Lidocaine Compared to Magnesium Sulfate to Prolong Spinal Anesthesia: Non-inferiority Randomized Clinical Trial

February 26, 2020 updated by: Gabriel Magalhaes Nunes Guimaraes, Brasilia University Hospital
This study evaluates the addition of continuous infusion of lidocaine or continuous infusion of magnesium sufate in the duration of spinal anesthesia.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Both lidocaine and magnesium sulfate have been shown to prolong spinal anesthesia.

The number of studies using magnesium sulfate to improve spinal anesthesia is greater than the number of studies using lidocaine, and methodology varies significantly between studies.

Adverse effects of lidocaine are different from magnesium sulfate's. Lidocaine has a wider therapeutic interval with fewer side effects, including: Drowsiness, Feeling Anxious, Feeling Cold, Nervous, Numbness And Tingling, Signs And Symptoms At Injection Site, Twitching.

Magnesium sulfate's side effects include: heart disturbances, breathing difficulties, poor reflexes, confusion, weakness, flushing (warmth, redness, or tingly feeling), sweating, lowered blood pressure, feeling like you might pass out, anxiety, cold feeling, extreme drowsiness, muscle tightness or contraction, or headache.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

44

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Distrito Federal
      • Brasilia, Distrito Federal, Brazil, 70000000
        • Hospital Universitário de Brasília

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 120 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Will receive spinal anesthesia for TURP por Histerectomy

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Protocol violation;
  • Severe adverse events;
  • Change to general anesthesia or addition of epidural anesthesia;
  • Complete or partial spinal block failure;
  • Mental status alteration (agitation, confusion, loss of conciousness).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Magnesium Sulfate
Continuous intravenous infusion of 15mg/kg/h of magnesium sulfate, starting just after spinal anesthesia infusion until the end of surgery
Magnesium Sulfate 15mg/kg/h
Experimental: Lidocaine
Continuous intravenous infusion of 1.5mg/kg/h of lidocaine, starting just after spinal anesthesia infusion until the end of surgery
Lidocaine 1,5mg/kg/h

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Sensitive block duration
Time Frame: 9 hours
Thermal and pinprick level lowering to S2
9 hours

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Motor block duration
Time Frame: 9 hours
Time to Bromage return to baseline
9 hours
Two levels regression
Time Frame: 9 hours
Time from maximal thermal (cold) sensitive block level to lower two levels
9 hours
Pain at postanesthesia care unit
Time Frame: 1-3 hours
Maximum pain (0-10 verbal scale) during PACU
1-3 hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 7, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 27, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 27, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

October 30, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 27, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 26, 2020

Last Verified

February 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Yes

IPD Plan Description

We plan to share de-identified IPD in Mendeley Data after study completion

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Analystic code will be published in RPUBS

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Open Access

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • Analytic Code

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pain

Clinical Trials on Magnesium Sulfate

3
Subscribe