Does Perioperative Intravenous Magnesium Affect Postoperative Quality of Recovery in Craniotomy Surgery Patients?

April 10, 2023 updated by: Kevin Min, Thomas Jefferson University

Does Perioperative Intravenous Magnesium Affect Postoperative Quality of Recovery in Elective Craniotomy Surgery Patients?

Perioperative pain management for craniotomy patients may be challenging because the commonly used agents such as opioids, gabapentin, and dexmedetomidine also cause sedation, which can confound the neurological exam and can lead to respiratory depression and increased intracranial pressure. Preoperative intravenous magnesium boluses and infusions have previously been established as an effective, nonsedating analgesic that can reduce opioid consumption 25-30% up to 48 hours postoperatively.

However, intravenous magnesium has not seen widespread use in craniotomy patients due to concerns for interference with the neurological monitoring that commonly occurs in these cases. Intravenous magnesium given as a bolus preoperatively or as a constant infusion may avoid these problems and has never been investigated.

The goal of this study is to compare intravenous magnesium given preoperatively and intraoperatively to placebo in adult elective craniotomy patients to improve quality of recovery postoperatively, and evaluate safety and tolerability. Secondary endpoints will include evaluating for pain, sedation, agitation, blood pressure, and opioid consumption postoperatively.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

The study is a prospective, randomized, controlled, and double-blinded clinical trial comparing clinical outcomes of craniotomy patients who a magnesium infusion of 15mg/kg/hr to a placebo group of patients who will receive a saline bolus and infusion of equivalent volume starting at surgical closure and continuing for 15 hours. The sample size calculations are based on an effect size 24 point increase in Quality of Recovery-40 Questionnaire scores from a previous randomized control trial featuring the same bolus and infusion regimen as this trial. Investigators, patients, and providers will be blinded. Patients over the age of 18 undergoing elective craniotomy surgery will be enrolled.

The study population will consist of patients undergoing elective craniotomy surgery. The inclusion criteria consists of patient age 18-85, ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) Physical Status Classification 1-3, with Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) of 15 with adequate english comprehension. Exclusion criteria includes pregnant or nursing patients, patients with known allergies to any of the study drugs, patient's refusal, patients with a history of cirrhosis, chronic kidney disease stage 3 or higher, known history of substance abuse, neuromuscular disease or heart block.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

110

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • patient age 18-85
  • ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) Physical Status Classification 1-3
  • Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) of 15
  • Adequate english comprehension

Exclusion Criteria:

  • pregnant or nursing patients
  • patients with known allergies to any of the study drugs
  • patient's refusal
  • patients with a history of cirrhosis
  • chronic kidney disease stage 3 or higher
  • known history of substance abuse
  • history of neuromuscular disease
  • history of heart block

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: Control
The control arm will receive an equivalent volume of normal saline as the treatment group
500 cc normal saline delivered in equivalent rates as the treatment group
Experimental: IV magnesium
We will randomize patients in the treatment group to receive either a 50 mg/kg bolus of intravenous magnesium preoperatively followed by a magnesium infusion of 15mg/kg/hr, to be given after intraoperative neuromonitoring staff have been able to record baseline neurological data.
15 grams magnesium in 500 cc normal saline delivered at a rate of 15 mg/kg/hr
Other Names:
  • Magnesium Sulfate IV

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Quality of Recovery Questionnaire 40
Time Frame: Postoperative days 0-2
Validated measure of postoperative quality of recovery
Postoperative days 0-2

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Hypertension Postoperative
Time Frame: postoperative days 0-2
systolic blood pressure > 160
postoperative days 0-2
Postoperative Hyperglycemia
Time Frame: Postoperative days 0-2
glucose > 180
Postoperative days 0-2
Complications Possibly Related to Intraoperative Neuromonitoring
Time Frame: postoperative days 0-2
We will monitor for rates of complications postoperatively, noting whether or not they could have been detected by intraoperative neuromonitoring
postoperative days 0-2
Shivering
Time Frame: First 2 hours in the postoperative care unit or intensive care unit
Bedside Shivering Scale
First 2 hours in the postoperative care unit or intensive care unit

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Kevin Min, MD, Thomas Jefferson University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

November 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

October 1, 2025

Study Completion (Anticipated)

October 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 31, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 14, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

September 20, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 12, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 10, 2023

Last Verified

April 1, 2023

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Brain Tumor

Clinical Trials on Placebo

3
Subscribe