The Prevalence and Anatomical Variations of Bifid Mandibular Canal in the Egyptian Population Using Cone Beam CT (CBCT)

January 25, 2021 updated by: Enas El Saket, Cairo University

The Prevalence and Anatomical Variations of Bifid Mandibular Canal in a Sample of Egyptian Population Using CBCT.A Hospital-based Cross-Sectional Study

The prevalence of bifid mandibular canal will be detected in a sample of Egyptian Population.Anatomical variations of the bifid canal will also be detected.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

Settings:

The data collection will be obtained from the data base available at the department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University. CBCT images will be obtained from Egyptian patients who were referred to the CBCT unit in oral and maxillofacial radiology department for different purposes.

Variables:

•Prevalence of bifid canals - Classification and prevalence of observed types - Distance from the involved teeth

Data Sources / Measurements:

  • Retrospective Data Analysis will be performed after the CBCT images are pooled from the computer database.
  • Exposure parameters of the scans will vary depending on patients' sizes (according to the manufacturer's recommendations).
  • Both images with 0.2 and 0.4 voxel sizes will be reviewed.
  • For proper visualization of the mandibular canal, the reference lines will be rotated, so that it lies perpendicular to the mandibular foramen on the axial cuts. Then, scrolling through the corrected sagittal cuts will be performed to review the clearest cut of the full course of the mandibular canal. Moreover, corrected coronal cuts will be reviewed, to determine the exits of the accessory branches (buccal or lingual) if present.
  • CBCT images will be interpreted by two oral and maxillofacial radiologists (with different experiences) independently; blinded from demographic data of the patients and from the results of each other.
  • The classification of Naitoh et al 2009 will be followed for the categorization of the accessory branches:

    1. Forward canal: emerging from the superior wall of the main canal.
    2. Bucco-lingual canal: emerging from the buccal or the lingual wall of the main canal.
    3. Dental canal: the end of the bifid canal is at the root apex of the molars.
    4. Retromolar canal: emerging from the main canal, opening at the retromolar foramen in the retromolar area.
  • Each radiologist will evaluate the images for presence of bifid canal twice with a time lag of two weeks between the two reading sessions. If present, its configuration (classification) will be registered. Any disagreement will be solved by consensus between the two observers.
  • If adherence or closeness of the canals to the teeth is detected, then the distance between the canal and the involved tooth will be measured using built in measuring tool in the software.
  • The measurements will be carried out by one observer (EE) and will be repeated 2 weeks later for intra-observer reliability assessment.

Bias

No source of bias.

Study Size:

The aim of the study is to assess the prevalence of bifid mandibular canal in Egyptian population. Based on the previous paper by Afsa and Rahmati 2017, the prevalence of bifid mandibular canal was 31% Using a precision of 5, a design effect set at 1 with 95% CI (confidence interval), a total sample size of 329 hemimandibles will be sufficient. The sample size was calculated by Epi info 7 software.

Quantitative Variables:

Quantitative data: The distance between the canal and involved teeth and will be reported as mean and standard deviation.

Statistical methods:

Data will be analyzed using SPSS® v. 15 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL) software program. Pearson Chi square and t-tests was performed for statistical analysis among gender, localization and measurements. Categorical data will be described as numbers and percentages. A p value of <0.05 will be considered statistically significant.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

329

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Cairo, Egypt
        • Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 70 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Egyptian population

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age range from 18 to 70
  • Scans showing the premolar, molar, retromolar areas.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with mandibular lesions.
  • Scans with severe metallic artifacts.
  • Patients with previous fractures or surgeries.
  • Severe bone resorption.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Bifid mandibular canal detection, measuring device is CBCT software Romexis, measuring unit is percentage ( Dichotomous data - Yes or No )
Time Frame: up to 2019
Detection of bifid mandibular canal in Egyptian population
up to 2019

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Prevalence of types,measuring device is CBCT software Romexis, measuring unit is Categorical nominal data(%)
Time Frame: up to 2019
They are either Forward canal, Bucco-lingual canal , Retromolar canal, Dental canal
up to 2019

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Distance to adjacent teeth, measuring device is Built-in measuring tool (ruler), measuring unit is mm
Time Frame: up to 2019
distance to adjacent teeth will be measured
up to 2019
Region of exit of retromolar canal,measuring device is CBCT software Romexis, measuring unit is Categorical nominal data (%)
Time Frame: up to 2019
They are either buccal or lingual or non-visible
up to 2019
Prevalence according to gender,measuring unit is categorical nominal data (%)
Time Frame: up to 2019
They are either male or female
up to 2019

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

September 10, 2019

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

August 1, 2020

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

October 15, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 7, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 11, 2019

First Posted (ACTUAL)

January 15, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

January 27, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 25, 2021

Last Verified

January 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • ORAD 7-1-1

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on The Prevalence of Bifid Mandibular Canal

3
Subscribe