The Effects of Abdominal Massage on Functional (Primary) Chronic Constipation

October 11, 2021 updated by: SERAP ÖZGÜL, Hacettepe University
The aim of the present study is to investigate the efficacy of abdominal massage in patients with functional (primary) chronic constipation. The present study is designed as a randomized placebo controlled. Since the placebo group is included in the research design, if there is a greater improvement of symptoms of constipation and quality of life in the massage group when compared to the control group, it will be determined that this effect is not related to a placebo effect. If the efficacy of Abdominal Massage is revealed with a placebo controlled design, the therapist effect will be eliminated and further evidence on a well-known massage technique in functional (primary) chronic constipation, a common gastrointestinal problem, will be provided. The results of the present placebo controlled randomized trial will indicate that the need for pharmacological agents and the side effects associated with these agents will be reduced. According to the literature, there are studies that investigate the effects of abdominal massage on symptoms of constipation and quality of life. However, it has generally been used for secondary constipation or two applications have been compared. In addition, there is no randomized placebo-controlled study investigating the effect of abdominal massage on severity of chronic constipation and quality of life.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Constipation is a subjective symptom that defines as inadequate defecation including several symptoms as follows: the sensation of incomplete bowel evacuation, hard stool, straining, and difficulty in defecation. The general prevalence of constipation in adults is 16%. The pre-defined risk factors are women gender, advanced age, non-white ethnicity, low socio-economic level, decreased physical activity underlying diseases, and medications. Chronic constipation affects quality of life and causes problems such as anxiety, depression, somatization, sleep disorders, sexual dysfunctions, school/work absenteeism. In the following periods, it causes serious comorbidities including dyspnea, gastro-esophageal reflux, hypertension, thyroid diseases, vaginitis, dyspareunia, diabetes, and fibromyalgia.

In the treatment of chronic constipation, conservative approaches (lifestyle change and physiotherapy applications) are used at the first phase. If conservative approaches are not helpful for patients pharmacological and surgical treatment can be performed based on the characteristics of patients, respectively. Pharmacological treatments aim to increase the frequency of spontaneous bowel movements, to reduce abdominal pain and swelling, and to improve stool consistency. However, side effects such as abdominal bloating, abdominal cramping, abdominal pain, stomach gas, nausea, diarrhea, headache and dyspnea are reported by patients in the following period. Furthermore, medications for constipation management are not cost-effective. Therefore, the level of evidence on conservative approaches with low cost, non-invasive and no-side effects in constipation treatment should be increased.

Physiotherapy approaches to alleviate chronic constipation symptoms include such as defecation training, abdominal massage, connective tissue massage, electrical stimulation, Kinesio-taping, anorectal biofeedback, and exercise training. Abdominal massage application in constipation is used in constipation management since the early 1870s and it is popular in recent years. The benefits of abdominal massage are known as follows: reduction in the abdominal muscle tension, improvement of local circulation, and stimulation of peristaltic movements. The technique of abdominal massage consists of 5 stages as follows: abdominal muscle stroking, colon stroking, colon kneading, colon stroking, and abdominal muscle stroking.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

74

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Ankara, Turkey, 06100
        • Ceren Gursen

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years to 63 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age between 18 and 65 years.
  • Diagnosed with chronic constipation according to Rome IV criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • A recent history of abdominal surgery
  • Intestinal obstruction, ileus, colon cancer
  • Enteric neuropathic patients: Diabetic intestinal neuropathy, Hirschsprung's disease, Megacolon, Megarectum
  • Umbilical hernia
  • Metabolic diseases: Cancer, Chronic renal failure, Severe cardiovascular disease, Hepatic failure, Hepatosplenomegaly, Abdominal aortic aneurysm
  • Neurological diseases: Parkinson, Spinal cord injury, Multiple sclerosis, Cerebro-vascular event,
  • Paraplegia Mental problem to prevent co-operative treatment
  • Pregnancy and lactation

