Erector Spinae Plane Block For Postoperative Analgesia in Patients Undergoing Total Abdominal Hysterectomy (Erector Spinae)

February 21, 2019 updated by: Mohamed hamed, Fayoum University

Erector Spinae Plane Block For Postoperative Analgesia in Patients Undergoing Total Abdominal Hysterectomy: A Randomized Controlled Study

The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of bilateral ESPB on postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing total abdominal hysterectomy under general anesthesia.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

60 patients Scheduled for elective total abdominal hysterectomy, after obtaining a written informed consent for anesthesia from each patient before enrolment in the study after explaining to them the nature of study.

Inclusion criteria included female patients aged 40 - 70 years, Weighted 50 - 90 Kg and with American society of anesthesiologists physical status (ASA) class Ι to ΙΙΙ Scheduled for elective total abdominal hysterectomy under general anesthesia. Exclusion criteria included Local infection at the site of puncture, Patients having history of hematological disorders, including coagulation abnormality, Patients with severe hepatic impairment, Patients with chronic pain and Patient had a known allergy to study drugs.

Patients were randomized into two equal groups. An online randomization program was used to generate random number list. Patient randomization numbers were concealed in opaque envelops which were opened by the study investigator.

Members of the study group involved in obtaining functional data were blinded to randomization for the period of data acquisition and analysis. Patients were randomly allocated into two groups:

Erector spinae plane block Group (ES): ultrasound guided erector spinae plane block at T9 vertebrae level with 20 ml of bupivacaine 0. 5%. Control Group (c): did not receive block.

One day before surgery all patients were interviewed to explain visual analogue scale (VAS), learned how to use patient controlled analgesia (PCA) pump and routine investigations were fulfilled.

In both groups Patients were monitored with ECG, non-invasive blood pressure monitoring and pulse oximetry. IV access was established and IV midazolam 0.01-0.02 mg.kg-1 was given.

In (ES) group After skin sterilization, ESPB was performed in sitting position at the level of T9 linear ultrasound (US) transducer (Phillips-Saronno Italy) was placed vertically 3cm lateral to midline to visualize the muscles of the back: the trapezius muscle above, the rhomboid major muscle in the middle and the erector-spinae muscle on the bottom, transverse process and simmering pleura in between the two transverse processes. After local infiltration of needle insertion site with 2-3ml of 2% lidocaine, a 22-gauge Short bevel needle (Spinocan, B.Braun Melsungen AG, Germany) was inserted in cranial-caudal direction towards transverse process (TP) in-plane to the US transducer until needle touched the TP crossing all the muscles. Correct needle placement was confirmed by Visualizing the needle in plane along its entire length, when it contacted the transverse process, 1 ml of anesthetic solution was injected. Hydrodissection of the interfascial plane between the erector spinae muscle and the transverse process was confirmed by visualizing the local anesthetic spreading in a linear pattern between the muscle and the bony acoustic shadows of the transverse process, ensuring correct localization. Then, up to 20 ml of bupivacaine 0.5% was injected. The procedure was repeated following the same steps on the other side of back. Control Group (c): the same pervious technique as in ES group but patient did not receive block.

Block success was tested by reduced cold sensation at planned surgical incision 5 minutes after block completion.

General anesthesia was induced with fentanyl 2 mcg.kg-1, propofol 2 mg.kg-1 followed by atracium 0.5 mg.kg-1 and after intubation Anesthesia was maintained with isoflurane (1 MAC) and atracium 0.1mg.kg-1 as a maintenance dose every 30 minutes till the end of the procedure; After emerging from anesthesia, the patients were transferred to the post aesthesia care unit (PACU) for a 2 hours observation period. The patients were discharged from the PACU after fulfilling the discharge criteria based on Aldrete score. Postoperative analgesia was provided in both groups immediately after surgery by PCA fentanyl pump then regular oral acetaminophen 1 g four times a day.

The criteria to stop fentanyl titration protocol were satisfactory pain control, Patient became sedated (Ramsay sedation scale >2), Respiratory rate < 12 / min, Oxygen saturation < 95% or development of serious adverse effects (allergy, severe vomiting, hypotension).

Visual analogue pain score (VAS) for pain (ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 no pain and 10 maximum pain) was measured postoperatively at 30 min and 2, 4, 6, 12, and 24 hour postoperative.

Any side effects were recorded as nausea or vomiting, pneumothorax, or any other complications. Also Duration of hospital stays, from the first day postoperative until discharge.

The primary outcome of this study was Total fentanyl consumption in the first 24 hours And The secondary outcome was VAS for pain (ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 no pain and 10 maximum pain) was evaluated postoperatively at 30 min and 2, 4, 6, 12, and 24 hour postoperative, Duration of hospital stays and any complications.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Fayoum, Egypt, 65345
        • Mohamed

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

40 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • female patients
  • Aged 40 - 70 years,
  • Weighted 50 - 90 Kg
  • American society of Anesthesiologists physical status (ASA) class Ι to ΙΙΙ
  • Scheduled for elective total abdominal hysterectomy under general anesthesia

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Local infection at the site of puncture
  • Patients having a history of hematological disorders, including coagulation abnormality
  • Patients with severe hepatic impairment
  • Patients with chronic pain
  • A patient had a known allergy to study drugs.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: ES
Erector Spinae Plane Block
In (ES) group After skin sterilization, ESPB was performed in sitting position at the level of T9 linear ultrasound (US) transducer (Phillips-Saronno Italy) was placed vertically 3cm lateral to midline to visualize the muscles of the back, transverse process and simmering pleura in between the two transverse processes. After local infiltration of needle insertion site with 2-3ml of 2% lidocaine, a 22-gauge Short bevel needle (Spinocan, B.Braun Melsungen AG, Germany) was inserted in cranial-caudal direction towards transverse process (TP) in-plane to the US transducer until needle touched the TP crossing all the muscles. Then, up to 20 ml of bupivacaine 0.5% was injected. The procedure was repeated following the same steps on the other side of back.
Placebo Comparator: control
the control group will not receive block
in control group, Erector Spinae Plane Block will not be done

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Fentanyl consumption
Time Frame: first 24 hours postoperative
in microgram
first 24 hours postoperative

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Visual analog score
Time Frame: 30 minutes postoperative
ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 no pain and 10 maximum pain
30 minutes postoperative
Visual analog score
Time Frame: 2 hours postoperative
ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 no pain and 10 maximum pain
2 hours postoperative
Visual analog score
Time Frame: 4 hours postoperative
ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 no pain and 10 maximum pain
4 hours postoperative
Visual analog score
Time Frame: 6 hours postoperative
ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 no pain and 10 maximum pain
6 hours postoperative
Visual analog score
Time Frame: 12 hours postoperative
ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 no pain and 10 maximum pain
12 hours postoperative
Visual analog score
Time Frame: 24 hours postoperative
ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 no pain and 10 maximum pain
24 hours postoperative

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Age
Time Frame: 4 hours before operation once recruited
in years
4 hours before operation once recruited
Weight
Time Frame: 4 hours before operation once recruited
in Kilogram
4 hours before operation once recruited
Duration of surgery
Time Frame: 4 minutes after end of operation
in minutes
4 minutes after end of operation

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: mohamed a hamed, MD, Fayoum university

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 15, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 15, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

October 15, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 11, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 11, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

November 14, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 22, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 21, 2019

Last Verified

February 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Postoperative Pain

Clinical Trials on Erector Spinae Plane Block

3
Subscribe