Small Volume Fluid Challenge as a Predictor of Fluid Responsiveness in Patients With Circulatory Failure

April 24, 2019 updated by: Abd-Elazeem Abd-Elhameed Elbakry, Menoufia University

Transthoracic Echocardiography Guided Small Volume Fluid Challenge as a Predictor of Fluid Responsiveness in Patients With Circulatory Failure: An Observational Study

Assessment of intravascular volume status is difficult in critically ill patients. Evidence suggests that only 50% of hemodynamically unstable patients respond to a fluid challenge. Moreover, if cardiopulmonary function cannot compensate for the increase in preload, fluid loading may compromise microvascular perfusion and oxygen delivery and cause or aggravate peripheral and pulmonary edema. Inappropriate fluid expansion can increase morbidity and mortality thus making it important to accurately assess fluid responsiveness in critically ill patients. The volume responsiveness can be defined as a 15% increase in stroke volume (SV) or cardiac output (CO) after a 500-ml infusion. This study tested whether echocardiographic parameters can predict fluid responsiveness in critically ill patients following a low volume 100-ml crystalloid solution infusion over 1 minute.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Fifty-four adult patients with circulatory failure were recruited for the study. As a routine work in adult critical care unit at Menoufia University hospital for patients with circulatory failure, a 100 ml bolus of normal saline solution was given to the patient over 1 minute through a central venous catheter or jugular cannula. For prediction of responders, echocardiographic parameters were recorded1 minute after bolus administration. The remaining 400 ml of normal saline solution was infused at a constant rate over 10 minutes, and echocardiographic parameters were recorded again. The mean echocardiographic measurements over three consecutive respiratory cycles were recorded along with heart rate HR, systolic, diastolic and mean arterial pressures, central venous pressure, and Temperature also mechanical ventilation parameter (tidal volume, respiratory rate and PEEP) for each patient. Patients with an increase in CO after a 100 ml or total 500-ml infusion over 10 minutes (ΔCO500) of 15% or more were classified as responders (Rs) and those without an increase in CO was classified as non-responders

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

54

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Shebin El-kom
      • Cairo, Shebin El-kom, Egypt, 32511
        • Faculty of medicine

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 60 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

in a general adult critical care unit (CCU) at Menoufia University Hospitals

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with acute circulatory failure
  • Mechanically ventilated & sedated.(Tidal volume 6-8 ml/ kg, PEEP 5 mmHg, Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale RASS (R) Score from zero to -3).
  • Systemic inflammatory response syndrome
  • Septic shock
  • Controlled massive hemorrhage

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age of less than 18 years
  • Cardiomyopathy
  • Pulmonary edema
  • Morbid obesity
  • Pregnancy
  • Increased intracranial tension
  • Valvular heart disease
  • Myocardial ischemia or infarction before the study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
The study group
As a routine work in adult critical care unit at Menoufia University hospital for patients with circulatory failure, A 100 ml bolus of Normal Saline Flush, 0.9% Injectable Solution was given to the patient over 1 minute through a central venous catheter or jugular cannula. For prediction of responders, echocardiographic parameters measured followed by infusion of the remaining 400 ml of Normal Saline Flush, 0.9% Injectable Solution at a constant rate over 10 minutes then echocardiographic parameters measured again to detect the patient response.
As a routine work in adult critical care unit at Menoufia University hospital for patients with circulatory failure, A 100 ml bolus of Normal Saline Flush, 0.9% Injectable Solution was given to the patient over 1 minute through a central venous catheter or jugular cannula. For prediction of responders, echocardiographic parameters measured followed by infusion of the remaining 400 ml of Normal Saline Flush, 0.9% Injectable Solution at a constant rate over 10 minutes then echocardiographic parameters measured again to detect the patient response.
Other Names:
  • normal saline

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Aortic blood flow velocity Time Integral changes from the baseline
Time Frame: Baseline 10 minutes before start of fluid challenge and1 minute after fluid challenge
[cm]
Baseline 10 minutes before start of fluid challenge and1 minute after fluid challenge

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
stroke volume change from the baseline
Time Frame: Baseline 10 minutes before start of fluid challenge and1 minute after fluid challenge
[ml/beat]
Baseline 10 minutes before start of fluid challenge and1 minute after fluid challenge
cardiac output change from the baseline
Time Frame: Baseline 10 minutes before start of fluid challenge and1 minute after fluid challenge
[ liter/minute]
Baseline 10 minutes before start of fluid challenge and1 minute after fluid challenge
heart rate change from the baseline
Time Frame: Baseline 10 minutes before start of fluid challenge and1 minute after fluid challenge
[beats/minute]
Baseline 10 minutes before start of fluid challenge and1 minute after fluid challenge
systolic blood pressure change from the baseline
Time Frame: Baseline 10 minutes before start of fluid challenge and1 minute after fluid challenge
[mmHg]
Baseline 10 minutes before start of fluid challenge and1 minute after fluid challenge
Diastolic blood pressure change from the baseline
Time Frame: Baseline 10 minutes before start of fluid challenge and1 minute after fluid challenge
[mmHg]
Baseline 10 minutes before start of fluid challenge and1 minute after fluid challenge
Central venous pressure change from the baseline
Time Frame: Baseline 10 minutes before start of fluid challenge and1 minute after fluid challenge
[Cm water]
Baseline 10 minutes before start of fluid challenge and1 minute after fluid challenge
Mean arterial blood pressure change from the baseline
Time Frame: Baseline 10 minutes before start of fluid challenge and1 minute after fluid challenge
[mmHg]
Baseline 10 minutes before start of fluid challenge and1 minute after fluid challenge
Left ventricular end systolic diameter change from the baseline
Time Frame: Baseline 10 minutes before start of fluid challenge and1 minute after fluid challenge
[Cm]
Baseline 10 minutes before start of fluid challenge and1 minute after fluid challenge
Left ventricular end diastolic diameter change from the baseline
Time Frame: Baseline 10 minutes before start of fluid challenge and1 minute after fluid challenge
[Cm]
Baseline 10 minutes before start of fluid challenge and1 minute after fluid challenge
Aortic root diameter change from the baseline
Time Frame: Baseline 10 minutes before start of fluid challenge and1 minute after fluid challenge
[Cm]
Baseline 10 minutes before start of fluid challenge and1 minute after fluid challenge

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Abd-Elazeem A Elbakry, M.D, Menofia University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 7, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 5, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

February 26, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 30, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 4, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

August 9, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 25, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 24, 2019

Last Verified

April 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2017/3/1/4

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

the paper protocol only we share if the paper is published in a closed access journal. For open access no problem for sharing the whole data

IPD Sharing Time Frame

starting 6 months after publication

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

through the clinical trial registry site or contact by my e-mail

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Circulatory Failure

Clinical Trials on Normal Saline Flush, 0.9% Injectable Solution

3
Subscribe