- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03622099
Small Volume Fluid Challenge as a Predictor of Fluid Responsiveness in Patients With Circulatory Failure
April 24, 2019 updated by: Abd-Elazeem Abd-Elhameed Elbakry, Menoufia University
Transthoracic Echocardiography Guided Small Volume Fluid Challenge as a Predictor of Fluid Responsiveness in Patients With Circulatory Failure: An Observational Study
Assessment of intravascular volume status is difficult in critically ill patients.
Evidence suggests that only 50% of hemodynamically unstable patients respond to a fluid challenge.
Moreover, if cardiopulmonary function cannot compensate for the increase in preload, fluid loading may compromise microvascular perfusion and oxygen delivery and cause or aggravate peripheral and pulmonary edema.
Inappropriate fluid expansion can increase morbidity and mortality thus making it important to accurately assess fluid responsiveness in critically ill patients.
The volume responsiveness can be defined as a 15% increase in stroke volume (SV) or cardiac output (CO) after a 500-ml infusion.
This study tested whether echocardiographic parameters can predict fluid responsiveness in critically ill patients following a low volume 100-ml crystalloid solution infusion over 1 minute.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Fifty-four adult patients with circulatory failure were recruited for the study.
As a routine work in adult critical care unit at Menoufia University hospital for patients with circulatory failure, a 100 ml bolus of normal saline solution was given to the patient over 1 minute through a central venous catheter or jugular cannula.
For prediction of responders, echocardiographic parameters were recorded1 minute after bolus administration.
The remaining 400 ml of normal saline solution was infused at a constant rate over 10 minutes, and echocardiographic parameters were recorded again.
The mean echocardiographic measurements over three consecutive respiratory cycles were recorded along with heart rate HR, systolic, diastolic and mean arterial pressures, central venous pressure, and Temperature also mechanical ventilation parameter (tidal volume, respiratory rate and PEEP) for each patient.
Patients with an increase in CO after a 100 ml or total 500-ml infusion over 10 minutes (ΔCO500) of 15% or more were classified as responders (Rs) and those without an increase in CO was classified as non-responders
Study Type
Observational
Enrollment (Actual)
54
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Shebin El-kom
-
Cairo, Shebin El-kom, Egypt, 32511
- Faculty of medicine
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years to 60 years (Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Sampling Method
Non-Probability Sample
Study Population
in a general adult critical care unit (CCU) at Menoufia University Hospitals
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients with acute circulatory failure
- Mechanically ventilated & sedated.(Tidal volume 6-8 ml/ kg, PEEP 5 mmHg, Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale RASS (R) Score from zero to -3).
- Systemic inflammatory response syndrome
- Septic shock
- Controlled massive hemorrhage
Exclusion Criteria:
- Age of less than 18 years
- Cardiomyopathy
- Pulmonary edema
- Morbid obesity
- Pregnancy
- Increased intracranial tension
- Valvular heart disease
- Myocardial ischemia or infarction before the study
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / Cohort |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
The study group
As a routine work in adult critical care unit at Menoufia University hospital for patients with circulatory failure, A 100 ml bolus of Normal Saline Flush, 0.9% Injectable Solution was given to the patient over 1 minute through a central venous catheter or jugular cannula.
For prediction of responders, echocardiographic parameters measured followed by infusion of the remaining 400 ml of Normal Saline Flush, 0.9% Injectable Solution at a constant rate over 10 minutes then echocardiographic parameters measured again to detect the patient response.
|
As a routine work in adult critical care unit at Menoufia University hospital for patients with circulatory failure, A 100 ml bolus of Normal Saline Flush, 0.9% Injectable Solution was given to the patient over 1 minute through a central venous catheter or jugular cannula.
For prediction of responders, echocardiographic parameters measured followed by infusion of the remaining 400 ml of Normal Saline Flush, 0.9% Injectable Solution at a constant rate over 10 minutes then echocardiographic parameters measured again to detect the patient response.
