Glucose Control Using 1,5-AG Testing (GLUCAR)

Glucose Control Using 1,5-AG: Randomized Controlled Trial

Glycemic excursions (temporary increases in blood glucose) are associated with health complications. Standard tests for diabetes (e.g. random blood sugar and HbA1c) do not test for these excursions despite their association with several health complications. GlycoMark's 1,5-anhydroglucitol (1,5-AG) is a validated indicator of glucose excursions in addition to short-term (1-2 weeks) hyperglycemia.

This study is a pre-post, two-round randomized controlled study of a nationally representative sample of primary care physicians. Investigators will assess whether physician participants are able to identify and address glycemic variability and hyperglycemia in their patients and, when given access to GlycoMark assay results, improve their patient management decisions by taking steps to optimize glycemic control, and reduce unnecessary resource utilization.

Study Overview

• Status: Completed
• Conditions: Diabetes
• Intervention / Treatment: Other: Clinical Performance and Value Vignettes; Diagnostic test: GlycoMark 1-5-AG

Detailed Description

Nearly half of the adult population, 114 million Americans, are diagnosed with diabetes or pre-diabetes, making it one of the most important public and personal health problems. Diabetes is the 7th leading cause of death in America and a contributing factor in many more deaths and lost days of productivity. Its complications include vascular disease, cardiovascular disease, stroke and dementia. The cost of diabetes care and its complications lead to $176 billion in direct medical costs and $69 billion in reduced productivity. With an over 2-fold increase in diabetes prevalence in the past two decades and an estimated 1.5 million new cases expected annually, it is clinically and economically critical for this condition to be managed appropriately.

Diabetes treatment programs focus on controlling hyperglycemia (random glucose > 200 mg/dL) without causing hypoglycemia (glucose < 70 mg/dL). Glucose control is determined in a number of ways in current clinical practice. Immediate and fasting blood sugars are determined in routine chemistry tests. The standard measure of long-term diabetes control, HbA1c testing, provides a reliable reading of average blood glucose levels over a 2-3-month period. In patients with high HbA1c levels, HbA1c measurement guides management decisions and helps the clinician bring the long-term glucose levels under control in poorly controlled diabetic patients. Random blood sugars and HbA1c is limited in that they do not reflect glycemic control in intervals greater than the past few hours and 2-3 months. In particular, they do not provide an indication of frequent, temporary increases in blood glucose, termed glycemic excursions, which have been independently associated with several health complications. Since it takes months for HbA1c levels to stabilize, HbA1c levels are also not helpful for patients starting medication or changing drug therapy.

1,5-anhydroglucitol (1,5-AG) is a molecule found in the blood and is a validated indicator of glucose excursions and short-term (1-2 weeks) hyperglycemia. In healthy patients without diabetes, or those with well-controlled diabetes, 1,5-AG is maintained at a steady state in the blood. However, during glycemic excursions, the molecule is actively purged from the body through the urine. Cleared by the FDA in 2003, the GlycoMark assay measures 1,5-AG levels in the blood. Low levels of 1,5-AG indicate the presence of potentially harmful glycemic excursion over the last 1 to 2 weeks, which may have been missed during random blood glucose testing and not sensitively detected by HbA1c.

GlycoMark testing provides clinical details on peak glucose levels, daily spikes, and response to drugs, including short term effects, of hypoglycemic agents that are otherwise not available, giving physicians a more complete understanding of their patient's glycemic control. This information may be clinically useful to help physicians make better management decisions, improve diabetes outcomes, avoid complications and reduce unnecessary spending.

This study is a pre-post, two-round randomized controlled study of a nationally representative sample of primary care physicians randomly assigned to a control or intervention arm. Enrolled participants will be asked to care for a sample of CPV® simulated patients. The simulated patients are adults aged 18-75 who present with diabetes, different levels of glycemic control and various co-morbidities. Participants randomized into an intervention-arm will receive educational materials and 1,5-AG test results when caring for their patients in round 2. Investigators will assess the participants' ability to identify and address glycemic variability and hyperglycemia and evaluate whether physicians who have access to GlycoMark take steps to optimize glycemic control and reduce unnecessary resource utilization.

