF-2

Exclusion Criteria:

• danger to self or others

Study Plan

How is the study designed?

Design Details

• Primary Purpose: Treatment
• Allocation: N/A
• Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
• Masking: None (Open Label)

Number of Arms

1

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm	Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Open Trial; Group based treatment targeting academic executive functioning skills such as organization, planning, and study skills. Likely to be 7 90-minute sessions attended weekly by parents and teens	Behavioral: Teaching Academic Skills to Kids; Group treatment

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Children's Organizational Skills Scale	The Children's Organizational Skills Scale is a rating scale of organization and executive functioning. A T-score is reported. A T-score of 50 indicates the population mean with a standard deviation of 10. Range of possible T-scores is 40 to 90. Higher T-scores indicate poorer organization/executive functioning. We present baseline (before intervention) and 3 month outcome (post intervention) T-scores as rated by the parent.	baseline, 3 months
Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function - Second Edition	The Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function - Second Edition is a parent rating scale of executive functioning. A T-score is reported. A T-score of 50 indicates the population mean with a standard deviation of 10. Range of possible T-scores is 40 to 90. Higher T-scores indicate poorer executive functioning. We present baseline (before intervention) and 3 month outcome (post intervention) T-scores.	baseline, 3 months
Homework Problem Checklist	The Homework Problem Checklist is a rating scale of homework behavior completed by the parent. There are two subscales generated: Homework Completion Behaviors & Homework Management Behaviors. Scale is rated on a 0 = never to 3 = very often scale and a sum of scores is computed for each subscale. Range of scores for Homework Completion Behaviors is 0 to 36. Range of scores for Homework Management Behaviors is 0 to 21. We present baseline (before intervention) and 3 month outcome (post intervention) scores for each subscale. Higher scores indicate worse outcome.	baseline, 3 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Woodcock Johnson Tests of Achievement - Third Edition Basic Writing Subtest	The Woodcock Johnson is an academic performance measure administered to the child. A standard score of 100 indicates the population mean with a standard deviation of 15 (range of 40 to 170). Lower standard scores are worse. We present baseline (before intervention) and 3 month outcome (post intervention) for the Basic Writing subtest.	baseline, 3 months
Classroom Performance Survey	The Classroom Performance Survey is a teacher rating scale of classroom behavior. The scale is rated 1 = always to 5 = never. An academic competence mean score is computed (range 1 to 5) with higher scores indicating a worse outcome. We present baseline (before intervention) and 3 month outcome (post intervention) total mean score.	baseline, 3 months
Academic Performance Rating System	The Academic Performance Rating System is a teacher rating scale of academic performance. Items are rated 1 = Never to 5 = Very often and the items are summed to generate a Total Score (range 19 to 95) with higher scores worse indicating a worse outcome. We present the Total score at baseline (before intervention) and 3 month outcome (post intervention).	baseline, 3 months
Parenting Relationship Questionnaire - Communication Subscale	The Parenting Relationship Questionnaire is completed by parents to describe their parenting relationship with the teen. A T-score is reported for the Communication subscale. A T-score of 50 indicates the population mean with a standard deviation of 10. Range of possible T-scores is 40 to 90. Lower T-scores indicate poorer communication. We present baseline (before intervention) and 3 month outcome (post intervention) T-scores.	baseline, 3 months

Collaborators and Investigators

• Sponsor: Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati
• Collaborators: Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)

Study record dates

Study Major Dates

• Study Start (Actual): September 1, 2017
• Primary Completion (Actual): August 31, 2020
• Study Completion (Actual): August 31, 2020

Study Registration Dates

• First Submitted: May 16, 2018
• First Submitted That Met QC Criteria: July 27, 2018
• First Posted (Actual): July 30, 2018

Study Record Updates

• Last Update Posted (Actual): December 17, 2020
• Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria: November 24, 2020
• Last Verified: November 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

• Additional Relevant MeSH Terms: Mental Disorders; Neurodevelopmental Disorders; Autistic Disorder; Autism Spectrum Disorder; Child Development Disorders, Pervasive
• Other Study ID Numbers: R21HD090334-01A1 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

• Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?: YES
• IPD Plan Description: Data will be shared with other researchers via the National Database for Autism Research (NDAR) without exposing personally identifiable information.
• IPD Sharing Time Frame: after August 31, 2019 when study is completed, indefinitely available.
• IPD Sharing Access Criteria: specified by NDAR
• IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type: STUDY_PROTOCOL

Drug and device information, study documents

• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product: No
• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product: No