High Flow Oxygen VERSUS Non Invasive Ventilation Associated to Automated Flow Oxygen Titration After Patient Extubation (RespiFLOW)

November 9, 2020 updated by: University Hospital, Toulouse

High Flow Oxygen (HFO) VERSUS Non Invasive Ventilation (NIV) Associated to Automated Flow Oxygen Titration (AFOT) After Extubation in Patient With Respiratory Risk: Non-inferiority Prospective Comparative Study

Extubation stay at high risk of reintubation even scheduled and in the best condition of hematosis. Re-intubation's rate in main studies in chronic obstructive diseases reach to 20% and it is associated to a higher mortality, higher pneumonia under mechanic ventilation, and higher duration of hospitalization especially in intensive care units.

Place of NIV in this situation is still on evaluation. A recent meta-analysis demonstrates that use of NIV in post-extubation in COPD seems to decrease re-intubation rate.

HFO, thanks to its properties (oxygen, humidification and heat with high flow) could be useful in this population in ventilatory weaning. Compared to oxygen conventional therapy with high-concentration mask, HFO seems to be as efficient and better tolerated. A recent study shows that HFO is non-inferior to NVI in post-extubation in patient with high risk of re-intubation.

Furthermore, oxygenation in post-extubation should be optimized to avoid hypoxemia and hypercapnia in this patient at risk of hypoventilation. Place of AFOT could improve hematosis by providing adapted flow of oxygen to each patient.

The investigator choose the hypothesis for this study that HFO is as effective and tolerated in post-extubation than NIV with AFOT.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

A recent meta-analysis demonstrates that use of NIV in post-extubation in obstructive chronic bronchopathies seems to decrease re-intubation rate.

High Flow Oxygen, thanks to its properties (oxygen, humidification and heat with high flow) could be useful in this population in ventilatory weaning. Compared to oxygen conventional therapy with high-concentration mask, High Flow Oxygen seems to be as efficient and better tolerated . A recent study shows that High Flow Oxygen is non-inferior to Non Invasive Ventilation in post-extubation in patient with high risk of re-intubation.

Furthermore, oxygenation in post-extubation should be optimized to avoid hypoxemia and hypercapnia in this patient at risk of hypoventilation.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

55

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Toulouse, France, 31049
        • CHU Larrey

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient with respiratory disease suspected or proved (COPD, asthma, bronchiectasis, cystic fibrosis, interstitial pneumonia, obstructive insufficient respiratory, restrictive insufficient respiratory) when an extubation is scheduled.
  • Patient who signed the informed consent
  • Patient affiliated to social insurance

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant woman
  • Terminal extubation
  • NIV at home before intubation (non-exclusion of continue positive airway pressure: CPAP)
  • Tracheotomy
  • Patient under trusteeship, guardianship or safeguard of justice

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: High Flow Oxygen (HFO)
HFO is a mix tap of air and oxygen. It permits to control FiO2 and generated controlled high flow air until 60/min. Air and oxygen are mixed, warmed, humidified and issued to patient by a warming monopod inspiratory circuit to nasal cannulas of a large diameter. Expiration is free.
HFO is a mix tap of air and oxygen. It permits to control FiO2 and generated controlled high flow air until 60/min. Air and oxygen are mixed, warmed, humidified and issued to patient by a warming monopod inspiratory circuit to nasal cannulas of a large diameter. Expiration is free.
Active Comparator: Non Invasive Ventilation (NIV)
NIV was already evaluated in post-extubation. This technic is now used in daily consolidation processing after extubation because it provides a ventilator help with two levels of pressure helping in respiratory work. Adding Automated Flow Oxygen Titration could optimized patient's oxygenation and reduce workload of caregivers
NIV was already evaluated in post-extubation. This technic is now used in daily consolidation processing after extubation because it provides a ventilator help with two levels of pressure helping in respiratory work. Adding Automated Flow Oxygen Titration could optimized patient's oxygenation and reduce workload of caregivers.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Primary outcome: Tolerance of each dispositive
Time Frame: Hours 0
Comfort scale (from 0 to 100 : 0 is totally uncomfortable - 100 : comfortable)
Hours 0
Primary outcome: Tolerance of each dispositive
Time Frame: Hours 6
Comfort scale (from 0 to 100 : 0 is totally uncomfortable - 100 : comfortable)
Hours 6
Primary outcome: Tolerance of each dispositive
Time Frame: Hours 24
Comfort scale (from 0 to 100 : 0 is totally uncomfortable - 100 : comfortable)
Hours 24
Primary outcome: Tolerance of each dispositive
Time Frame: Hours 48
Comfort scale (from 0 to 100 : 0 is totally uncomfortable - 100 : comfortable)
Hours 48