• Study Type: Interventional
• Enrollment (Actual): 156
• Phase: Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

Study Locations

• United States
  • California
    • San Francisco, California, United States, 94109
      • QURE Healthcare

Participation Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: Child; Adult; Older Adult
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No
• Genders Eligible for Study: All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

• A minimum of 2 years post residency but no more than 30 years in practice
• Board-certified in internal medicine or family practice, primary care physicians
• In a private solo or multi-group practice
• Minimum threshold of patients (40+) currently seen weekly
• A minimum of 15% of their panel under their care for diabetes
• Have not used GlycoMark assay in the past
• Informed, signed and voluntarily consented to be in the study

Exclusion Criteria:

• Not board certified in their respective area of care
• Academic-based practice
• Have practiced as a board-certified physician for less than 2 or greater than 30 years
• Have used the GlycoMark assay
• Follow <40 patients weekly
• < 15% of their patient panel under their care for diabetes
• Non-English speaking
• Unable to access the internet

Study Plan

How is the study designed?

Design Details

• Primary Purpose: Other
• Allocation: Randomized
• Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
• Masking: None (Open Label)

Number of Arms

2

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm	Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Control; Control participants will care for the same set of CPV patients as the intervention arm, but will not have knowledge of or access to GlycoMark 1,5-AG test results. Investigators will compare control participants' clinical recommendations to those in the intervention arm.	Other: Clinical Performance and Value Vignettes; Simulated diabetic patients cared for online; Other Names: CPVs
Experimental: Intervention; Intervention participants will care for the same set of CPV patients as the control arm, but will be educated on and given access to GlycoMark 1,5-AG test results. Investigators will compare intervention participants' clinical recommendations to those in the control arm.	Other: Clinical Performance and Value Vignettes; Simulated diabetic patients cared for online; Other Names: CPVs; Diagnostic test: GlycoMark 1-5-AG; Online educational materials on GlycoMark 1,5-AG and sample test results for simulated patients

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Diagnosis-Treatment	Difference-in-differences regression analysis between the control and the intervention group's identification and treatment of hyperglycemia, as measured by the participants diagnostic and treatment CPV case domain scores. In each domain of a CPV (history, physical exam, workup, diagnosis and treatment), participants' care recommendations are evaluated against evidence-based care scoring criteria which can sum to a high potential score of up to 100% in each domain.	3 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Quality of Care	Difference-in-differences regression analysis between the control and the intervention group's overall quality of care scores. In each CPV case, participants' care recommendations are evaluated against evidence-based care scoring criteria which can sum to a high potential score of up to 100% in each case.	3 months
Workup Costs	Difference-in-differences regression analysis between between the control and the intervention group in the average cost of diagnostic tests ordered.	3 months

Collaborators and Investigators

• Sponsor: Qure Healthcare, LLC
• Collaborators: GlycoMark, Inc
• Investigators: Study Director: Mary Tran, MS, QURE Healthcare; Principal Investigator: John W Peabody, MD, QURE Healthcare

Study record dates

Study Major Dates

• Study Start (Actual): November 5, 2018
• Primary Completion (Actual): February 24, 2019
• Study Completion (Actual): February 24, 2019

Study Registration Dates

• First Submitted: November 30, 2018
• First Submitted That Met QC Criteria: December 3, 2018
• First Posted (Actual): December 5, 2018

Study Record Updates

• Last Update Posted (Actual): October 28, 2020
• Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria: October 6, 2020
• Last Verified: October 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

• Other Study ID Numbers: Pro00024791

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

• Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?: No

Drug and device information, study documents

• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product: No
• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product: Yes
• product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.: No