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Abdominal Massage
Lifestyle advices such as increasing fluid and fibre intake, improving physical activity level, and taking the ideal posture for defecation (squatting position) with a two-pages document.
Abdominal massage will be performed three days a week for four weeks. Each session will last around 15-20 minutes.
Placebo Comparator: Placebo Ultrasound
Lifestyle advices such as increasing fluid and fibre intake, improving physical activity level, and taking the ideal posture for defecation (squatting position) with a two-pages document.
Placebo ultrasound (US) will be applied to the abdominal region for four weeks, 2 days of the week and 15 minutes per day.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Severity of constipation
Time Frame: Change in severity of constipation from baseline at 4 weeks
Constipation Severity Instrument (CSI) will be used to evaluate the severity of the constipation. CSI was designed to evaluate defecation frequency and consistency as well as the level of straining experienced by individuals during bowel movement. There are three subscales of CSI, obstructive defecation (OT), colonic inertia (CI), and pain. Higher scores of CSI indicate more severe constipation.
Change in severity of constipation from baseline at 4 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patient Assessment of Constipation Quality of life
Time Frame: Change in quality of life from baseline at 4 weeks
Patient Assessment of Constipation Quality of Life Questionnaire (PAC-QOL) will be used to evaluate quality of life. This questionnaire includes a total of 28 items in 4 subscales: worries and concerns (11 items), physical discomfort (4 items), psychosocial discomfort (8 items), and satisfaction (5 items). Higher scores of PAC-QOL indicate more negative effects of constipation on the quality of life.
Change in quality of life from baseline at 4 weeks
Stool consistency
Time Frame: Change from baseline stool consistency at 4 weeks
The stool consistency will be evaluated using the Bristol Stool Scale (BSS), quick and useful indicator of the colonic transit time , a seven-point scale (from 1 to 7), type 1=separate hard lumps, like nuts; 2=sausage shaped but lumpy; 3=like a sausage or snake, but with cracks on its surface; 4=like a sausage or snake, smooth and soft; 5=soft blobs with clear cut edges; 6=pieces with ragged edges, a mushy stool; 7=water, no solid pieces. While type 1 and 2 indicate hard stool, type 3,4 and 5 show looser (ideal) stool.
Change from baseline stool consistency at 4 weeks
Symptoms of constipation
Time Frame: Change from baseline symptoms of constipation at 4 weeks
In order to gather information regarding the participants' symptoms of constipation, they will be asked to complete a 7-day bowel diary during the treatment period. This diary includes items regarding the frequency of bowel movement, stool consistency, defecation time, feeling of incomplete evacuation, and changes in food and liquid consumption.
Change from baseline symptoms of constipation at 4 weeks
Abdominal pain, abdominal bloating severity and the effect of life
Time Frame: Change from baseline symptoms of constipation at 4 weeks
Visual Analogue Scale (VAS): This scale is a 10 cm horizontal line. 0 = no pain / bloating / meaning no effect, 10 = unbearable pain / bloating / experiencing
Change from baseline symptoms of constipation at 4 weeks
Physical activity levels
Time Frame: Change from baseline symptoms of constipation at 4 weeks
The physical activity levels of the individuals in the last seven days are evaluated under 4 headings (severe activities, moderate activity, walking and sitting). While calculating the total score, the MET-min scores of the patients are obtained by multiplying the duration of activity and frequency of activities (number of days) by the BAT values given to activities (severe activity = 8 MET, moderate activity = 4 MET, walking = 3.3 MET)
Change from baseline symptoms of constipation at 4 weeks
Patient global change scale
Time Frame: Change from baseline patient global change at 4 weeks
It is a 7-item scale that evaluates the perception of the change in the effect of constipation and related complaints on the life of the patient compared to the study. The options on this scale are ''much much better'', ''much better'', 'a little better'', ''no change", ''a little worse'', ''much worse'', ''much much worse''
Change from baseline patient global change at 4 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 10, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 16, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

May 16, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 3, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 3, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

December 5, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 12, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 11, 2021

Last Verified

October 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Constipation

Clinical Trials on Standard bowel management

3
Subscribe