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Dyspnea scale of Borg
Time Frame: Hours 6
Dyspnea score which is a quantitative measure of the perception of effort during a physical exercise. The measure is a rating on a scale from 0 to 10 attached to different words of appreciation: "very light, difficult, painful ..." effort. This global measurement, based on the physical and psychological sensations of the person, takes into account the physical condition, the environmental conditions and the level of general fatigue. The scale between 0 and 10 was designed to approximate the heart rate of a healthy young adult (effort 8 represents 80% of the CF).
Hours 6
Dyspnea scale of Borg
Time Frame: Hours 24
Dyspnea score which is a quantitative measure of the perception of effort during a physical exercise. The measure is a rating on a scale from 0 to 10 attached to different words of appreciation: "very light, difficult, painful ..." effort. This global measurement, based on the physical and psychological sensations of the person, takes into account the physical condition, the environmental conditions and the level of general fatigue. The scale between 0 and 10 was designed to approximate the heart rate of a healthy young adult (effort 8 represents 80% of the CF).
Hours 24
Dyspnea scale of Borg
Time Frame: Hours 48
Dyspnea score which is a quantitative measure of the perception of effort during a physical exercise. The measure is a rating on a scale from 0 to 10 attached to different words of appreciation: "very light, difficult, painful ..." effort. This global measurement, based on the physical and psychological sensations of the person, takes into account the physical condition, the environmental conditions and the level of general fatigue. The scale between 0 and 10 was designed to approximate the heart rate of a healthy young adult (effort 8 represents 80% of the CF).
Hours 48
Treatment's failure defined as use of NVI in HFO group or use of HFO in NVI group
Time Frame: Month 3
defined by reintubation or exchange of treatment or premature discontinuation of treatment
Month 3
Hematosis : PaO2, PaCO2, pH
Time Frame: hours 6
Measurement of PaO2, PaCO2 and pH
hours 6
Hematosis : PaO2, PaCO2, pH
Time Frame: hours 24
Measurement of PaO2, PaCO2 and pH
hours 24
Hematosis : PaO2, PaCO2, pH
Time Frame: hours 48
Measurement of PaO2, PaCO2 and pH
hours 48
Duration of hospitalization in intensive care units, reanimation, hospital after extubation.
Time Frame: Month 3
Measurement of hospitalization in intensive care units in days
Month 3
Mortality in ICU (continuous monitoring unit)
Time Frame: Month 3
Measurement of mortality
Month 3
Mortality in hospital
Time Frame: Month 3
Measurement of mortality
Month 3
Mortality at M1 and M3
Time Frame: Month 1
Measurement of mortality
Month 1
Mortality at M1 and M3
Time Frame: Month 3
Measurement of mortality
Month 3
Use of another technic (HFO or NVI) in time
Time Frame: hours 72
Duration of use of the device (VNI, OHD) at H72
hours 72
Respiratory congestion (number of fibroscopy for airway's desobstruction, number of respiratory kinesitherapy consults, radiological atelectasis)
Time Frame: month 3
Measurement of respiratory congestion by : number of fibroscopy for airway's desobstruction, number of respiratory kinesitherapy consults and radiological atelectasis
month 3
New intubation rate at H48
Time Frame: Hours 48
New intubation rate at H48
Hours 48
New intubation rate at H72
Time Frame: Hours 72
New intubation rate at H72
Hours 72
SpO2 stability
Time Frame: hours 48
Percentage of time spent below 88% and above 92% of SpO2
hours 48
SpO2 stability
Time Frame: hours 72
Percentage of time spent below 88% and above 92% of SpO2
hours 72

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Elise Noel-Savina, MD, University Hospital, Toulouse

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 19, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 26, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

October 15, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 25, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 13, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

August 15, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 10, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 9, 2020

Last Verified

November 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Respiratory Disease

Clinical Trials on High Flow Oxygen (HFO)

3
Subscribe