Early Closure Versus Conventional Closure in Postoperative Patients With Low Anteriresection for Rectal Cancer

September 1, 2020 updated by: Instituto Nacional de Cancerologia, Columbia

Early Closure of the Derivative Ileostomy Versus Conventional Closure in Postoperative Patients With Low Anterior Resection for Rectal Cancer

Colorectal cancer worldwide is the third most common in men and the second in female, although mortality is not as high as its incidence, there is less survival in developing countries. According to data from the World Health Organization, in 2012, there were an estimated 1.4 million cases and 693,900 deaths from this disease. Patients with rectal cancer are frequently taken to resection surgery as a curative management of their malignant pathology, according to the type of resection or reconstruction. In a high number of cases, they are management with colorectal anastomosis with a derivative ileostomy in the same procedure. The closure of this ileostomy is usually done after two to three months of the procedure, however in our environment it could take up to six or twelve months, during which time the patient is exposed to social difficulties, management problems and complications, derived from it. The early closure (7-12 days of its creation) of an ileostomy, despite the little evidence, seems to be a safe, feasible procedure that would save the patient having to live temporarily with an ileostomy.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

General purpose:

To compare the frequency of perioperative complications and quality of life between early closure of the derivative ileostomy versus conventional closure in postoperative patients with low anterior resection for rectal cancer.

Materials and methods:

Controlled clinical trial, randomized, to be carried out at the National Cancer Institute of Colombia E.S.E. Eligible candidates for the study will be patients older than 18 years who have undergone a previous resection of the rectum plus a derivative ileostomy for colorectal cancer. All patients eligible for inclusion will undergo computed axial tomography with rectal contrast medium on postoperative day 5. Those who meet the inclusion criteria and do not present any of the exclusion criteria will enter the study, prior willingness to participate by part of the patient and obtaining verbal and written informed consent. Through computer-generated randomization, patients will undergo early closure (between 7 and 12 days after the ileostomy) versus conventional closure (after 90 days or more time from the creation of the ileostomy). A sample size of 81 patients was calculated for each arm. The follow-up will be done in both groups at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months after the creation of the ileostomy, including complications using the Clavien-Dindo classification and quality of life using the FACIT-C format. The statistical analysis will be done by protocol and intention to treat. The perioperative complications associated with the closure of the ileostomy, the complications associated with the presence of ileostomy, hospital stay, and quality of life will be analyzed.

Expected impact:

The investigators hope to find that the early closure of ileostomy in patients during the immediate postoperative period of previous resection due to rectal cancer is safe in terms of morbidity and mortality, feasible and with benefits in quality of life during the immediate postoperative period compared with patients to whom they are closed late (after 3 months).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

52

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Medellín, Colombia
        • Hospital Pablo Tobón Uribe
      • Medellín, Colombia
        • Clinica Vida
    • Cundinamarca
      • Bogota, Cundinamarca, Colombia, 0000
        • Instituto Nacional de Cancerologia

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion criteria:

Patients older than 18 years Diagnosis of Rectal cancer treated at the National Institute of Cancerology and any of the institutions attached to the study

Exclusion criteria:

Complications derived from the anterior resection of the rectum:

  • Unresolved intestinal obstruction
  • Sepsis
  • Organ or space type operative site infection
  • Hemodynamic inestability
  • Need for reinterventions due to complications
  • Coagulopathy
  • Active bleeding

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Early closure of ileostomy
Early clousure of ileostomy before 30 days
Assigned interventions Conventional closure of ileostomy: Surgical closure of the protective ileostomy 90 or more days after the proctectomy surgery
Active Comparator: Conventional closure of ileostomy
Conventional closure of ileostomy after 30 days
Assigned interventions Conventional closure of ileostomy: Surgical closure of the protective ileostomy 90 or more days after the proctectomy surgery

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
perioperative complications
Time Frame: 6 yr

To compare the frequency of perioperative complications and quality of life between early ( closure of the derivative ileostomy versus conventional closure in postoperative patients with low anterior resection for rectal cancer.

Using the Clavien-Dindo classification (It consists of 7 grades (I, II, IIIa, IIIb, IVa, IVb and V). The introduction of the subclasses a and b allows a contraction of the classification into 5 grades (I, II, III, IV and V) depending on the size of the population observed or the of the focus of a study.

Complications that have the potential for long-lasting disability after patient's discharge (e.g.: paralysis of a voice cord after thyroid surgery) are highlighted in the present classification by a suffix ("d" for disability). This suffix indicates that a follow-up is required to comprehensively evaluate the outcome and related long-term quality of life)

6 yr

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The follow-up for describe complications
Time Frame: 6 yr

Using the Clavien-Dindo classification (It consists of 7 grades (I, II, IIIa, IIIb, IVa, IVb and V). The introduction of the subclasses a and b allows a contraction of the classification into 5 grades (I, II, III, IV and V) depending on the size of the population observed or the of the focus of a study.

Complications that have the potential for long-lasting disability after patient's discharge (e.g.: paralysis of a voice cord after thyroid surgery) are highlighted in the present classification by a suffix ("d" for disability). This suffix indicates that a follow-up is required to comprehensively evaluate the outcome and related long-term quality of life)

6 yr
Measure quality of life
Time Frame: 6 yr
Using the FACIT-C format (Version 4)
6 yr

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Alexander Carreño, Md, Instituto Nacional de Cancerologia, Columbia

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 5, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 11, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 31, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 16, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

November 19, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 2, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 1, 2020

Last Verified

September 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Colorectal Surgery

Clinical Trials on early ileostomy closure

3
Subscribe