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Aortic blood flow velocity Time Integral changes from the baseline
Time Frame: Baseline 10 minutes before start of fluid challenge and1 minute after fluid challenge
|
[cm]
|
Baseline 10 minutes before start of fluid challenge and1 minute after fluid challenge
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
stroke volume change from the baseline
Time Frame: Baseline 10 minutes before start of fluid challenge and1 minute after fluid challenge
|
[ml/beat]
|
Baseline 10 minutes before start of fluid challenge and1 minute after fluid challenge
|
cardiac output change from the baseline
Time Frame: Baseline 10 minutes before start of fluid challenge and1 minute after fluid challenge
|
[ liter/minute]
|
Baseline 10 minutes before start of fluid challenge and1 minute after fluid challenge
|
heart rate change from the baseline
Time Frame: Baseline 10 minutes before start of fluid challenge and1 minute after fluid challenge
|
[beats/minute]
|
Baseline 10 minutes before start of fluid challenge and1 minute after fluid challenge
|
systolic blood pressure change from the baseline
Time Frame: Baseline 10 minutes before start of fluid challenge and1 minute after fluid challenge
|
[mmHg]
|
Baseline 10 minutes before start of fluid challenge and1 minute after fluid challenge
|
Diastolic blood pressure change from the baseline
Time Frame: Baseline 10 minutes before start of fluid challenge and1 minute after fluid challenge
|
[mmHg]
|
Baseline 10 minutes before start of fluid challenge and1 minute after fluid challenge
|
Central venous pressure change from the baseline
Time Frame: Baseline 10 minutes before start of fluid challenge and1 minute after fluid challenge
|
[Cm water]
|
Baseline 10 minutes before start of fluid challenge and1 minute after fluid challenge
|
Mean arterial blood pressure change from the baseline
Time Frame: Baseline 10 minutes before start of fluid challenge and1 minute after fluid challenge
|
[mmHg]
|
Baseline 10 minutes before start of fluid challenge and1 minute after fluid challenge
|
Left ventricular end systolic diameter change from the baseline
Time Frame: Baseline 10 minutes before start of fluid challenge and1 minute after fluid challenge
|
[Cm]
|
Baseline 10 minutes before start of fluid challenge and1 minute after fluid challenge
|
Left ventricular end diastolic diameter change from the baseline
Time Frame: Baseline 10 minutes before start of fluid challenge and1 minute after fluid challenge
|
[Cm]
|
Baseline 10 minutes before start of fluid challenge and1 minute after fluid challenge
|
Aortic root diameter change from the baseline
Time Frame: Baseline 10 minutes before start of fluid challenge and1 minute after fluid challenge
|
[Cm]
|
Baseline 10 minutes before start of fluid challenge and1 minute after fluid challenge
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Investigators
- Study Chair: Abd-Elazeem A Elbakry, M.D, Menofia University
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
September 7, 2018
Primary Completion (Actual)
February 5, 2019
Study Completion (Actual)
February 26, 2019
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
July 30, 2018
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
August 4, 2018
First Posted (Actual)
August 9, 2018
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
April 25, 2019
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
April 24, 2019
Last Verified
April 1, 2019
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2017/3/1/4
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
YES
IPD Plan Description
the paper protocol only we share if the paper is published in a closed access journal.
For open access no problem for sharing the whole data
IPD Sharing Time Frame
starting 6 months after publication
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
through the clinical trial registry site or contact by my e-mail
IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type
- STUDY_PROTOCOL
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Circulatory Failure
-
Hospices Civils de LyonCompleted
-
Centre Hospitalier ArrasCompletedAcute Circulatory FailureFrance
-
Hospices Civils de LyonCompleted
-
University Hospital, BordeauxCompletedCirculatory Failure (Shock)France
-
University Hospital, AngersRecruitingShock | Hemodynamic Monitoring | Acute Circulatory FailureFrance
-
Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam...RecruitingExtracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Complication | Cerebral Circulatory FailureNetherlands
-
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de NīmesCompleted
-
Association pour le Développement et l'Organisation...CompletedAcute Circulatory Failure
-
Nantes University HospitalUnknownAcute Circulatory FailureFrance
-
University of MonastirCompletedAcute Circulatory FailureTunisia
Clinical Trials on Normal Saline Flush, 0.9% Injectable Solution
-
Yasser S Mostafa, MDFayoum University HospitalRecruiting
-
McGill University Health Centre/Research Institute...Not yet recruitingHeart Diseases | Delirium | Cognitive Decline
-
University of Texas Southwestern Medical CenterCompleted
-
MiMedx Group, Inc.CompletedFasciitis, PlantarUnited States
-
Eyelid and Facial ConsultantsOchsner Health SystemUnknownBrow Ptosis | Facial ScarringUnited States
-
Virginia Commonwealth UniversityTerminatedRib FracturesUnited States
-
Fayoum University HospitalRecruitingHypotension Drug-InducedEgypt
-
Hiroaki Sato, MD., PhD.Not yet recruiting
-
Kedrion S.p.A.inVentiv Health ClinicalTerminated
-
Sunnybrook Health Sciences CentreCompleted